Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

State of Rajasthan v. Gotan Lime Stone Khanji Udyog Pvt. Ltd.

20 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that a disguised sale of mining lease via corporate restructuring and share transfer without statutory consent is void, applying the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil to uphold public interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant mining lease transfer corporate veil lifting Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules unauthorized transfer

M/S. J.K. CEMENT LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

20 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court disposed of the special leave petition filed by M/s. J.K. Cement Limited by referring to its judgment in a related civil appeal involving the State of Rajasthan.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural special leave to appeal civil appeal disposal of petition judicial economy

JAGATJIT INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD

20 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a trademark registration issued before the expiry of a validly extended opposition period is invalid and that the Registrar's suo motu powers to rectify the register under Section 57(4) are not barred by Section 125 when the applicant for rectification is not a party to the infringement suit.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 21 opposition Section 23 registration Section 57(4) suo motu powers

IRA BASU CHOWDHURY v. CALCUTTA METROPOLITAN DEV.AUTH.

20 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed the Reference Court to reconsider land value fixation with proper notice to the Requisitioning Authority, allowing the appeal and ensuring procedural fairness.

civil appeal_allowed land value fixation Requisitioning Authority notice Reference Court

Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare v. State of Maharashtra

20 Jan 2016 · Surya Kant
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for the brutal rape and murder of a 2-year-old child, affirming the reliability of DNA evidence and applying the 'rarest of rare' doctrine.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rarest of rare death penalty child rape and murder DNA evidence

Parveen v. State of Haryana

19 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and mandatory minimum seven-year sentence under Section 398 IPC for armed dacoity, dismissing the appeal challenging the sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 398 IPC minimum sentence dacoity with armed persons stolen vehicle

State of Gujarat v. Shree Ratnakar Enterprise

19 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the State's appeal, holding that delay and laches barred the respondent's claim for land allotment for salt production after establishment of a Special Economic Zone.

civil appeal_allowed land allotment delay and laches Special Economic Zone salt manufacturing

BOBBILI RAMAKRISHNA RAJU YADAV & ORS. v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

19 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; A.K. Sikri; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court quashed proceedings under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against appellants 2 to 6 for lack of specific allegations of entrustment and failure to return dowry, while upholding the independence of such proceedings from other dowry-related offences.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Dowry Prohibition Act Section 6 Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of complaint Section 482 CrPC

NANKAUNOO v. STATE OF U.P.

19 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; A.K. Sikri; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder where the injury was on a non-vital part without medical proof of its sufficiency to cause death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part 1 IPC intention to cause death sufficiency of injury

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S NCC- KNR (JV)

19 Jan 2016 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the respondent must pay 12% interest on the amount withdrawn under an arbitral award later set aside, from the date of withdrawal till repayment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal jurisdiction Interest on decretal amount Setting aside arbitral award Bank guarantee

Eastern Coalfields Ltd v. Misri Yadav

19 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court granted continuity of service and partial back wages to a reinstated workman dismissed for misconduct, clarifying the limits of Industrial Tribunal's jurisdiction on punishment substitution.

labor appeal_allowed Industrial Tribunal dismissal reinstatement continuity of service

M/s Metal Seam Co. of India (P) Ltd. v. M/s Avadh Delicacies

19 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, upheld cancellation of allotment to Surya Chemicals, set aside the appellant's allotment for lack of public auction, and directed fresh allotment through transparent tender process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant industrial shed allotment natural justice public auction tender process

S.P. Krishnappa v. Secretary, Department of Revenue

19 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court granted equitable relief by directing free allotment of alternative land to appellants in a land acquisition dispute, thereby settling the matter and barring further litigation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition equitable relief alternative land allotment land value increase

Surender @ Kala v. State of Haryana

19 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 18 of the NDPS Act, ruling that investigation by a police officer who is also the complainant does not invalidate prosecution if statutory safeguards are followed.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 18 NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act Investigation by complainant

Ramesh Chandra Bhandari v. Ram Singh Salal

18 Jan 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that after allowing eviction on bona fide need grounds, only a reasonable time (not two years) should be granted to vacate, modifying the High Court’s order accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction bona fide need U.P. Urban Buildings Act, 1972 Section 21(1)(a)

Chairman, Odisha Joint Entrance Examination v. Jasobanta Nayak and Others

18 Jan 2016 · Dipak Misra; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that only the Medical Board constituted under the prospectus can determine disability percentage for admission, setting aside the High Court's order relying on an unauthorized certificate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant physically handicapped category disability certificate Medical Board Odisha Joint Entrance Examination

M/S GANAPATHY & CO. v. THE COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX

18 Jan 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order disallowing certain income tax deductions due to lack of proof and sham transactions, affirming the limited scope of the High Court's reference jurisdiction under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 256(2) Section 40A(2) Section 35(2A)

M/s Boorugu Mahadev & Sons v. Sirigiri Narasing Rao

18 Jan 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and reversed the eviction order, restoring the first appellate court's decision allowing eviction based on proven ownership and landlord-tenant relationship.

civil appeal_allowed Significant rent control eviction petition revisional jurisdiction landlord-tenant relationship

ARUN MANOHAR DANGE AND ANR v. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

18 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a 75% deduction for development charges in land acquisition compensation was excessive and limited the deduction to 44%, ensuring fair compensation based on actual development and amenities.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition just compensation development charges deduction market value

State through Narcotics Control Bureau v. Yusuf @ Asif & Ors.

18 Jan 2016 · Arun Mishra; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that a minor clerical error in seal numbering does not vitiate the prosecution's case under the NDPS Act if the seized articles are otherwise properly identified and sent for chemical analysis, and remitted the case for fresh consideration.

criminal other Significant NDPS Act seal discrepancy chemical analysis chain of custody