Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

State of Rajasthan v. Ram Kailash alias Ram Vilas

28 Jan 2016 · M.Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court restored the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, holding that transferred malice applies even if the accused did not know the exact victim, rejecting the High Court's reduction to culpable homicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-I IPC Transferred malice Doctrine of transferred malice

Bihar State Electricity Board v. M/s. Bhola Ram Steel Pvt. Ltd.

28 Jan 2016 · Arun Mishra; M.Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that MDI meter readings reliably establish excess electricity consumption beyond contracted load, validating the Electricity Board's demand and rejecting the High Court's quashing of the same.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maximum Demand Indicator meter MDI meter contract demand connected load

The Manager, VKNM Vocational Higher Secondary School v. The State of Kerala

27 Jan 2016 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that preferential appointment under amended Rule 7A(3) and Rule 51A requires prior engagement for one full academic year, denying such claim based on short-term prior service and setting aside the Kerala High Court Full Bench judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant preferential appointment Rule 51A Kerala Education Rules Rule 7A(3) amendment vested rights

Jivana Devi Yogendra Nath Adhar v. Vimal Kumar Dayaram Makane(Roy)

27 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that custody disputes must be decided by the Family Court and continued the interim stay of custody orders until the Family Court delivers its final decision.

family appeal_dismissed custody dispute Family Court jurisdiction interim custody order welfare of the child

INDIAN MACHINERY COMPANY v. M/S. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD.

27 Jan 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that a second complaint under the Consumer Protection Act is maintainable if the first complaint was dismissed for default, and set aside the National Commission's order rejecting the second complaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 second complaint dismissal for default non-prosecution

Asha Shrichand Raheja v. Purushotam Vishandas Raheja

27 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court directed the Bombay High Court to expeditiously dispose of the probate appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits, disposing of the civil appeal with no order as to costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural probate interim stay sole caveat appeal

JIVANA DEVI YOGENDRA NATH ADHAR v. VIMAL KUMAR DAYARAM MAKANE(ROY)

27 Jan 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; SHIVA KIRTI SINGH

The Supreme Court upheld the interim custody order pending final adjudication by the Family Court and directed parties to abide by the Family Court's final decision.

family appeal_dismissed child custody interim custody order Family Court jurisdiction custody dispute

Heera Lal v. State of Haryana & Ors.

22 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court declined to reopen the merits of land acquisition after delay but directed allotment of a plot under the Government's Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy with compensation for delay.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 5-A inquiry Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy compensation

Pooja Pal v. Union of India

22 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking CBI investigation into the murder of a sitting MLA, holding that multiple state investigations suffice absent credible evidence of bias or mala fide.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant CBI investigation murder of MLA police complicity witness protection

Indra Kaur & Ors. v. Royal Sundram Alliance Ins. Co. Ltd. & Anr.

22 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal permitting the claimants to proceed against both the offending vehicle and insurer under the Motor Vehicles Act, directing the Tribunal to decide the compensation claim on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Workmen's Compensation Motor Vehicles Act Compensation claim Insurance company liability

Jashoda Kumari Pradhan & Anr. v. The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

22 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court restored the award of compensation with interest to the legal heirs of a deceased workman under the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, setting aside the High Court's deletion of interest.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 interest on compensation legal heirs compensation award

LAL CHAND LOHIA v. STATE OF HARYANA

22 Jan 2016 · ANIL R. DAVE; ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the land acquisition dispute to the High Court for fresh consideration of the purpose of acquisition and adequacy of rehabilitation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 4 notification Land Acquisition Act 1894 rehabilitation

Raj Kumar v. Asstt. General Manager, State Bank of India

22 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation from Rs. 75,000 to Rs. 2,00,000 in lieu of reinstatement for an employee with intermittent service from 1984 to 1993, allowing the appeal and directing payment within six weeks.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Labour Court reinstatement compensation employment dispute

M/S KARNATAKA POWER TRANS.CORP.LTD v. M/S SOUTH INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASS

21 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous due to sale of the disputed machinery and upheld the remand order by the Appellate Tribunal, rejecting objections on maintainability of cross objections.

civil appeal_dismissed infructuous appeal remand Appellate Tribunal Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission

Madhukanta M. Chinchani v. Special Land Acquisition Officer

21 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that appellants are entitled to compensation at Rs. 130 per square meter for their land with road frontage, applying the principle of parity with adjoining lands.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation principle of parity road frontage

Dhiren Dave v. M/s. Surat Dyes & Ors.

21 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside contempt and prosecution proceedings against a Company Secretary who tendered an unconditional apology for unintentional wrong averments in court affidavits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC Contempt of Courts Act Company Secretaries Act unconditional apology

The Kelvin Jute Co. Ltd. v. Krishna Kumar Agarwala

21 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's order directing payment of provident fund dues despite the merger of the company, granting a further three months for compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed Provident Fund dues Merger BIFR scheme High Court order

Satish Kumar v. Karan Singh

21 Jan 2016 · M.Y. Eqbal; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that a decree for specific performance cannot be granted on a conditional agreement involving a non-transferable DDA plot, setting aside the lower courts' decrees and ordering refund with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance valid contract enforceability Specific Relief Act

VENKATESH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. KARNATAKA VIDYUTH KARKHANE LIMITED

20 Jan 2016 · T.S. THAKUR; A.K. SIKRI; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's decree awarding compensation for extra construction work done due to changed site conditions, rejecting the High Court's reliance on contractual clause requiring prior written consent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant construction contract extra work contractual variation prior written consent

Union of India & Anr. v. HBL Nife Power Systems Ltd.

20 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that procurement of critical defence items like submarine batteries must follow the Government's DGQA-supervised development policy and set aside the High Court's order directing open tendering.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant defence procurement submarine batteries Director General Quality Assurance DGQA