Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

Sankalp Charitable Trust v. Union of India

28 Apr 2016 · Anil R. Dave; Shiva Kirti Singh; Adarsh Kumar Goel

The Supreme Court directed the conduct of NEET for MBBS admissions in 2016-17, upholding the statutory notifications and overriding earlier conflicting orders.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant NEET Writ of Mandamus Medical Council of India Dental Council of India

VLS FINANCE LTD. & ANR v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR

28 Apr 2016 · A.K. Sikri; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the period during which special audit proceedings were stayed must be excluded from the limitation period for block assessments, and the limitation period begins from the conclusion of the last search operation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant block assessment limitation period special audit Section 158BE

M/S. NORTHERN MINERALS LTD. & ORS. v. RAJASTHAN GOVT. & ANR.

28 Apr 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court held that accused under the Insecticides Act have the right to have seized samples re-tested at the Central Insecticides Laboratory, and prosecution must be quashed if the sample expires before such re-testing, frustrating the accused's right to a fair defense.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Insecticides Act 1968 Section 24 Insecticide Analyst's report re-testing sample

Harijan Bhala Teja v. State of Gujarat

27 Apr 2016 · A. K. Sikri; Prafulla C. Pant

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder by strangulation, holding that appellate courts may overturn perverse acquittals based on strong medical and circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant strangulation hyoid bone fracture Section 302 IPC appellate interference

BALRAM YADAV v. FULMANIYA YADAV

27 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that Family Courts have exclusive jurisdiction to entertain suits seeking declarations regarding matrimonial status, including negative declarations, overruling the High Court's contrary view.

family appeal_allowed Significant Family Courts Act, 1984 jurisdiction matrimonial status negative declaration

Ashok Kumar Giri v. Govt. of India

27 Apr 2016 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that reservation for persons with disabilities must be computed on cadre strength and not on notified vacancies, setting aside the High Court order and remanding the case for fresh consideration.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation persons with disabilities Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Section 32

Nikhil Kumar v. Rupali Kumar

27 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court waived the six-month statutory waiting period for divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, invoking Article 142 to dissolve the marriage immediately due to exceptional circumstances.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13-B divorce by mutual consent six-month waiting period

State through CBI/ACB, Hyderabad A.P v. Dharmana Prased Rao

26 Apr 2016 · A.K. Sikri; R.K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that a Trial Court's subsequent taking of cognizance after deferring it is not a barred review under Section 362 CrPC and remanded the issue of sanction under Section 19 of the PC Act for fresh consideration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 362 CrPC Cognizance Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19 sanction

ITC LIMITED GURGAON v. COMMISSIONER OF I.T. (TDS) DELHI

26 Apr 2016 · R. F. Nariman; Kurian Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that tips collected by employers and paid to employees do not constitute salary under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and thus do not attract tax deduction at source liability under Section 192.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 192 Section 201(1) Section 201(1A)

M.K. Indrajeet Sinhji Cotton P. Ltd. v. Narmada Cotto Coop. Spg. Mills Ltd.

26 Apr 2016 · S. A. Bobde; Amitava Roy

The Supreme Court held that the Registrar under Section 112 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act cannot refuse leave to continue a suit on the ground of non-compliance with the mandatory notice under Section 167, as such tenability questions are exclusively for the civil court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 Section 112 Section 167 leave to continue suit

Amal Kumar Jha v. State of Chhatisgarh

26 Apr 2016 · Arun Mishra; V. Gopala Gowda
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that prosecution of a public servant for an offence committed in discharge of official duty requires prior sanction under Section 197(1) Cr.P.C., and quashed the proceedings against the appellant for lack of such sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 Cr.P.C. sanction to prosecute official duty public servant

Philomina K. A. v. District Collector, Alappuzha and Anr.

26 Apr 2016 · A. K. Sikri; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that an unmarried daughter without independent income is entitled to freedom fighter's pension despite having a son living separately, emphasizing actual dependency under the Kerala Freedom Fighters' Pension Rules.

civil appeal_allowed Significant freedom fighter's pension Kerala Freedom Fighters' Pension Rules, 1971 unmarried daughter dependency

Pawan Kumar Pathak v. Mohan Prasad

26 Apr 2016 · A. K. Sikri; R. K. Agrawal

The Supreme Court held that a pleading claiming to be the 'son' includes an adopted son under law, and thus the adoption deed is admissible evidence notwithstanding the absence of specific pleading of adoption.

civil appeal_allowed Significant adopted son inheritance pleadings admissibility of evidence

Suryabhan v. Bhagirathibai

25 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court disposed of a family partition appeal by recording the parties' compromise, incorporating it into the decree and ending the litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed partition dispute family property compromise deed of compromise

State of M.P. v. Rajveer Singh

25 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that an FIR under Section 307 IPC cannot be quashed on the basis of compromise, emphasizing the offence's non-compoundable nature and the need for proper investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC non-compoundable offence quashing of FIR compromise

Devinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab through CBI

25 Apr 2016 · V. Gopala Gowda; Arun Mishra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that prior sanction of the competent authority is mandatory for prosecuting police officers for offences committed while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty under the Punjab Disturbed Areas Act and section 197 CrPC, and such sanction is to be decided by the competent authority, not the court.

criminal other Significant sanction for prosecution section 197 CrPC Punjab Disturbed Areas Act 1983 police officers prosecution

Paramjit Kaur v. Balkar Singh & Anr.

25 Apr 2016 · Arun Mishra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court ordered a fresh hearing on the framing of charges and sanction for prosecution after noting incomplete arguments on merits in a criminal case.

criminal other Procedural framing of charges discharge application sanction for prosecution High Court

Orissa State Housing Board v. Indira English Medium School

25 Apr 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Orissa State Housing Board, setting aside the High Court's land allotment order and directing allotment of an alternate site subject to the school producing affiliation.

civil appeal_allowed land allotment school affiliation alternate site Orissa State Housing Board

AXIS BANK v. SBS ORGANICS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER

22 Apr 2016 · KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

The Supreme Court held that the pre-deposit made under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act as a condition for entertaining an appeal must be refunded upon withdrawal or disposal of the appeal unless lawfully appropriated or attached.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 18 pre-deposit secured creditor

M/S. SHINHAN APEX CORPORATION v. M/S. EURO APEX B.V.

22 Apr 2016 · Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla; S.A. Bobde

The Supreme Court held that the appellant complied with the arbitral award by executing the transfer deed as per the respondent's final draft and set aside the High Court's order directing re-execution on earlier terms.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award enforcement patent transfer partial final award arbitration clause