Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

M/S UNIVERSAL GLASS v. HARPAL SINGH

05 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed a one-time payment of Rs. 7 Lakhs as full and final settlement in a prolonged employment termination dispute where the employer company had closed down, disposing of the appeal without setting precedent.

labor appeal_allowed termination dispute employment termination labor court settlement

Mamta Goyal v. Ramgopal

04 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court disposed of the matrimonial appeal as compromised, dismissed related criminal petitions, and quashed the FIR following an amicable settlement between the parties.

family appeal_allowed matrimonial dispute dissolution of marriage compromise maintenance claim

State of West Bengal v. Calcutta Club Limited

04 May 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question whether the doctrine of mutuality survives post-46th constitutional amendment for sales tax liability of clubs supplying food and drinks to members.

tax other Significant doctrine of mutuality sales tax 46th amendment Article 366(29A)

State of Rajasthan v. Mohinuddin Jamal Alvi

04 May 2016 · A.K. Sikri; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that prior approval under Section 20A(1) of the TADA Act must be given exclusively by the District Superintendent of Police, and approval by any other authority invalidates the prosecution, leading to acquittal of the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant TADA Act Section 20A prior approval District Superintendent of Police

Hemant Madhusudan Nerurkar v. State of Jharkhand

04 May 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld strict and vicarious liability of factory occupier and manager under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948 for statutory violations, imposing penalty despite rectification of defects.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Factories Act 1948 Section 92 strict liability vicarious liability

J. Ramesh Kamath v. Mohana Kurup

04 May 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings for misappropriation by office bearers of an Association, holding that serious offences affecting public interest cannot be quashed merely on settlement under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal proceedings non-compoundable offences misappropriation

AMBA BAI v. GURUSHANTHAMMA

03 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court disposed of a partition dispute appeal by recording and incorporating the parties' amicable settlement into the decree.

civil appeal_allowed amicable settlement partition dispute Memorandum of Compromise civil appeal

Sooraj Kumar v. Tahsildar & Anr.

03 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to recall the auction sale of property and restore it to the appellant upon payment of dues under the Amnesty Scheme.

civil appeal_allowed auction sale recovery proceedings Amnesty Scheme property restoration

M/S RAVI PRAKASH REFINERIES (P) LTD. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

03 May 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that oil cake and de-oiled cake are distinct commodities for CST purposes and that reopening assessment on change of opinion is impermissible, allowing the appellant the benefit of the initial reduced tax rate.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 Section 12-A reopening of assessment

Thota Venkateswara Rao v. State Election Commission

03 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that High Courts must decide legal questions in election disqualification cases themselves rather than remitting them, and remitted the matter back for expeditious disposal on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disqualification Andhra Pradesh Municipal Rules, 2005 Rule 6(8)(i) election dispute

Delhi Development Authority v. Poonam Bhatia

03 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, holding that land acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-possession and non-payment of compensation.

property appeal_dismissed land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT CENTRAL v. SAURASTHRA CEMENT & CHEM. INDUSTRIES LTD

02 May 2016 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the period during which a draft assessment order is with the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner is excluded from the limitation period under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act only if the IAC exercises the powers of the Income Tax Officer under concurrent jurisdiction.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153 limitation Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Officer

Patel Ravjibhai Bhulabhai v. Rahemanbhai M. Shaikh

02 May 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree holding that a deed titled as conditional sale with a repayment condition constituted a mortgage by conditional sale, entitling the plaintiffs to redeem the property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mortgage by conditional sale sale with option to repurchase right of redemption Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Arun Baban Sawant v. Surekha Keru Pimparkar

02 May 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court recorded an amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, directing alimony payments, granting supervised visitation rights, and dismissing all pending litigation between the parties.

family appeal_allowed amicable settlement alimony maintenance visitation rights

Modern Dental College and Research Centre v. State of Madhya Pradesh

02 May 2016 · A.K. Sikri; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court upheld the State's power to regulate admissions and fees in private unaided professional educational institutions as reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6), affirming the constitutional validity of the Madhya Pradesh Act, 2007 and related Rules.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 19(1)(g) private unaided educational institutions Common Entrance Test fee fixation

Sooraj Kumar v. Tahsildar & Anr.

29 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed recall of auction proceedings and restoration of property if the appellant pays dues under the Amnesty Scheme, disposing of the appeal with directions for timely action.

civil appeal_dismissed auction sale recovery proceedings Amnesty Scheme property restoration

Raijibhai Bhikhbhai Parmar and Ors v. Reliance Industries Ltd.

29 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court modified the High Court's direction by allowing employees to deposit 50% of their VRS amount as a pre-condition for Labour Court adjudication, ensuring a balanced and expeditious resolution.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Voluntary Retirement Scheme Labour Court deposit as pre-condition cessation of employment

Mohammad Sadique v. Darbara Singh Guru

29 Apr 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that a person born in a Scheduled Caste community who embraces Sikhism and is accepted as a Sikh retains Scheduled Caste status and is qualified to contest from a reserved constituency.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste Representation of the People Act, 1951 Sikh Gurdwaras Act, 1925 Conversion

Delhi Development Authority v. Reena Suri

28 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession or compensation is not completed within five years prior to the 2013 Act's commencement, and that passing an award alone does not vest land in the government.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013 Section 24 Section 11 award

Verhoeven, Marie-Emmanuelle v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Apr 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; N. V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that the 1897 extradition treaty between the UK and Chile is binding on India, the Extradition Act applies to Chile only after valid notification, and extradition proceedings must comply with statutory procedural requirements protecting individual liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extradition treaty Extradition Act 1962 Section 2(d) provisional arrest