Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. Chaman Rana

12 Mar 2018 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated claims for retrospective promotion based on non-communication of adverse ACR remarks are barred by delay and laches, setting aside the High Court's order directing retrospective consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion delay and laches retrospective effect annual confidential report

Union of India v. Chaman Rana

12 Mar 2018 · Arun Mishra; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that claims for retrospective promotion based on non-communication of adverse remarks are barred by delay and laches if not pursued within a reasonable time, setting aside the High Court's order granting retrospective promotion after over 17 years.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant promotion delay and laches retrospective promotion annual confidential report

Sudhakar @ Sudharasan v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

12 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 229

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction due to contradictions and lack of credible independent evidence, emphasizing caution in relying on interested witnesses and the necessity of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder interested witness reasonable doubt

Sudhakar @ Sudharasan v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

12 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court overturned a murder conviction due to contradictions in prosecution evidence and reliance on interested witnesses without independent corroboration, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant Section 302 IPC murder interested witness reasonable doubt

Income Tax Officer, Mumbai v. Venkatesh Premises Cooperative Society Ltd.

12 Mar 2018 · Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha · 2018 INSC 232

The Supreme Court held that receipts by premises co-operative societies from members under the doctrine of mutuality are exempt from income tax unless they involve commerciality or exceed statutory limits applicable only to housing societies.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant doctrine of mutuality co-operative societies income tax exemption non-occupancy charges

Income Tax Officer, Mumbai v. Venkatesh Premises Cooperative Society Ltd.

12 Mar 2018 · Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that receipts by co-operative societies from members used for common benefit are exempt from income tax under the doctrine of mutuality, and the Government notification limiting charges applies only to housing societies, not premises societies.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant doctrine of mutuality co-operative societies income tax exemption non-occupancy charges

Dev Kanya Tiwari v. The State of U.P.

12 Mar 2018 · N.V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court overturned a murder conviction due to failure of prosecution to exclude the possibility of suicide and lapses in preserving crucial evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence chain of circumstances Section 302 IPC poisoning

Sivakami v. State of Tamil Nadu

12 Mar 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court set aside unreasoned High Court orders on land acquisition and remanded the writ petition for fresh adjudication with proper reasoning.

civil appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition writ petition reasoned order appellate jurisdiction

Rameshwar & Others v. State of Haryana & Others

12 Mar 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that the State's withdrawal of land acquisition was a mala fide exercise of power benefiting private builders, declared the acquisition deemed completed, and directed restitution to protect public interest and prevent unjust enrichment.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition fraud on power mala fide exercise unjust enrichment

Kerala State Electricity Board and Another v. Kurien E. Kalathil and Another

09 Mar 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that payments must be appropriated as per decree directions, denied subsequent interest claims absent explicit orders, set aside arbitration without written consent, and allowed the appeal of Kerala State Electricity Board against excess payment directions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appropriation of payments subsequent interest labour escalation charges material escalation charges

Kerala State Electricity Board v. Kurien E. Kalathil

09 Mar 2018 · R. Banumathi; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's directions for further payments and interest under labour escalation claims, held that payments must be appropriated as per decree directions, disallowed arbitration without written consent, and allowed the appeal of Kerala State Electricity Board.

civil appeal_allowed Significant appropriation of payments subsequent interest labour escalation charges material escalation charges

Sunil B. Naik v. Geowave Commander

09 Mar 2018 · J. Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that a bareboat charterer’s de facto possession does not confer beneficial ownership to arrest a vessel owned by a third party for maritime claims arising from contracts with the charterer.

maritime_admiralty appeal_dismissed Significant bareboat charter maritime claim admiralty jurisdiction arrest of ship

Common Cause v. Union of India

09 Mar 2018 · Dipak Misra; A. M. Khanwilkar; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that while the right to die is not a fundamental right under Article 21, passive euthanasia may be permitted under strict judicial and medical safeguards until legislation is enacted.

constitutional other Significant right to die with dignity Article 21 passive euthanasia living will

Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

08 Mar 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 221

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored the review petition by condoning the delay, emphasizing that procedural laws should be interpreted liberally to further justice rather than to punish parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant procedural law condonation of delay review petition registry objections

Pralhad Shankarrao Tajale & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra

08 Mar 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored the review petition by condoning delay, emphasizing liberal construction of procedural laws to ensure justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant procedural law condonation of delay review petition restoration of application

Abdulraskh v. K.P. Mohammed & Ors.

08 Mar 2018 · Chelameswar; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court's decision that an election petition presented within time with minor curable defects is maintainable and dismissed the appellant's plea of time bar and procedural irregularities.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant election petition Representation of People Act, 1951 limitation period curing defects

Ummer v. Pottengal Subida

08 Mar 2018 · R. K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court allowed condonation of a 554-day delay in filing a family court appeal due to appellant's prolonged illness and old age, directing the High Court to decide the appeal on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act ex parte decree family court

Kachiya Patel v. Divisional Controller GSRTC

07 Mar 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre · 2018 INSC 218

The Supreme Court upheld the binding nature of a settlement clause prescribing absorption of daily wagers into permanent cadre only upon vacancy and completion of 180 days, dismissing employees' claims for earlier benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Badali Kamdar Industrial Disputes Act Section 18 settlement absorption in permanent cadre

Bhupendra Kumar Chimanbhai Kachiya Patel v. Divisional Controller GSRTC

07 Mar 2018 · R.K. Agrawal; Abhay Manohar Sapre

The Supreme Court upheld the binding nature of a settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act, ruling that temporary workers' absorption benefits accrue from the date of absorption into permanent cadre as per the settlement terms, not from initial appointment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Badali Kamdar Industrial Disputes Act Section 18 Settlement

Union of India & Anr. v. M/s. Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd.

07 Mar 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld that reimbursed expenses cannot be included in the taxable value for service tax prior to the 2015 amendment, declaring Rule 5 of the Service Tax Rules ultra vires Sections 66 and 67 of the Finance Act, 1994.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax valuation reimbursed expenses gross amount charged