Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Census Commissioner & Others v. R. Krishnamurthy

07 Nov 2014 · Dipak Misra; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that courts cannot direct the conduct of caste-wise census beyond Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, emphasizing judicial restraint and upholding the Central Government's exclusive policy-making power under the Census Act.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant judicial restraint caste-wise census Census Act 1940 policy decision

Dr. Balwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police

07 Nov 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that the State must prevent nuisance and noise pollution caused by protests near a citizen's residence to protect fundamental rights under Article 21, directing strict compliance with prior noise pollution guidelines and Human Rights Commission orders.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 21 noise pollution nuisance right to peaceful living

E. Bapanaiah v. Sri K.S. Raju

07 Nov 2014 · Vikramajit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court restored the conviction of a promoter director for wilful disobedience of Company Law Board orders, holding him personally liable for contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Company Law Board wilful disobedience undertaking to court

M/s Transport Corporation of India Ltd. v. M/s Ganesh Polytex Ltd.

05 Nov 2014 · Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the National Commission's order holding the transporter liable for non-delivery of export consignments due to failure to prove lawful delivery and production of bogus documents.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Customs Act, 1962 Bill of Export Export Report

State of U.P. v. Shashi Joshi

03 Nov 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court modified a Labour Court Award by directing reinstatement of a daily wager without back wages, balancing equitable considerations in a service termination dispute.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant daily wager termination reinstatement back wages

Hari Om v. State of Haryana & Another

31 Oct 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for dowry death but reduced the appellant's life sentence to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment, emphasizing sentencing discretion under Section 304-B IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC life imprisonment

Kala Devi & Ors. v. Bhagwan Das Chauhan & Ors.

31 Oct 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel · (2013) 9 SCC 166

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by correctly assessing the deceased's income based on minimum wages and awarding adequate amounts for loss of consortium, love and affection, funeral expenses, and loss of estate.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency minimum wages compensation enhancement

Nand Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh

31 Oct 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder under Sections 302, 148, and 149 IPC, affirming that members of an unlawful assembly are vicariously liable for offences committed in prosecution of the common object, and reliable testimony of close relatives can sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC vicarious liability eyewitness testimony

B.D. Khunte v. Union of India

30 Oct 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction, holding that a seven-hour gap between assault and killing negated the claim of grave and sudden provocation under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC grave and sudden provocation murder loss of self-control

Binod Kumar & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr.

30 Oct 2014 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 406 IPC for non-payment of contract dues, holding that mere retention of money without dishonest intention does not constitute criminal breach of trust.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal breach of trust Section 406 IPC quashing of complaint Section 482 CrPC

B.D. Khunte v. Union of India

30 Oct 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of an army jawan, ruling that a seven-hour gap between alleged provocation and killing negated the benefit of grave and sudden provocation under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant grave and sudden provocation Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC murder culpable homicide

Mallella Shyamsunder v. State of Andhra Pradesh

29 Oct 2014 · VikramaJit Sen; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on reliable dying declarations and circumstantial evidence, rejecting the appellant's claim of self-infliction and reducing the charge.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC murder dowry harassment

Zarina Siddiqui v. A. Ramalingam alias R. Amarnathan

29 Oct 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court allowed specific performance of a registered agreement of sale executed under a valid power of attorney, imposing a condition to compensate for price escalation, and emphasized proper exercise of discretion and independent appellate review.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance power of attorney registered agreement to sell discretion under Specific Relief Act

Rathnavathi v. Kavita Ganashamdas

29 Oct 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance and permanent injunction, holding that the second suit was not barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC or limitation, and affirmed the plaintiff's entitlement to relief upon full payment and possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance Order II Rule 2 CPC cause of action limitation

Inbasegaran v. S. Natarajan

29 Oct 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent suit for specific performance is not barred under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC if based on a distinct cause of action from an earlier suit for injunction, and remanded the matter for further consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 2 Rule 2 CPC cause of action specific performance injunction

Munni @ Syed Akbar v. State of Inspector Of Police

29 Oct 2014 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of the appellant based on conclusive forensic evidence of strangulation, rejecting the suicide theory.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant strangulation homicide suicide theory postmortem report

HUDA & Anr. v. Kedar Nath

29 Oct 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that the auction purchaser's continuous default justified resumption of possession by the authority, disallowing compound interest beyond the agreed 10% and setting aside lower courts' lenient orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant auction sale default in payment interest rate compound interest

MANOJ I NAIK & ASSOCIATES v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

28 Oct 2014 · DIPAK MISRA; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN; UDAY UMESH LALIT

The Supreme Court upheld judicial discretion in rejecting undervalued offers for company liquidation assets and supervised a fair auction process securing maximum realization in public interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant company liquidation auction Official Liquidator judicial discretion

Kulwant Singh v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

28 Oct 2014 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a valid driving licence for a light motor vehicle authorizes driving a light goods vehicle, and absence of specific endorsement does not entitle the insurer to recovery rights against the insured.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insurance policy breach Driving licence validity Light motor vehicle Light goods vehicle

Darius Rutton Kavasmaneck v. Gharda Chemicals Limited & Others

28 Oct 2014 · Chelameswar; A.K. Sikri

The Supreme Court held that the 2000 amendment to the Companies Act did not abolish hybrid companies or invalidate pre-emption rights in their Articles, affirming the binding nature of such contractual shareholder rights despite the company's deemed public status.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant hybrid company deemed public company pre-emption clause Articles of Association