Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

Hardei v. State of U.P.

30 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon an accused not named in the FIR or charge-sheet based on prima facie evidence recorded during trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning of accused FIR charge-sheet

Raghavendra Swamy Mutt v. Uttaradi Mutt

30 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot grant interim relief in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC without admitting the appeal and formulating a substantial question of law, and upheld the vacation of an interim stay granted without such compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 100 CPC Second appeal Substantial question of law Interim order

State of Punjab & Anr. v. Brijeshwar Singh Chahal & Anr.; Pardeep Kumar Rapria v. State of Haryana and Ors.

30 Mar 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that appointments of law officers by State Governments must be made through a fair, transparent, and merit-based process consistent with Article 14, and arbitrary appointments are liable to be quashed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Appointment of law officers Article 14 Arbitrariness Judicial review

Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore v. M/s Grasim Industries Ltd

30 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Arun Mishra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court referred conflicting questions on the interpretation of Sections 3 and 4 of the Central Excise Act and the concept of transaction value to a Larger Bench without deciding the appeals.

tax other Procedural Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 3 Section 4 transaction value

Purple India Holdings Ltd. v. Drilling & Offshore Pte. Ltd.

30 Mar 2016 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon the failure of one party to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration clause

PUNJAB & SIND BANK v. PUNJAB BREEDERS LTD.

29 Mar 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court held that the bank is not entitled to share in the increase of fair market value where no actual sale occurred within the OTS lock-in period, dismissing the bank's appeal and directing release of the mortgaged property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant One Time Settlement fair market value mortgaged property alienation restriction

Jabal C. Lashkari v. Official Liquidator

29 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that the official liquidator in winding-up proceedings has the right to possession of leased land despite alleged rent default and unauthorized assignment claims, affirming the lessee's rights under the lease and Bombay Rent Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Bombay Rent Act, 1947 lease deed official liquidator winding up

M/S SHEIKH NANHEY & SONS v. UNION OF INDIA

29 Mar 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court directed the Railways to renew the appellants' licence in accordance with its earlier judgment, emphasizing lawful, timely, and non-arbitrary administrative action.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant licence renewal Railways administrative law fairness

Gyaneshwar Shyamal v. State of West Bengal

29 Mar 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for rioting, voluntarily causing hurt, and wrongful confinement where the prosecution proved presence, participation, and common object of accused despite absence of the victim's body.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant common object Section 149 IPC rioting abduction

C.I.T.-4, Mumbai v. M/s Kotak Securities Ltd.

29 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that transaction charges paid to the Bombay Stock Exchange are payments for facilities and not fees for technical services, thus no TDS under Section 194J is deductible on such charges.

tax appeal_allowed Significant transaction charges fees for technical services Section 194J Section 40(a)(ia)

Goa Foundation v. State of Goa

29 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Goa Amendment Act, 2009, which retrospectively deleted a statutory prohibition on construction in a land acquisition agreement, removing the basis of an earlier judgment and validating the constructions made.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 41 agreement Goa Amendment Act, 2009 Retrospective legislation

M/s. CASIO India Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana

29 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that exemption from Central Sales Tax under the Haryana notification applies to inter-state sales of goods manufactured by dealers holding valid exemption certificates and extends to subsequent sales by other dealers, overruling the restrictive interpretation of the High Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Section 8(5) Haryana General Sales Tax Rules, 1975 Rule 28A

D. Sudhakar v. State of A.P.

28 Mar 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; S. A. Bobde
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court granted leave and tagged the petitioner’s challenge on reservation for persons with disabilities in IAS selection with related appeals for a comprehensive decision, without deciding the substantive entitlement.

administrative appeal_allowed Procedural reservation persons with disabilities Indian Administrative Service Appointment by Selection Regulations

Sahyadri Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra

28 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that secured creditors with valid pledge rights have precedence over statutory dues under the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, and allowed their appeal against the High Court's dismissal on alternative remedy grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pledge secured creditor right of precedence Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966

Pareshbhai Annabhai Sonvane v. State of Gujarat & Ors.

18 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery under Section 395 IPC but reduced the sentence to the period already served, finding the High Court's enhanced sentence excessive.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 395 IPC robbery sentence enhancement sentence reduction

M/s. Moser Baer Photo Voltaic Ltd. v. M/s. Photon Energy Systems Ltd.

18 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal on the basis of a settlement between parties regarding cheque dishonour liability, leaving open the legal question of prosecution sustainability when the cheque amount differs from the demand notice amount.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Cheque dishonour Demand notice

State of Karnataka v. Common Cause

18 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court extended the exception permitting publication of photographs of the President, Prime Minister, and Chief Justice to Governors and Chief Ministers, allowing publication of Departmental Ministers' photographs in lieu of the Prime Minister's, while upholding other directions of its 2015 judgment.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant photograph publication constitutional authorities President Prime Minister

Pritam Kaur & Ors. v. State of Haryana

18 Mar 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that appellants are entitled to statutory benefits on the fixed land valuation of Rs.1,72,000 per acre, allowing the appeal in part.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land valuation statutory benefits land acquisition compensation

Paul Kuriakose v. The Excise Inspector & Anr.

18 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act but reduced the sentence from three to two years' rigorous imprisonment considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_dismissed Abkari Act Section 55(a) illicit spirit conviction

Main Secretariat, Shillong v. High Court of Meghalaya

18 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot suo motu stay statutory provisions without a formal constitutional challenge and directed the Meghalaya State Human Rights Commission to become functional by June 2016.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant suo motu proceedings judicial review constitutional validity Lokayukta Act