Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

M/S. K.R.C.D. (I) PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

23 Apr 2015 · A. K. Sikri; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that royalty payable by a copyright owner to a music producer is not includible in the assessable value of duplicate CDs sold exclusively to the copyright owner for excise duty purposes.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Valuation Royalty Copyright Assessable Value

Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Aurangabad v. M/S Roofit Industries Ltd.

23 Apr 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that for excise valuation, the place of removal depends on contract terms and ownership transfer, requiring inclusion of freight and insurance charges when delivery occurs at the buyer's premises.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Excise Act valuation place of removal freight and insurance charges transfer of ownership

K. Devakimma v. Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams

23 Apr 2015 · VikramaJit Sen; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court's enhanced compensation award for land acquired by the State for TTD, holding that reasonable escalation based on prior awards is valid and the High Court erred in reducing compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation fair market value escalation in land value

Pradyumna Mukund Kokil v. State of Maharashtra

22 Apr 2015 · Anil R. Dave; V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that a government authority cannot claim adverse possession over private land to avoid due process and reduce compensation during land acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant adverse possession land acquisition government authority Municipal Corporation

M/s Cochin Port Trust v. State of Kerala

22 Apr 2015 · H.L. Dattu; R.K. Agrawal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that the Cochin Port Trust is a "dealer" under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 and liable to pay sales tax on sales of scrap and other goods, rejecting reliance on the Madras Port Trust case under the Tamil Nadu Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant dealer definition Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 sales tax liability

Makhan Singh v. State of Haryana

21 Apr 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 15 of the NDPS Act due to failure to prove nexus between accused and vehicle from which contraband was seized and improper reliance on official witnesses alone.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 15 NDPS Section 50 NDPS search and seizure

ONGC LTD. v. PETROLEUM COAL LABOUR UNION & ORS.

17 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award directing ONGC to regularise workmen employed on temporary basis, holding that irregular appointments can be regularised to remedy unfair labour practices without violating Article 14.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant regularisation industrial dispute unfair labour practice Certified Standing Orders

Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

17 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; S.A. Bobde
Cites 14 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under Section 18 of the NDPS Act for possession of opium as a continuing offence, clarifying the concept of possession and procedural compliance requirements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant possession NDPS Act continuing offence Section 18 NDPS Act

Monju Roy & Ors. v. State of West Bengal

17 Apr 2015 · T. S. Thakur; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the dowry death convictions of the husband's siblings due to lack of specific evidence of harassment, emphasizing careful scrutiny of omnibus allegations under Section 304B IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC harassment

H. Lakshmaiah Reddy v. L. Venkatesh Reddy

17 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that mutation entries do not affect title and restored the lower appellate court's decree recognizing equal ownership of the suit property between the plaintiff and first defendant as class-I heirs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mutation entry title possession Hindu Succession Act

Ashapura Mine-Chem Ltd. v. Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation

16 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause in a terminated MoU is an independent and enforceable agreement, allowing appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement separability Section 11 Arbitration Act Memorandum of Understanding

Gauri Shanker v. State of Rajasthan

16 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court restored the Labour Court's award of reinstatement with back wages to a workman illegally retrenched in violation of mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the High Court's interference and compensation in lieu of reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act retrenchment Labour Court reinstatement

CONTROL PRINT LIMITED & ANR v. NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ORS

16 Apr 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging seizure of imported controlled substances without NoC, deferring to pending criminal proceedings under the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed No Objection Certificate Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act import of controlled substances seizure of goods

Bivash Chandra Debnath v. State of West Bengal

16 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court reduced the appellants' conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding that the offence occurred in a sudden fight without premeditation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC Unlawful assembly Culpable homicide

Ashwani Kumar v. State of Punjab

16 Apr 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld convictions based on reliable eyewitness identification corroborated by extra judicial confession, recoveries, and telephonic evidence, while rejecting issue estoppel and acquitting one accused due to insufficient evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant identification evidence extra judicial confession test identification parade adverse inference

Vinay & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

16 Apr 2015 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for causing grievous injuries with deadly weapons, reduced sentences to time served, and enhanced fines with compensation to victims in a familial assault case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 326 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 357 CrPC right of private defense

Central Bank of India v. Jagbir Singh

16 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant · AIR 2015 SC 290
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a financier bank's liability to insure a vehicle ends once the vehicle is delivered to the owner, and set aside consumer forum orders holding the bank liable for compensation due to non-renewal of insurance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant liability of financier bank vehicle insurance renewal hypothecation agreement Motor Vehicles Act 1988

WIPRO LTD v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

16 Apr 2015 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a Customs Valuation Rule mandating a fixed 1% addition for handling charges irrespective of actual ascertainable costs is ultra vires the Customs Act and violative of Article 14, allowing the appeal and reading down the proviso to apply only when actual charges are not ascertainable.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Customs Valuation Loading, unloading and handling charges Proviso (ii) of Rule 9(2) Customs Act, 1962 Section 14

CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPOTRATION v. SARPANCH, GRAM PANCHAYAT

16 Apr 2015 · Anil R. Dave; Madan B. Lokur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that properties situated within Gram Panchayat limits are liable for property tax despite vesting in CIDCO, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

civil appeal_dismissed property tax Gram Panchayat territorial jurisdiction Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966

Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra

15 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Abhay Manohar Sapre
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the applicability of MCOCA against the appellants in the Malegaon blast case, affirming the denial of bail and clarifying the requirements for invoking MCOCA provisions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 continuing unlawful activity organized crime organized crime syndicate