Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

M.K. Utthan Sudhar Samiti Maryadit v. Babulalshukla

18 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's intervention in a pending civil revision petition, emphasizing the right to be heard and procedural fairness.

civil appeal_allowed intervention application right to be heard procedural fairness civil revision petition

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S JSC Centrodorstroy

18 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Uday Umesh Lalit
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award allowing reimbursement of increased service tax on mandatory insurance and bank guarantees under Clause 70.8 of the contract, dismissing NHAI's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Clause 70.8 COPA service tax reimbursement contract price adjustment arbitral award

Mihir Ranjan Parida v. Menja Naik

18 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to expunge unwarranted adverse observations made by the High Court against the presiding Judge, emphasizing that a wrong order does not justify personal adverse remarks.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adverse observations expunction judicial conduct presiding Judge

KUNAPAREDDY @ NOOKALA SHANKA BALAJI v. KUNAPAREDDY SWARNA KUMARI

18 Apr 2016 · A.K. Sikri; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that courts have inherent power to allow amendments to petitions under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, even though governed by the CrPC, to serve justice and avoid multiplicity of litigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Domestic Violence Act, 2005 amendment of petition Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 civil reliefs

Medical Council of India v. V.N. Public Health & Educational Trust

18 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that a conditional Essentiality Certificate does not satisfy the mandatory criteria for establishing a new medical college and upheld strict adherence to prescribed application timelines, setting aside the High Court's directions to consider a belated application.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Essentiality Certificate Medical Council of India Establishment of Medical College Regulations, 1999 Section 10-A Indian Medical Council Act

Raj Kumar v. Director of Education & Ors.

13 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that retrenchment of a school driver without complying with mandatory provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and prior approval under the Delhi School Education Act is illegal, ordering reinstatement with back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Delhi School Education Act, 1973 retrenchment workman

Sheikh Sintha Madhar v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

13 Apr 2016 · Pinaki Chandra Ghose; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of six accused for conspiracy and murder while acquitting one accused due to lack of evidence linking him to the conspiracy or crime.

criminal appeal_allowed (for A[7]), appeal_dismissed (for A[1] to A[6]) Significant conspiracy murder eyewitness testimony test identification parade

T. Kocha v. State of Kerala

13 Apr 2016 · A. K. Sikri; R. K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that persons appointed under Scheduled Caste reservation as Thandans before the 2007 amendment cannot be retrospectively deprived of their status, affirming the binding nature of the Presidential Scheduled Castes Order.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Caste Thandan Community Ezhava/Thiyya Community Reservation

EVEREADY INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

13 Apr 2016 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the appellant was not entitled to entry tax exemption under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act due to failure to fulfill mandatory conditions in exemption notifications and upheld the levy of entry tax and penalties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant entry tax exemption notification strict interpretation investment condition

Pallav Sheth v. Canara Bank

13 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld criminal misappropriation conviction under Section 409 IPC but modified sentence and interest rate upon a settlement between the appellant and the bank.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 409 IPC dishonest misappropriation post-dated cheque dishonor criminal liability

Rishabh Chand Jain v. Ginesh Chandra Jain

13 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

An order dismissing a suit on Res Judicata grounds without framing issues is a decree appealable under Section 96 CPC, and procedural irregularity in non-framing does not bar appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Res Judicata cause of action decree appealability

G.S.KAMALAN v. LATHIKA KARTHIKEYAN

13 Apr 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court disposed of long-pending partition appeals by enforcing a mediated settlement between the parties, underscoring the efficacy of alternative dispute resolution.

civil appeal_allowed partition suit mediation amicable settlement Memorandum of Settlement

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S ANANT RAJ AGENCIES PVT. LTD.

12 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that mere acceptance of rent after lease expiry does not renew the lease, and unauthorized occupation of public premises can be terminated by the authority, setting aside prior judgments favoring the lessee and purchaser.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease renewal efflux of time unauthorized occupation Public Premises Act

B. Gope v. Aldor Welding Ltd

12 Apr 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal by directing a payment of Rs. 2 lakhs as full and final settlement of the employment dispute, modifying the impugned judgment accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed civil appeal employment dispute monetary settlement full and final settlement

Pragati Builders & Promoters v. M/s Ram Murty Pyara Lal

12 Apr 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court enhanced the interest rate payable to appellants from 6% to 15% per annum on the amount paid for property purchase, directing the bank and borrower to adjust payments accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interest rate simple interest auction price respondent bank

Kusum Harilal Soni v. Chandrika Nandlal Mehta

12 Apr 2016 · Arun Mishra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that sham documents created to defeat a final eviction and compensation order cannot set aside attachment in execution proceedings and allowed the appeal to uphold the attachment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution proceedings attachment eviction compensation

Jayashri Bhaskar Gosavi v. Vishwanath Krishnath Panke

12 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that tribal status must be independently established and directed the competent authority to reconsider the appellant's claim to Scheduled Tribe status after allowing her to produce additional evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe status Hindu Gosavi caste certificate tribal status

V. Sejappa v. The State by Police Inspector Lokayukta, Chitradurga

12 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of a public servant accused of corruption, holding that mere recovery of money without proof of demand and acceptance as bribe is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence demand of bribe illegal gratification

AMANULLAH AND ANR. v. STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

12 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction in quashing the cognizance order under Section 482 CrPC and allowed the appeal filed by private parties having locus standi to proceed with the criminal prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC locus standi cognizance quashing of criminal proceedings

Kedar Mishra v. State of Bihar

12 Apr 2016 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with the prescribed treasury head in deposit challans under Bihar Land Reforms Rules is not fatal to a pre-emption claim if the purchase money plus ten percent is deposited, allowing the appeal and remitting the matter for fresh consideration.

property appeal_allowed Significant right of pre-emption Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1961 Section 16(3) Rule 19