Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

Senior Divisional Commercial Manager v. S.C.R. Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Stalls Welfare Association

29 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of existing railway catering licensees to renewal under the 2010 Catering Policy, affirming their constitutional right to livelihood and striking down arbitrary denial of renewal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Catering Policy 2010 license renewal right to livelihood Article 21

Union of India v. Mohanlal & Anr.

28 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court clarified and mandated strict compliance with statutory procedures under Section 52A of the NDPS Act for seizure, sampling, storage, and disposal of narcotic drugs, directing establishment of adequate storage facilities and judicial supervision to prevent pilferage and ensure timely destruction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A seizure of narcotics sampling procedure

Sachchidanand Gupta v. State of U.P.

28 Jan 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court recalled its earlier appointment of Justice Virendra Singh as Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta due to misrepresentation and lack of consensus, appointing Justice Sanjay Misra instead.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Lokayukta appointment Article 142 Constitution Chief Justice opinion consultative process

Kasthuri Radhakrishnan v. M. Chinniyan

28 Jan 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that eviction petitions under Rent Control laws are maintainable without joining all co-owners and tenancy created by a power of attorney holder binds the principal, restoring eviction of tenant on grounds of default and bona fide need.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction petition co-owners power of attorney landlord-tenant relationship

Union of India v. Mohanlal & Anr.

28 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court clarified statutory procedures under the NDPS Act for seizure, sampling, storage, and disposal of narcotics, mandated adequate storage facilities and judicial supervision, and directed prompt disposal to prevent pilferage and recirculation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A seizure of narcotics sampling procedure

Bharat Aluminium Company v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc.

28 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Amitava Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where parties choose foreign law and seat for arbitration, Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act is excluded, and Indian courts lack jurisdiction to set aside foreign arbitral awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Part I exclusion foreign law governing arbitration seat of arbitration

Don Ayengia v. The State of Assam

28 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that cheques issued as security for an acknowledged debt can be presented for payment and dishonour thereof attracts liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque promissory note acknowledgement of debt

Vipinchandra Vadilal Bavishi v. State of Gujarat

28 Jan 2016 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the State failed to lawfully acquire possession of certain land plots under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, entitling appellants to retain possession post the 1999 Repeal Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act possession corrigendum statutory notification

State of Rajasthan v. Ram Kailash alias Ram Vilas

28 Jan 2016 · M.Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that transferred malice applies even if the accused did not know the exact victim, rejecting the High Court's reduction to culpable homicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC Transferred malice Doctrine of transferred malice

Bihar State Electricity Board v. M/s. Bhola Ram Steel Pvt. Ltd.

28 Jan 2016 · Arun Mishra; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that MDI meter readings reliably establish excess electricity consumption beyond contracted load, validating the Electricity Board's demand and rejecting the High Court's quashing of the same.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maximum Demand Indicator meter MDI meter contract demand connected load

The Manager, VKNM Vocational Higher Secondary School v. The State of Kerala

27 Jan 2016 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that preferential appointment under amended Rule 7A(3) and Rule 51A requires prior engagement for one full academic year, denying such claim based on short-term prior service and setting aside the Kerala High Court Full Bench judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant preferential appointment Rule 51A Kerala Education Rules Rule 7A(3) amendment vested rights

Jivana Devi Yogendra Nath Adhar v. Vimal Kumar Dayaram Makane(Roy)

27 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that custody disputes must be decided by the Family Court and continued the interim stay of custody orders until the Family Court delivers its final decision.

family appeal_dismissed custody dispute Family Court jurisdiction interim custody order welfare of the child

INDIAN MACHINERY COMPANY v. M/S. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD.

27 Jan 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that a second complaint under the Consumer Protection Act is maintainable if the first complaint was dismissed for default, and set aside the National Commission's order rejecting the second complaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 second complaint dismissal for default non-prosecution

Asha Shrichand Raheja v. Purushotam Vishandas Raheja

27 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court directed the Bombay High Court to expeditiously dispose of the probate appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits, disposing of the civil appeal with no order as to costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural probate interim stay sole caveat appeal

JIVANA DEVI YOGENDRA NATH ADHAR v. VIMAL KUMAR DAYARAM MAKANE(ROY)

27 Jan 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; SHIVA KIRTI SINGH

The Supreme Court upheld the interim custody order pending final adjudication by the Family Court and directed parties to abide by the Family Court's final decision.

family appeal_dismissed child custody interim custody order Family Court jurisdiction custody dispute

Heera Lal v. State of Haryana & Ors.

22 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court declined to reopen the merits of land acquisition after delay but directed allotment of a plot under the Government's Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy with compensation for delay.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 5-A inquiry Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy compensation

Pooja Pal v. Union of India

22 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking CBI investigation into the murder of a sitting MLA, holding that multiple state investigations suffice absent credible evidence of bias or mala fide.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant CBI investigation murder of MLA police complicity witness protection

Indra Kaur & Ors. v. Royal Sundram Alliance Ins. Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal permitting the claimants to proceed against both the offending vehicle and insurer under the Motor Vehicles Act, directing the Tribunal to decide the compensation claim on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Workmen's Compensation Motor Vehicles Act Compensation claim Insurance company liability

Jashoda Kumari Pradhan & Anr. v. The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

22 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court restored the award of compensation with interest to the legal heirs of a deceased workman under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, setting aside the High Court's deletion of interest.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 interest on compensation legal heirs compensation award

LAL CHAND LOHIA v. STATE OF HARYANA

22 Jan 2016 · ANIL R. DAVE; ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the land acquisition dispute to the High Court for fresh consideration of the purpose of acquisition and adequacy of rehabilitation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 4 notification Land Acquisition Act 1894 rehabilitation