Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Jaidev Inder Singh v. Amritsar Improvement Trust

16 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that land allotment rights under the Punjab Town Improvement Trust Rules apply separately to each acquisition, allowing the appellant and family to claim 250 sq. yards each despite prior allotment and exemption.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition local displaced person Punjab Town Improvement Trust Act, 1922 land allotment rules

Punjab & Sind Bank v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal

16 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the bank to file a review petition before the High Court to challenge the deletion of a guarantor based on an alleged substitution guarantee, disposing of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural guarantee substitution of guarantor debt recovery tribunal review application

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR & ORS v. SOCIETY FOR THE PROMN.OF EDN., ALLAHABAD

16 Feb 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court held that an application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act is deemed registered if the tax authorities do not respond within six months, with effect from the expiry of that six-month period.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 12AA Income Tax Act, 1961 deemed registration tax exemption

Mahendra Bhimrao Kharat v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority

16 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed timely execution and registration of allotment agreements, assured minimum carpet area allotment, and mandated formation of the Cooperative Society in a housing redevelopment dispute, disposing of the appeals with no costs.

civil appeal_dismissed housing redevelopment allotment agreement carpet area Cooperative Society

Rajender Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

16 Feb 2016 · Shiva Kirti Singh; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court remanded a land allotment dispute under the East Punjab Holdings Act for fresh hearing due to denial of opportunity of hearing and clarified the limited scope of Section 43A jurisdiction.

property appeal_allowed Significant East Punjab Holdings Act 1948 Section 43A consolidation proceedings opportunity of hearing

NANDRAM v. M/S GARWARE POLYSTER LTD

16 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that both the Labour Court at the place of employment and the Labour Court at the place where the management decision to terminate is taken have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain termination complaints.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Labour Court jurisdiction termination of service transfer of employee closure of establishment

Pradeep Kumar v. State of U.P and Anr

16 Feb 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court remanded the land acquisition compensation cases for reconsideration due to unexplained disparity in awarded amounts and directed prompt payment of compensation.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation land valuation location factor

Prem Narain v. M/S Swadeshi Cotton Mills, Juhi & Anr.

15 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a Labour Court's reinstatement award cannot be set aside due to superannuation if not challenged, and directed payment of 50% backwages till superannuation with all consequential benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant termination reinstatement backwages superannuation

State of Karnataka v. Dattaraj & Ors.

15 Feb 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; S. A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of certain accused in a dowry death case, emphasizing the need for proximate cruelty linked to death and distinguishing customary gifts from dowry demands.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

AIR CUSTOMS OFFICER IGI NEW DELHI v. PRAMOD KUMAR DHAMIJA

15 Feb 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that exoneration in customs adjudication proceedings does not bar criminal prosecution unless conclusively established on merits, and quashing of criminal complaint on such basis was improper.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant adjudication proceedings criminal prosecution quashing of complaint Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Kanta Tejus Manu v. Tejas Kanubhai Maun

15 Feb 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed maintenance of status quo and expeditious disposal of a family court appeal concerning possession of a disputed flat, dismissing the civil appeal with no order as to costs.

family appeal_dismissed Procedural status quo family court appeal possession property dispute

Union of India v. Lt. Col. Faran Sidiqui

15 Feb 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that additional Colonel vacancies created post-Kargil were meant only for Arms and Arms Support streams, rejected the claim of Services officers to a pro-rata share, and directed creation of additional posts to remedy allocation errors without recognizing a single cadre or legitimate expectation of batch parity across streams.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant AV Singh Committee Command Exit Model Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 promotion vacancies

CHANDRAKANT ADINATH UTTURE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

15 Feb 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court held that any change in the slab reducing exempted land under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act requires fresh public notice and hearing under Section 13(2) before notification.

property appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 Section 13(2) notice land acquisition benefitted zone

Vice Chairman & Managing Director, A.P. State Essential Commodities Corporation Ltd. v. C.V. Viswanatham

12 Feb 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by directing a final payment to the respondent upon superannuation and quashed related contempt proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed superannuation full and final settlement payment of dues contempt proceedings

U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Km. Mamta

12 Feb 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that a first appellate court under the Motor Vehicles Act must give reasoned findings on all issues and remanded the case for fresh disposal due to the High Court's cryptic dismissal of the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173 M.V. Act First appeal Appellate court duty

Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd v. M/s. Prathyusha Resources & Infra Private Limited

12 Feb 2016 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for an escalation claim in a work contract begins when the dispute arises, not on contract completion, and upheld the arbitration award as not time-barred.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration limitation cause of action escalation clause

SURESH KUMAR JUNEJA v. RAJ KUMAR

12 Feb 2016 · ANIL R. DAVE; ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's civil appeal permitting the original defendant to file a written statement belatedly and directed costs to be paid to the respondent.

civil appeal_allowed written statement extension of time costs withdrawal of costs

Alagaapuram R. Mohanraj & Others v. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly

12 Feb 2016 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court set aside the suspension of six Tamil Nadu MLAs for breach of privilege due to violation of natural justice, holding that failure to provide material evidence to the accused members invalidated the Assembly's resolution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 32 Legislative Assembly suspension Breach of privilege Natural justice

State of Maharashtra v. Syed Umar Sayed Abbas

12 Feb 2016 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable eyewitness identification and delayed, flawed Test Identification Parades, emphasizing the necessity of prompt and credible identification to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony test identification parade identity of accused benefit of doubt

State of Jharkhand v. Tata Steel Ltd.

12 Feb 2016 · Dipak Misra; N. V. Ramana
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that deferred tax repayment must be completed within 13 years from the start of deferment eligibility, not from the date of deferment application, and imposed reasonable interest while denying penalty under the Jharkhand VAT Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant deferment of tax sales tax exemption industrial policy Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005