Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Archana Girish Sabnis v. Bar Council of India

26 Nov 2014 · M.Y. Eqbal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the Bar Council of India's authority to recognize educational qualifications for advocate enrollment, dismissing the appellant's claim that her LCEH qualification is equivalent to a graduation degree.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Bar Council of India Advocates Act, 1961 enrollment as advocate equivalence of educational qualification

SITA RAM v. STATE OF HARYANA

25 Nov 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years of the award, and quashed acquisition of appellant's land accordingly.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act 2013 Compensation Lapse of acquisition proceedings

M/S. HYDER CONSULTING (UK) LTD. v. GOVERNOR, STATE OF ORISSA

25 Nov 2014 · H.L. Dattu; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that under Section 31(7) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arbitral tribunals cannot award interest on interest or compound interest unless expressly agreed or provided in the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(7) interest on interest compound interest

SRI SIDHHARTH VIYAS v. RAVI NATH MISRA

25 Nov 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that acquisition of alternative accommodation by a tenant or family member before the rent control Act's applicability triggers deemed vacancy under Section 12(3), overruling the High Court's contrary view.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 12(3) Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings Act deemed vacancy rent control legislation statutory interpretation

Motilal Yadav v. State of Bihar

25 Nov 2014 · Vikramajit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the kidnapping conviction despite absence of test identification parade, holding that reliable court identification and corroborated evidence suffice to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping Section 364A IPC test identification parade court identification

Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority

25 Nov 2014 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. F. Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the arbitral award in favor of the contractor, holding that judicial review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited and the Division Bench erred in reappreciating evidence and setting aside claims without valid grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act Judicial review Public policy

Jagdish & Ors. v. State of Uttaranchal

25 Nov 2014 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld dowry death convictions of two appellants with reduced sentences, acquitted one from dowry death charge but convicted him under cruelty, emphasizing the application of Section 113B presumption and evidentiary standards in dowry death cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 113B Evidence Act dowry harassment

Calcutta Port Trust v. Anadi Kumar Das

24 Nov 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court clarified that pension arrears must be paid from the date of the employee's application to switch schemes, directing partial payment considering the employer's financial position.

civil other Significant pension arrears Calcutta Port Trust CPF scheme pension scheme

High Court of Gujarat v. Hitendra Vrajlal Ashara

24 Nov 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in setting aside a valid disciplinary inquiry and reinstating a judicial officer, emphasizing the limited scope of High Court's powers under Articles 226 and 227.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India disciplinary inquiry Labour Court ex-parte award

Manoharlal v. State of M.P.

21 Nov 2014 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to the improbability of the victim's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing that sole testimony must inspire confidence to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration benefit of doubt

Naim and Another v. State of Uttarakhand

21 Nov 2014 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of co-accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, holding that shared common intention makes all participants liable for murder even if only one inflicts the fatal blow.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention murder

Sri Srikanta D.N. Wadiyar v. State of Karnataka

21 Nov 2014 · Vikramajit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court permitted the State of Karnataka to widen roads adjoining Bangalore Palace by utilizing palace land, subject to granting Transfer Development Rights to the appellants as equitable compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Bangalore Palace Acquisition Road widening Transfer Development Rights Public interest

The Principal Govt. Pre-University College & Anr. v. Jambu Kumar Mutha

20 Nov 2014 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed appeals against the High Court's procedural dismissal, condoned delay, and remitted the property title dispute for merits hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay appeal maintainability unauthorized construction title dispute

R. Rajanna v. S.R. Venkataswamy

20 Nov 2014 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that a compromise decree can only be challenged before the Court which passed it and barred a separate suit to set aside such decree under Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise decree Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Order XXIII Rule 3A CPC challenge to compromise

Baljinder Kaur v. State of Punjab

19 Nov 2014 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's dowry death conviction under Section 304B IPC due to lack of proximate dowry harassment but convicted her under Section 498A IPC for cruelty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC dying declaration

D.R. Somayajulu, Secretary D.L.S. & Other S.E. Railway House Bldg. Co-Op Society Ltd. v. Attili Appala Swamy

19 Nov 2014 · T.S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that active participation of legal heirs in land ceiling proceedings cures non-service of formal notice to a deceased declarant and that possession prior to repeal excludes applicability of the Urban Land Ceiling Repeal Act, remitting the matter for fresh consideration.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 surplus land legal heirs

Rajkot Distt Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. State of Gujarat

19 Nov 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 3-A(8) and (9) empowering the Collector to delimit constituencies for cooperative society elections, dismissing challenges to the statutory scheme ensuring democratic representation under the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 Rule 3-A(8) and (9) Delimitation of constituencies Collector's powers

Rakesh Baban Borhade v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.

19 Nov 2014 · V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant in a commercial cheating case, emphasizing the discretionary nature of bail and the need for detailed investigation to establish dishonest intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. commercial dispute memorandum of understanding

Union of India v. P. Gunasekaran

19 Nov 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court cannot reappreciate evidence in departmental disciplinary proceedings if there is legal evidence supporting the findings and upheld the punishment of compulsory retirement imposed on the respondent for falsification of official records.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry disciplinary proceedings reappreciation of evidence Article 226

K. Srinivas v. K. Sunita

19 Nov 2014 · VikramaJit Sen; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that filing a false criminal complaint by a spouse constitutes matrimonial cruelty warranting divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

family appeal_allowed Significant matrimonial cruelty false criminal complaint Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1)(ia)