Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

MD. JAMILUDDIN NASIR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

10 Oct 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court allowed procedural corrections in criminal miscellaneous petitions related to appeals against the State of West Bengal.

criminal other Procedural Criminal Appeal Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Registry Report Procedural Correction

Lalitha Theresa Sequeria v. Dolfy A Pias @ Adolphys

09 Oct 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld a compromise decree based on an oral partition and Will among Christian heirs, rejecting claims of fraud and inapplicability of the Urban Land Ceiling Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 compromise decree oral partition Christian succession law

Shanti Devi v. Rajesh Kumar Jain & Anr.

09 Oct 2014 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal granting conditional leave to defend the eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act upon raising a triable issue regarding the landlord's bonafide requirement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction petition leave to defend bonafide requirement

Shree Shyamji Transport Company v. Food Corporation of India

09 Oct 2014 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that FCI was not justified in rejecting the appellants' tender by invoking disqualification clause after a prior judicial order held no debarment was intended, setting aside the High Court's dismissal of the appellants' writ petitions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Model Tender Form Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Disqualification Conditions

State of Orissa & Anr v. Fakir Charan Sethi

09 Oct 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that only actual cultivators (raiyats) in possession on the date of vesting under the Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951, are entitled to tenancy rights, and dismissed the plaintiffs' claim due to failure to prove such possession and cultivation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Orissa Estate Abolition Act, 1951 Section 8(1) raiyat tenancy rights

Board of Trustees of the Port of Kolkata v. Kalipada Bhakat

09 Oct 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that an unauthorized occupant who took possession after eviction proceedings against the original tenant cannot maintain an appeal under the Public Premises Act, setting aside the High Court's order allowing condonation of delay and leave to appeal.

property appeal_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 locus standi eviction proceedings unauthorized occupant

Gangai Vinayagar Temple v. Meenakshi Ammal

09 Oct 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that failure to appeal against connected suits decided by a common judgment bars reopening of title disputes under the doctrine of res judicata, affirming the Trust's ownership and sale of the property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Section 11 CPC Section 116 Evidence Act public trust

General Motors (India) Private Limited v. Ashok Ramnik Lal Tolat & Anr.

09 Oct 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the finding of unfair trade practice and refund relief but set aside punitive damages awarded without claim or notice, emphasizing fair procedure under the Consumer Protection Act.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant unfair trade practice punitive damages Consumer Protection Act, 1986 refund

Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr. v. Kausarbag Coop. Housing Society

09 Oct 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; M.Y. Eqbal
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a cooperative housing society is entitled to Transferable Development Rights under the MRTP Act and relevant Development Control Regulations for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, rejecting the State's attempt to deny such rights via an administrative order.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Transferable Development Rights Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act Development Control Regulations Land Acquisition Act

Sultan Singh v. State of Haryana

26 Sep 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for dowry death under Section 304-B IPC, affirming the presumption of guilt under Section 113-B Evidence Act where the deceased was harassed for dowry soon before her unnatural death.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 113-B Evidence Act

Patel Maheshbhai Ranchodbhai and others v. State of Gujarat

26 Sep 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal and conviction of appellants for cruelty and abetment to suicide based on a reliable dying declaration and reappreciation of evidence, emphasizing the duty of courts and prosecution to ensure justice.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 306 IPC Section 498A IPC reversal of acquittal

Anup Lal Yadav & Anr. v. State of Bihar

26 Sep 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Section 149 IPC, holding that membership in an unlawful assembly sharing a common object suffices for criminal liability even without proof of individual overt acts.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object vicarious liability

Liyakat and Another v. State of Rajasthan

26 Sep 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that defective examination of accused under Section 313 CrPC does not automatically vitiate trial unless prejudice is shown, setting aside the High Court's remand order and directing it to decide the appeal on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC examination of accused prejudice remand for retrial

Nirmal Singh v. State of Haryana

26 Sep 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition by applying deductions for developmental charges on sale instances of smaller plots, affirming principles for just valuation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation enhancement market value developmental charges deduction

City Industrial Development Corporation v. Popcorn Entertainment Corporation

26 Sep 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court upheld CIDCO's cancellation of land allotments made without public tender, holding such arbitrary allotments opposed to public policy and violative of constitutional principles.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant land allotment public auction tender arbitrariness

Madras Bar Association v. Union of India

25 Sep 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; J. Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri; Rohinton F...

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005, focusing on whether transferring tax appellate jurisdiction from High Courts to a specialized tribunal violates the basic structure of the Constitution.

constitutional other Significant National Tax Tribunal Act, 2005 constitutional validity judicial review High Court jurisdiction

Mukesh v. State of Chhattisgarh

25 Sep 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for rape based on credible sole testimony of the prosecutrix despite minor contradictions and delay in FIR, emphasizing the totality of evidence and social realities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC sole testimony delay in FIR

Rungta Engineering College, Bhilai & Another v. Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University & Another

25 Sep 2014 · Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that AICTE has exclusive jurisdiction over technical education standards and set aside the State University’s refusal to grant affiliation to a college approved by AICTE, directing affiliation to be granted.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant AICTE affiliation technical education State University

Surinder Singh v. Punjab State Electricity Board, Patiala

25 Sep 2014 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that creamy layer exclusion for backward class reservation must be based on parental income alone, setting aside the High Court's order that included the individual's income and restoring the appellant's appointment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant creamy layer backward class reservation income criteria

The Stock Exchange, Bombay v. V.S. Kandalgaonkar & Ors.

25 Sep 2014 · R.M. Lodha; Kurian Joseph; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that Stock Exchange membership rights are personal privileges not attachable by the Income Tax Department, but other securities deposited by a defaulter member are attachable and recoverable for tax dues, with government debts having priority over unsecured creditors.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Stock Exchange membership personal privilege Income Tax Act Section 226 garnishee notice