Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

K.R. Sundram v. The Land Acquisition Officer & SPC. Tahis

14 Oct 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act by correcting a clerical error in sale data and considering the true market value and location factors.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act compensation market value sale instance

Goa Foundation v. Union of India

14 Oct 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the application of a mining lease holder seeking to restrain auction of mined mineral ore, holding that all such ore vested in the State Government post lease expiry and must be sold by e-auction with lease holders entitled only to approximate extraction costs.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant mining lease expiry mineral ore ownership e-auction Mineral Concession Rules 1960

State of Karnataka v. Suvarnamma & Anr.

14 Oct 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's acquittal in a dowry death case, holding that despite minor discrepancies and investigation lapses, the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the accused's false plea was an incriminating circumstance.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry harassment dying declaration Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC

Dr. Thakar Singh v. Sh. Mula Singh

14 Oct 2014 · Dipak Misra; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that tenancies created by mortgagees during the mortgage do not bind the mortgagor after redemption, and any clause permitting such tenancy post-redemption is an invalid clog on the equity of redemption.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mortgage equity of redemption tenancy mortgagee

A K Devaiah v. State of Karnataka

14 Oct 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld conviction for dowry death and cruelty under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act, affirming mandatory presumption of guilt upon proof of harassment related to dowry demands.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Rajni Rani & Anr. v. Khairati Lal & Ors.

14 Oct 2014 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda

An order dismissing a counter-claim on merits is a decree and must be challenged by appeal, not by revision under Article 227 of the Constitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant counter-claim Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Section 115 CPC Article 227 Constitution

Raunaq Education Foundation v. State of Haryana & Ors.

14 Oct 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful resumption of forest land allotted to an educational trust for non-compliance with allotment conditions and misuse, emphasizing mandatory prior approval under the Forest Conservation Act and constitutional mandates of fairness and public interest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land resumption public land allotment Forest Conservation Act 1980 prior approval

R.N. Agarwal v. R.C. Bansal

14 Oct 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that a Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act has jurisdiction to summon additional accused at the committal stage under Section 193 CrPC based on investigation material, overruling earlier contrary precedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Landmark Section 193 CrPC Section 209 CrPC Section 319 CrPC Special Judge

Raunaq Education Foundation v. State of Haryana & Ors.

14 Oct 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful resumption of public forest land allotted to a private educational trust due to non-compliance with allotment conditions and invalid diversion without central approval.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land allotment resumption of land public land forest land diversion

Vinod Kumar v. Gangadhar

13 Oct 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court set aside a cryptic High Court dismissal of a first appeal for specific performance, holding that the appellate court must independently reappreciate evidence and decide all issues with reasons, and remanded the case for fresh disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant first appeal Section 96 CPC Order 41 Rule 31 CPC specific performance

State of Rajasthan v. Mohammad Muslim Tagala

13 Oct 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that the power to commute sentences under Section 433 CrPC is an exclusive executive discretion and courts cannot direct commutation, setting aside the High Court's order directing such commutation in a grave offence case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 433 CrPC commutation of sentence executive discretion Public Prosecutor concession

Guttikonda Venkataramaiah v. Godavarthy Venkateswarlu & Anr.

13 Oct 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the auction purchaser's appeal, setting aside the High Court's order for resale, holding that confirmed auction sales cannot be set aside due to belated and negligent objections by the judgment debtor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction sale execution proceedings Order XXI CPC Rule 90 Order XXI CPC

Satye Singh & Another v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi · 2022 INSC 185

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove the murder beyond reasonable doubt on incomplete circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder burden of proof Section 302 IPC

Satye Singh & Another v. State of Uttarakhand

11 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove the murder beyond reasonable doubt on incomplete circumstantial evidence and clarified that suspicion and Section 106 Evidence Act do not shift the burden of proof in criminal cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC

Basappa Bahvikatti v. T Ramesh S/O Tangavelu & Anr.

10 Oct 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by applying the correct principles for assessing loss of future earning capacity based on functional disability and awarded interest at 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation permanent disability loss of future earning capacity functional disability

Rasheeda Khatoon v. Ashiq Ali

10 Oct 2014 · Dipak Misra; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that under Muhammadan Law, a valid gift requires declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession, and since the plaintiff failed to prove possession, the gift was invalid and the suit for possession was dismissed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Muhammadan Law oral gift gift deed possession

A. Tajudeen v. Union of India

10 Oct 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that retracted statements made under alleged coercion without independent corroboration cannot sustain penal action under Section 9(1)(b) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973, and set aside the confiscation and penalty imposed on the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 9(1)(b) voluntary statement retracted confession

CC (COAL CARRIERS) (JV) v. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD.

10 Oct 2014 · J. CHELAMESWAR; A.K. SIKRI

The Supreme Court held that disputes arising from commercial contracts must first be resolved through contractual dispute resolution mechanisms before invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition Article 226 commercial contract dispute dispute resolution mechanism

M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders v. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meerut

10 Oct 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that an NSC issued in the name of a sole proprietorship can be regularized by substituting the individual proprietor's name, directing payment of maturity amount with interest and compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant National Savings Certificate sole proprietorship Post Office Savings Bank General Rules 1981 Rule 17

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramanand Pandey

10 Oct 2014 · J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that cancellation of a promotion order is valid when the promoted employee refuses to join the post and returns the promotion order, even if no disciplinary proceedings were pending at the time of promotion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant promotion cancellation of promotion departmental inquiry refusal to join