Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

Messer Holdings Ltd. v. Shyam Madanmohan Ruia & Others

19 Apr 2016 · Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging share ownership disputes, holding that prolonged litigation without cause of action is an abuse of process and ordering exemplary costs.

civil petition_dismissed Significant share purchase agreement non-competition clause right of first refusal abuse of judicial process

Chaman and Another v. State of Uttrakhand

19 Apr 2016 · Amitava Roy; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for abduction and murder based on prompt FIR, consistent eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and the presumption of guilt under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act due to their failure to explain the deceased's fate.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abduction murder Section 302 IPC Section 364 IPC

Essar Steel Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Union of India's executive policy to pool RLNG prices, ruling it valid under constitutional powers and dismissing challenges to contract price revisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant RLNG price pooling executive policy judicial review contractual sanctity

M/S SHILPA SHARES AND SECURITIES v. THE NATIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD

19 Apr 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed the High Court to reconsider the appellants' writ petition on merits after disposal of related writ petitions concerning the auction set aside under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant One-Time Settlement auction set aside Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Section 154

Ramo Bai v. State of Haryana

19 Apr 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; R. BANUMATHI

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition to Rs. 325 per square yard for similarly situated appellants but denied statutory benefits for the period of delay in filing appeals.

property appeal_partly_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement statutory benefits delay in filing

Rajesh Verma v. Ashwani Kumar Khanna

19 Apr 2016 · J. Chelameswar; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to appointing an arbitrator without deciding merits, and appointed a retired judge as arbitrator after modifying the High Court order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator jurisdiction of court

Parshotam Lal & Anr v. State of Punjab & Ors

18 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appellants' civil appeals and directed reduction of forfeiture percentage to 2% in their cases, emphasizing discretion based on factual circumstances without establishing a uniform standard.

civil appeal_allowed forfeiture discretion revisional authority appellate authority

M.K. Utthan Sudhar Samiti Maryadit v. Babulalshukla

18 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's intervention in a pending civil revision petition, emphasizing the right to be heard and procedural fairness.

civil appeal_allowed intervention application right to be heard procedural fairness civil revision petition

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S JSC Centrodorstroy

18 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award allowing reimbursement of increased service tax on mandatory insurance and bank guarantees under Clause 70.8 of the contract, dismissing NHAI's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Clause 70.8 COPA service tax reimbursement contract price adjustment arbitral award

Mihir Ranjan Parida v. Menja Naik

18 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to expunge unwarranted adverse observations made by the High Court against the presiding Judge, emphasizing that a wrong order does not justify personal adverse remarks.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse observations expunction judicial conduct presiding Judge

KUNAPAREDDY @ NOOKALA SHANKA BALAJI v. KUNAPAREDDY SWARNA KUMARI

18 Apr 2016 · A.K. Sikri; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that courts have inherent power to allow amendments to petitions under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, even though governed by the CrPC, to serve justice and avoid multiplicity of litigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Domestic Violence Act, 2005 amendment of petition Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 civil reliefs

Medical Council of India v. V.N. Public Health & Educational Trust

18 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that a conditional Essentiality Certificate does not satisfy the mandatory criteria for establishing a new medical college and upheld strict adherence to prescribed application timelines, setting aside the High Court's directions to consider a belated application.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Essentiality Certificate Medical Council of India Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 Section 10-A Indian Medical Council Act

Raj Kumar v. Director of Education & Ors.

13 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that retrenchment of a school driver without complying with mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and prior approval under the Delhi School Education Act is illegal, ordering reinstatement with back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Delhi School Education Act, 1973 retrenchment workman

Sheikh Sintha Madhar v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

13 Apr 2016 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of six accused for conspiracy and murder while acquitting one accused due to lack of evidence linking him to the conspiracy or crime.

criminal appeal_allowed (for A[7]), appeal_dismissed (for A[1] to A[6]) Significant conspiracy murder eyewitness testimony test identification parade

T. Kocha v. State of Kerala

13 Apr 2016 · A. K. Sikri; R. K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that persons appointed under Scheduled Caste reservation as Thandans before the 2007 amendment cannot be retrospectively deprived of their status, affirming the binding nature of the Presidential Scheduled Castes Order.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste Thandan Community Ezhava/Thiyya Community Reservation

EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

13 Apr 2016 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the appellant was not entitled to entry tax exemption under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act due to failure to fulfill mandatory conditions in exemption notifications and upheld the levy of entry tax and penalties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant entry tax exemption notification strict interpretation investment condition

Pallav Sheth v. Canara Bank

13 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld criminal misappropriation conviction under Section 409 IPC but modified sentence and interest rate upon a settlement between the appellant and the bank.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 409 IPC dishonest misappropriation post-dated cheque dishonor criminal liability

Rishabh Chand Jain v. Ginesh Chandra Jain

13 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

An order dismissing a suit on Res Judicata grounds without framing issues is a decree appealable under Section 96 CPC, and procedural irregularity in non-framing does not bar appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Res Judicata cause of action decree appealability

G.S.KAMALAN v. LATHIKA KARTHIKEYAN

13 Apr 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court disposed of long-pending partition appeals by enforcing a mediated settlement between the parties, underscoring the efficacy of alternative dispute resolution.

civil appeal_allowed partition suit mediation amicable settlement Memorandum of Settlement

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S ANANT RAJ AGENCIES PVT. LTD.

12 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that mere acceptance of rent after lease expiry does not renew the lease, and unauthorized occupation of public premises can be terminated by the authority, setting aside prior judgments favoring the lessee and purchaser.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease renewal efflux of time unauthorized occupation Public Premises Act