Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

M/S. IVRCL INFRASTRUCTURE & PROJECTS LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI

15 Apr 2015 · A.K. Sikri; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that customs duty exemption applies only to the import of a complete hot mix plant, not its components, and dismissed the appellant's claim for exemption.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant customs duty exemption hot mix plant complete plant components vs complete goods

Gujarat Maritime Board v. G.C. Pandya

13 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that while the departmental enquiry and punishment were rightly set aside, the promotion claim must be reconsidered by the employer rather than granted outright retrospectively.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC Departmental enquiry Promotion Substantial question of law

C. Chandrasekaraiah v. State of Karnataka

13 Apr 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a police officer for accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, affirming the High Court's interference with the Trial Court's acquittal based on proper appreciation of evidence and presumption under Section 20.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 20 presumption demand and acceptance of bribe appeal against acquittal

Ganga Dhar Kalita v. State of Assam

13 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to quash criminal proceedings for alleged forgery in a property dispute, holding that pending civil suits do not bar criminal prosecution where the FIR discloses cognizable offences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings forgery power of attorney

Inspector of Police v. Battenapatla Venkata Ratnam

13 Apr 2015 · Kurian Joseph; Adarsh Kumar Goel
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that sanction under Section 197 CrPC is not required for prosecuting public servants accused of criminal misconduct not committed in discharge of official duties and set aside the quashing of proceedings for lack of sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC sanction for prosecution public servant criminal misconduct

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, AHMEDABAD v. M/S. ESSAR STEEL LTD

13 Apr 2015 · A. K. Sikri; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that payments for post-importation technical consultancy services not constituting a condition of sale are excluded from customs valuation under Rule 9(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant customs valuation technical consultancy fees post-importation services Rule 9(1)(e)

Laxmi v. Union of India

10 Apr 2015 · Madan B. Lokur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court directed States and Union Territories to ensure minimum compensation, free medical treatment, ban over-the-counter acid sales, and utilize District Legal Services Authorities for victim compensation in acid attack cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant acid attack victim compensation Section 357C CrPC free medical treatment

Raja @ Rajinder v. State of Haryana

10 Apr 2015 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and admissible discovery under Section 27, dismissing the appellant's challenge to his murder conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 27 Indian Evidence Act disclosure statement

State of Rajasthan v. Surja Ram

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction of Surja Ram, holding that contradictions in cross-examination did not absolve him of equal participation in the crime under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 201 IPC Section 34 IPC murder

State of Rajasthan v. Sampat Ram and others

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and insufficient identification evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness identification benefit of doubt unlawful assembly Section 302 IPC

Swapna Sukumar & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

10 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court dismissed I.A. No. 6/2015 as not pressed and allowed I.A. No. 7/2015 in terms of prayer 'a' in Civil Appeal Nos. 226-227/2015.

civil other Procedural interlocutory application I.A. No. 6/2015 I.A. No. 7/2015 civil appeal

Ms. S v. Sunil Kumar & Anr.

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that identification of an accused by a prosecutrix for the first time in court is reliable and can sustain conviction despite absence of a test identification parade, allowing the appeal and convicting the accused under Section 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant identification parade sexual assault prosecutrix identification test identification parade

MD. JAMILUDDIN NASIR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

10 Apr 2015 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court allowed certain Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions related to criminal appeals from West Bengal and directed necessary corrections.

criminal other Procedural Criminal Appeal Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Supreme Court of India Order

Payal Chawla Singh v. The Coca-Cola Co. & Anr.

10 Apr 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner’s employment contract did not incorporate the arbitration clause of the "solutions programme" and dismissed her petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an arbitrator.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement employment contract solutions programme Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Mahadeo Gadekar

10 Apr 2015 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the reliability of a medically certified dying declaration to convict accused of murder and outraging modesty, overturning the High Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 354 IPC burn injuries

Ranga Nath Mishra v. State of Uttar Pradesh

10 Apr 2015 · Ranjan Gogoi; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Lokayukta's investigation and report against a former minister, ruling that procedural defects were cured and the Lokayukta acted within its discretionary powers under the U.P. Lokayukta Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Lokayukta Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta Act complaint maintainability affidavit requirement

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State of Maharashtra Thr. STF. CBI, Mumbai

09 Apr 2015 · Anil R. Dave; J. Chelameswar; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition filed by Yakub Abdul Razak Memon, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified interference with the earlier judgment in the criminal appeal.

criminal petition_dismissed review petition Supreme Court criminal appeal error apparent on face of record

Yunus Zia v. State of Karnataka & Anr.

09 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the Lokayukta Police's jurisdiction to suo-motu register and investigate an FIR against a non-public servant under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, dismissing the appeal but directing transfer of investigation to the State's Corps of Detectives for impartial inquiry.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Lokayukta Act, 1984 suo-motu FIR jurisdiction of Lokayukta Police Section 482 CrPC

Gauri Shankar Pd. Rai v. Sajal Chakroborty

09 Apr 2015 · V. Gopala Gowda; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court directed full compliance with its earlier order by regularising petitioners' services from 1981, holding partial compliance insufficient and warning of contempt for wilful disobedience.

administrative other Significant regularisation of service contempt of court wilful disobedience Junior Engineers

P. Pramila and others v. State of Karnataka and another

09 Apr 2015 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that criminal complaints under the Air Act must be filed by the Board or its authorized officer, and unauthorized delegation of this power invalidates the proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 Section 43(1) delegation of authority complaint filing