Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

LAXMI SNACKS PVT. LTD v. AKSHAR FOOD PRODUCTS

01 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court disposed of civil appeals by enforcing a mediation-based settlement agreement, directing partial decrees and striking off suits without remanding to the trial court.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural settlement agreement mediation trade dress dispute label infringement

Mukul Sarma v. Sabita Chakraborty

01 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's alimony amounts but allowed the appellant more time to pay in installments, warning of contempt for defaults.

family appeal_dismissed permanent alimony payment schedule High Court order Supreme Court

Giani Ram Mittal & Ors. v. M/s. RSPL Health Private Limited

01 Feb 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted the matter for a fresh hearing to ensure proper adjudication of the dispute involving product wrappers.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural remand fresh hearing product wrappers civil appeal

Educational Society, Tumsar v. State of Maharashtra

01 Feb 2016 · A.K. Sikri; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that in a 100% aided school, the management alone is liable to pay back wages for wrongful termination when the termination was without Government approval and statutory procedures were violated.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant aided school back wages termination Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act, 1977

Khursida Begum v. Mohammad Farooq

01 Feb 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court held that a registered gift deed transferring an undivided share in freehold property under tenancy is valid under Muslim Law when the right to collect rent is transferred, even without physical delivery of possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant gift deed hiba-bil-musha Muslim Law undivided share

M/S MADRAS PETROCHEM LTD. v. BIFR

29 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R.F. Nariman

The Supreme Court held that enforcement actions under the SARFAESI Act cause abatement of pending SICA references, with SARFAESI Act overriding SICA in secured debt recovery, validating winding up orders despite interim stays.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 BIFR reference abatement Section 15(1) proviso 3

Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala v. M/s K.T.C. Automobiles

29 Jan 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that the sale of motor vehicles occurs at the place of registration and dismissed the appeal against the penalty set aside by the High Court for lack of conclusive proof of tax evasion.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Kerala General Sales Tax Act Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

D. Nageswar Rao v. S.B.I & Ors.

29 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the defaulting borrower a final opportunity to repay outstanding bank dues in installments under strict conditions, balancing interests of the bank and auction purchaser.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 loan default installment payment auction purchaser

Dharam Pal v. State of Haryana

29 Jan 2016 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court allowed transfer of investigation to the CBI despite trial commencement, emphasizing the constitutional duty to ensure fair and impartial investigation in exceptional cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant transfer of investigation CBI investigation fair trial judicial review

Union of India v. Saleena

29 Jan 2016 · Dipak Misra; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld a COFEPOSA detention order, ruling that effective communication of rejection of representation by a subordinate officer suffices and non-communication by the competent authority does not invalidate detention if subjective satisfaction is evident.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention COFEPOSA Act Article 22(5) Constitution of India subjective satisfaction

Mohan Lal v. Mohan Lal & Ors

29 Jan 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court clarified that limitation for redemption of usufructuary mortgage starts from the date the mortgage money is paid, set aside the High Court's orders, and remanded the suit for trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant usufructuary mortgage limitation redemption Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC

M/s. Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & Anr

29 Jan 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Arun Mishra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that statutory concessional electricity tariffs are privileges subject to withdrawal by the State and promissory estoppel cannot prevent such withdrawal once statutory conditions are met.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant promissory estoppel concessional tariff statutory concession electricity tariff

Senior Divisional Commercial Manager v. S.C.R. Caterers, Dry Fruits, Fruit Juice Stalls Welfare Association

29 Jan 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of existing railway catering licensees to renewal under the 2010 Catering Policy, affirming their constitutional right to livelihood and striking down arbitrary denial of renewal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Catering Policy 2010 license renewal right to livelihood Article 21

Union of India v. Mohanlal & Anr.

28 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court clarified and mandated strict compliance with statutory procedures under Section 52A of the NDPS Act for seizure, sampling, storage, and disposal of narcotic drugs, directing establishment of adequate storage facilities and judicial supervision to prevent pilferage and ensure timely destruction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A seizure of narcotics sampling procedure

Sachchidanand Gupta v. State of U.P.

28 Jan 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court recalled its earlier appointment of Justice Virendra Singh as Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta due to misrepresentation and lack of consensus, appointing Justice Sanjay Misra instead.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Lokayukta appointment Article 142 Constitution Chief Justice opinion consultative process

Kasthuri Radhakrishnan v. M. Chinniyan

28 Jan 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that eviction petitions under Rent Control laws are maintainable without joining all co-owners and tenancy created by a power of attorney holder binds the principal, restoring eviction of tenant on grounds of default and bona fide need.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction petition co-owners power of attorney landlord-tenant relationship

Union of India v. Mohanlal & Anr.

28 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court clarified statutory procedures under the NDPS Act for seizure, sampling, storage, and disposal of narcotics, mandated adequate storage facilities and judicial supervision, and directed prompt disposal to prevent pilferage and recirculation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A seizure of narcotics sampling procedure

Bharat Aluminium Company v. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc.

28 Jan 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Kurian Joseph; Amitava Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where parties choose foreign law and seat for arbitration, Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act is excluded, and Indian courts lack jurisdiction to set aside foreign arbitral awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Part I exclusion foreign law governing arbitration seat of arbitration

Don Ayengia v. The State of Assam

28 Jan 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that cheques issued as security for an acknowledged debt can be presented for payment and dishonour thereof attracts liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque promissory note acknowledgement of debt

Vipinchandra Vadilal Bavishi v. State of Gujarat

28 Jan 2016 · M.Y. Eqbal; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that the State failed to lawfully acquire possession of certain land plots under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, entitling appellants to retain possession post the 1999 Repeal Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Urban Land Ceiling Act possession corrigendum statutory notification