Supreme Court of India

18,587 judgments

Year:

D.T.C. v. Gian Chand

08 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to vacate the award of back wages while upholding reinstatement with continuity of service and directed a fresh pension option for the respondent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement back wages continuity of service pension benefits

Shaikh Hamid Sk. Hanif v. Salim Baig Yusuf Baig

05 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that the Scrutiny Committee may conduct a fresh caste verification but has no power of review, set aside certain impugned orders, maintained status quo, and directed expeditious disposal of the verification process.

civil appeal_allowed caste verification Scrutiny Committee power of review status quo

Swami Achyutanand Tirth v. Union of India

05 Aug 2016 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court directed the Union and State Governments to strengthen enforcement of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and amend penal provisions to effectively combat the widespread adulteration of milk, safeguarding public health and the fundamental right to life.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant milk adulteration Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Article 21 food safety

GIRISH S/O DHARMAVIR MADAN v. NANDKUMAR S/O SHANKARRAO RASNE

05 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed identification of the appellant's 3/7th share in the property before eviction proceedings could continue, staying eviction until shares are ascertained.

civil appeal_allowed property dispute eviction proceedings identification of shares Court Commissioner

Aditi Wadhera v. Vivek Kumar Wadhera

04 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court granted divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act by waiving the statutory waiting period and quashed pending criminal cases between the parties as part of an amicable settlement under its Article 142 jurisdiction.

family appeal_allowed Significant divorce by mutual consent Section 13B Hindu Marriage Act Article 142 Constitution transfer petition

Archbishop Raphael Cheenath S.V.D. v. State of Orissa & Anr.

02 Aug 2016 · T.S. Thakur; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court directed enhanced compensation and continued relief measures for Kandhamal communal violence victims, upheld State's investigation and policing efforts, and rejected transfer of investigation to CBI.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant communal violence Kandhamal riots police deployment compensation

Electrotherm (India) Ltd. v. Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai & Ors.

02 Aug 2016 · T. S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that public consultation is mandatory for environmental clearance of expansion projects and directed post-decisional public hearing where expansion was undertaken without prior consultation.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Clearance Public Consultation Public Hearing EIA Notification 2006

Educational Consultants India Limited v. Union of India

02 Aug 2016 · T.S. Thakur; R. Banumathi; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful extension of tenure of the CMD of Ed.CIL after due procedure and vigilance clearance, affirming the advisory role of the CVC and rejecting challenges based on unsubstantiated allegations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant extension of tenure Chairman-cum-Managing Director Educational Consultants India Limited Public Sector Undertaking

Lourdes Society Snehanjali Girls Hostel v. M/S H & R Johnson (India) Ltd.

02 Aug 2016 · T.S. Thakur; V. Gopala Gowda; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that a charitable society purchasing goods for non-commercial use is a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act and restored compensation awarded for defective tiles, setting aside the National Commission's order.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant consumer definition charitable institution commercial establishment Consumer Protection Act 1986

Mathews J. Nedumpara v. The Supreme Court of India & Ors.

01 Aug 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:5430-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's collegium system judgment is binding under Article 141 and dismissed the challenge to judicial appointments made under it.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 141 Supreme Court binding precedent collegium system judicial appointments

ARUN BABULAL PARASHAR v. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

01 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that appeals against Single Judge judgments are maintainable before the Division Bench and remitted the matter for expeditious disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appeal maintainability Single Judge judgment Division Bench jurisdiction procedural law

Suzanne Farisha Syiem Dutt v. Sabyasachi Dutt

01 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court directed the trial court to first determine its jurisdiction under Sections 9 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 before proceeding with the custody dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural jurisdiction custody minor child Guardians and Wards Act, 1890

Lok Prahari v. State of U.P. & Ors.

01 Aug 2016 · Anil R. Dave; N. V. Ramana; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that the 1997 Rules allowing former Uttar Pradesh Chief Ministers to occupy government bungalows for life are invalid as they contravene statutory provisions and Article 14, directing recovery of possession and rent from unauthorized occupants.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Ex-Chief Ministers Residence Allotment Rules, 1997 Uttar Pradesh Ministers (Salaries, Allowances and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1981 Article 14 Constitution of India public interest litigation

Madina Begum v. Shiv Murti Prasad Pandey

01 Aug 2016 · Madan B. Lokur; R.K. Agrawal
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that where no specific calendar date is fixed for contract performance, limitation for specific performance begins from refusal notice, and the first appellate court must decide all issues, not just limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 54 Specific performance Date fixed for performance

Bahubali Ravaji Doshi v. State of Maharashtra

01 Aug 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court disposed of the civil appeal by directing partial release of amounts deposited by the State in line with its earlier directions in connected cases, ensuring uniformity and avoiding unnecessary litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed release of deposited amount connected matters security for release civil appeal

High Court of Punjab & Haryana v. Jagdev Singh

29 Jul 2016 · T S Thakur; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that excess salary payments made to a retired judicial officer who had given an undertaking to refund such amounts can be recovered by the State, directing recovery in installments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant excess salary payment government employee undertaking to refund recovery after retirement

Sudhir Chaudhary v. State (NCT of Delhi)

29 Jul 2016 · T.S. Thakur; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that while voice samples are identification data and do not violate the right against self-incrimination, their collection must be conducted fairly under Article 21, balancing investigative needs and accused rights.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant voice sample consent Article 21 Article 20(3)

Ajay Kumar Pandey v. Piyush Verma

29 Jul 2016 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court removed the appellant's imprisonment sentence under the Contempt of Courts Act upon his unconditional apology but suspended his advocate licence for two years and upheld other restrictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Contempt of Courts Act unconditional apology remorse suspension of advocate licence

Bhikulal Kedarmal Goenka v. State of Maharashtra and Anr

28 Jul 2016 · Jagdish Singh Khehar; Kurian Joseph; Arun Mishra

The Supreme Court held that no deduction for development charges is warranted when land acquired for a public purpose is situated in a developed urban area, and fixed compensation at the market value of comparable land without such deductions.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value development charges

ACC LTD. v. STATE OF KERALA

28 Jul 2016 · Dipak Misra; Rohinton Fali Nariman

The Supreme Court held that under Section 5(2) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, the sale by the brand name holder ACC Ltd. is the first sale for tax purposes, dismissing the appellant's claim that the manufacturer Cochin Cement Limited's sale should be treated as such.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 Section 5(2) brand name holder trade mark holder