Supreme Court of India

16,355 judgments

Year:

Medical Council of India v. Christian Medical College Vellore

11 Apr 2016 · Anil R. Dave; A.K. Sikri; R.K. Agrawal; Adarsh Kumar Goel; R... · (2014) 2 SCC 305

The Supreme Court allowed review petitions to recall its earlier judgment and directed a fresh hearing, clarifying the limited scope of review and the non-requirement of detailed reasons at the review stage.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant review petition scope of review errors apparent on the face of record re-hearing

Pawan Kumar Aggarwal v. State of Punjab

11 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that a landowner not dispossessed despite an acquisition award is entitled to protection under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act and quashed the acquisition proceedings accordingly.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 possession

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION v. UNION OF INDIA

08 Apr 2016 · T.S. THAKUR; A.K. SIKRI; R. BANUMATHI
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the government's policy allowing migration of BWA spectrum holders to Unified License permitting voice telephony on payment of a fixed migration fee, dismissing claims of arbitrariness and undue favor.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Unified License BWA spectrum ISP license Telecom auction

State of Kerala v. M/S Kerala Rare Earth & Minerals Limited

08 Apr 2016 · T.S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that the State Government cannot reserve mining areas for public sector undertakings without following the statutory procedure under Section 17A of the MMDR Act, and upheld the binding nature of the Central Government's revisional order directing reconsideration of mining lease applications.

property appeal_dismissed Significant mining lease mines and minerals MMDR Act 1957 Section 17A

Manish Kumar Sureka v. West Bengal Financial Corporation

07 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal to participate in a court-supervised bidding process after rejecting the High Court's refusal to grant extension for payment, ensuring fairness and maximizing sale price.

civil appeal_allowed Significant judicial sale extension of time bidding process deposit of sale consideration

Standard Chartered Bank v. State of Maharashtra

06 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh · (2015) 8 SCALE 733
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that summons under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be issued against company directors only if the complaint specifically avers their responsibility for the company's business, and quashing such summons requires strong justification.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Dishonour of cheque

Chandrabhan v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

06 Apr 2016 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 2 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of a false Scheduled Tribe claim and mandated withdrawal of benefits obtained thereon under the Maharashtra Act, 2000, affirming strict adherence to the Scheduled Tribes Order.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Scheduled Tribes Order Article 342 Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act 2000 false caste certificate

Narayan v. Babasaheb

05 Apr 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; N.V. Ramana

The Supreme Court held that suits by minors to set aside property transfers by their natural guardian are governed by a three-year limitation under Article 60 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and dismissed the appeal challenging this limitation period.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 60 Article 109 Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956

Commissioner, Delhi Value Added Tax v. M/s. ABB Ltd.

05 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that sales of goods imported and moved inter-state pursuant to a works contract with specified approval and inspection conditions are exempt from state VAT under the Central Sales Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 inter-state trade sale in course of import

Common Cause v. Union of India

04 Apr 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan · (2014) 14 SCC 155

The Supreme Court clarified the legal framework for subsistence and renewal of mining leases under the MMDR Act, upheld the 2015 amendment extending lease periods, and held that lapsing of leases requires formal orders, allowing leaseholders with valid pending renewals to continue mining operations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant mining lease MMDR Act Section 8 Section 8A

Lilawati Agarwal v. State of Jharkhand

01 Apr 2016 · Dipak Misra; V. Gopala Gowda; Kurian Joseph · 2008 15 SCC 464
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that enhanced solatium under the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 applies to awards passed after the amendment and clarified entitlement to interest on the entire compensation amount.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act Section 23(2) Section 30(2) enhanced solatium

LIC of India v. Krishna Murari Lal Asthana

31 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; R. Banumathi
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that pension benefit amendments by LIC Board resolution require Central Government rule-making under Section 48 of the LIC Act and transferred constitutional challenges on dearness relief cut-off dates to the Delhi High Court for adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 pension benefits dearness relief Board resolution

Savelife Foundation & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

30 Mar 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court mandated binding guidelines protecting Good Samaritans who assist road accident victims, filling the legislative vacuum until Parliament enacts specific laws.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Good Samaritan Article 21 Right to life Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Hardei v. State of U.P.

30 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. to summon an accused not named in the FIR or charge-sheet based on prima facie evidence recorded during trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning of accused FIR charge-sheet

Raghavendra Swamy Mutt v. Uttaradi Mutt

30 Mar 2016 · Dipak Misra; Shiva Kirti Singh
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot grant interim relief in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC without admitting the appeal and formulating a substantial question of law, and upheld the vacation of an interim stay granted without such compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 100 CPC Second appeal Substantial question of law Interim order

State of Punjab & Anr. v. Brijeshwar Singh Chahal & Anr.; Pardeep Kumar Rapria v. State of Haryana and Ors.

30 Mar 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that appointments of law officers by State Governments must be made through a fair, transparent, and merit-based process consistent with Article 14, and arbitrary appointments are liable to be quashed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Appointment of law officers Article 14 Arbitrariness Judicial review

Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore v. M/s Grasim Industries Ltd

30 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Arun Mishra; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court referred conflicting questions on the interpretation of Sections 3 and 4 of the Central Excise Act and the concept of transaction value to a Larger Bench without deciding the appeals.

tax other Procedural Central Excise Act, 1944 Section 3 Section 4 transaction value

Purple India Holdings Ltd. v. Drilling & Offshore Pte. Ltd.

30 Mar 2016 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon the failure of one party to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration clause

PUNJAB & SIND BANK v. PUNJAB BREEDERS LTD.

29 Mar 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court held that the bank is not entitled to share in the increase of fair market value where no actual sale occurred within the OTS lock-in period, dismissing the bank's appeal and directing release of the mortgaged property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant One Time Settlement fair market value mortgaged property alienation restriction

Jabal C. Lashkari v. Official Liquidator

29 Mar 2016 · Ranjan Gogoi; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court held that the official liquidator in winding-up proceedings has the right to possession of leased land despite alleged rent default and unauthorized assignment claims, affirming the lessee's rights under the lease and Bombay Rent Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Bombay Rent Act, 1947 lease deed official liquidator winding up