Supreme Court of India
16,355 judgments
Shaji K. Joseph v. V. Viswanath
The Supreme Court held that courts should not interfere with ongoing election processes and that election disputes must be referred to the Central Government under the Dentists Act, setting aside the High Court's order allowing such interference.
Shaji K. Joseph v. V. Viswanath
The Supreme Court held that courts should not interfere with the election process once commenced and election disputes under the Dentists Act must be referred to the Central Government, setting aside the High Court's order allowing a candidate's nomination after election commencement.
Satyendra Singh v. Saroj Rani
The Supreme Court directed the High Court to dispose of the appellant's review application within one month and stay contempt proceedings pending its disposal, emphasizing fairness and expeditious adjudication.
Sayyed Ratanbhai Sayeed (D) Th. Lrs. & Ors. v. Shirdi Nagar Panchayat & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that a compromise decree protecting shopkeepers' possession became inexecutable due to subsequent development plans and statutory regulations, affirming the municipal authority's power to remove unauthorized structures in public interest while upholding compensation rights.
Shaji K. Joseph v. V. Viswanath
The Supreme Court held that courts should not interfere with election processes once commenced and that election disputes under the Dentists Act must be referred to the Central Government, setting aside the High Court's order allowing a candidate's nomination after election commencement.
SUBHASH v. GURU TEG BAHADUR HOSPITAL GOVT.OF NCT DELHI
The Supreme Court directed the respondent Hospital to give preference to appellants in future Class-IV vacancies, ignoring age bar, without deciding their direct employment status.
Kathuria Public Schools & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition by the Delhi Development Authority, dismissed the appellants' challenge, and directed possession and management of the acquired land and school premises to be handed over to the government.
Surinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the fixation of land value at Rs. 250 per square yard as consistent with earlier High Court and Supreme Court decisions.
A.K. Saxena v. State Bank of Patiala
The Supreme Court modified the dismissal of an employee involved in alleged fraud by treating him as retired with pension benefits, emphasizing non-discrimination and fairness in disciplinary proceedings.
M/S JAGRAON EXPORTS v. C.I.T-I LUDHIANA
The Supreme Court held that proceeds from the sale of scrap are not includible in total turnover for claiming deductions under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Ashok Kumar & Anr. v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court held that under the amended Land Acquisition Act, courts must award just and fair compensation based on true market value, not limited by the owner's claim, and fixed the appellants' land value at Rs. 200 per square yard considering its location.
Chidambaram v. Spl. Tahsildar Land Acquisition & Ors
The Supreme Court held that land acquired under notification dated 22.05.1991 is entitled to compensation at Rs. 20 per square foot with statutory benefits, aligning with its earlier ruling in Valliyammal's case.
Om Parkash & Ors. v. State of Haryana
The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' appeal and directed compensation for acquired land at Rs. 250 per sq. yard, aligning it with precedent valuations for adjoining lands.
Roshan Lal v. State of Punjab & Ors.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's summary dismissal of a review petition concerning land acquisition and directed it to consider the appellant's substantive grounds and pass a speaking order.
Rajendra Kumar Tekriwal v. M/S Unique Constrn. P. Ltd. & Ors.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, vacated the interim order, and directed the Arbitrator to decide all disputes including party joinder and valuation issues expeditiously.
DHARAMVIR v. STATE OF HARYANA
The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and directed payment of enhanced land acquisition compensation at Rs. 90,000 per acre with statutory benefits, following its earlier precedent.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. M/S. Al Faheem Meetex Private Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld the authority of the Bid Evaluation Committee to rescind its earlier recommendation and annul the tender process due to procedural irregularities before final approval by the Competent Authority.
INDIAN BANK v. M/S NIPPON ENTERPRISES SOUTH
The Supreme Court held that a bank successful in SARFAESI proceedings against an owner cannot evict a tenant without following due process under the Rent Control Act.
Shobha Singh v. National Thermal Power Corp. & Anr.
The Supreme Court directed fixation of land compensation at Rs. 480 per decimal with statutory benefits, allowing higher rates if similarly settled with others, ensuring fairness in land acquisition valuation.
Ratti Ram v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that statutory interest on enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be paid for the entire period from dispossession, including periods of stay in proceedings caused by the claimant.