Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Jaspal Singh Kaural v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Apr 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 457
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the discharge of the accused under Sections 376 and 506 IPC, holding that a breached promise to marry does not vitiate consent unless made with dishonest intent from the outset.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent promise to marry Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S. Park Leather Industries Ltd.

07 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; Augustine George Masih
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court remanded the quantum of compensation awarded under an insurance policy to the NCDRC for fresh determination after holding that the earlier assessment was accepted without giving the insurer a fair opportunity to contest new evidence.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 insurance claim repudiation quantum of compensation surveyor's report

KUNCHAM LAVANYA & Ors. v. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & Anr.

07 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 452

The Supreme Court restored the motor accident compensation award holding the insurance company liable, emphasizing that delay in eyewitness testimony does not discredit evidence and negligence is to be judged on preponderance of probabilities.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim eyewitness testimony insurance liability negligence

Murugan v. The State

04 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 446
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the murder conviction due to unreliable circumstantial evidence and unexplained procedural delays, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC extra-judicial confession last seen evidence

G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. v. Inspector of Police & Anr.

04 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 681

The Supreme Court quashed a belated and vexatious FIR alleging cheating and intimidation, holding that the criminal law cannot be misused to settle civil disputes and abuse the process of law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC fraudulent inducement

Kousik Das v. State of West Bengal

04 Apr 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 448

The Supreme Court held that in-service teachers employed as on 10th August 2017 who completed the 18-month D.El.Ed. diploma through NIOS before 31st March 2019 are valid diploma holders entitled to recruitment and promotion, overruling the High Court's exclusionary orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant D.El.Ed. NIOS 18-month diploma 2-year diploma

Sangita Sinha v. Bhawana Bhardwaj

04 Apr 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 450
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that acceptance of refund of earnest money by the buyer during suit pendency amounts to cancellation of the Agreement to Sell, disentitling the buyer from specific performance, and set aside the decree in her favor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance Agreement to Sell readiness and willingness cancellation of contract

Soumen Paul v. Shrabani Nayek

04 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 451

The Supreme Court held that eligibility for teacher recruitment must be assessed as on the last date for receipt of applications per valid recruitment notification, allowing candidates who completed qualifications after notification but before application deadline to participate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant West Bengal Primary School Teachers Recruitment Rules, 2016 National Council for Teacher Education D.El.Ed. qualification Recruitment notification

A Rajendra v. Gonugunta Madhusudhan Rao & Ors.

04 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 447

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as barred by limitation under Section 61(2) of the IBC, holding that the limitation period starts from the date of pronouncement of the order and filing without certified copies is fatal.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 61 limitation condonation of delay certified copy

Jogeswar Sahoo & Ors. v. The District Judge, Cuttack & Ors.

04 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 449
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that recovery of excess financial benefits granted due to erroneous interpretation, without fraud and after retirement, is not justified if ordered without hearing, and set aside such recovery orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant recovery of excess payment retrospective promotion financial benefit opportunity of hearing

State of West Bengal v. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (Chatterjee)

03 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 437
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of the entire 2016 WBSSC recruitment process due to systemic fraud and irregularities, directing fresh selection and recovery of illegal appointments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant WBSSC recruitment OMR manipulation illegal appointments rank jumping

G.C. Manjunath & Others v. Seetaram

03 Apr 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 439
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that prior government sanction under Section 197 CrPC and Section 170 Police Act is mandatory for prosecuting police officers for offences reasonably connected to their official duties, and quashed proceedings initiated without such sanction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 197 CrPC Section 170 Karnataka Police Act prior sanction public servant prosecution

UCO BANK & ANR v. VIJAY KUMAR HANDA

03 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 442
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that an employee removed from service for gross misconduct under Clause 6(b) of the Bipartite Settlement is entitled to pensionary benefits if eligible, dismissing the Bank’s appeal against the High Court’s direction to grant pension.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Bipartite Settlement gross misconduct removal from service pensionary benefits

New Mangalore Port Trust v. Clifford D Souza

03 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 440

The Supreme Court held that acknowledgment of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act extends limitation for recovery under the Public Premises Act and restored writ petitions pending intra-court appeals on retrospective licence fee revision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 18 Limitation Act Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Acknowledgment of liability

Ram Kishan v. State of Haryana

03 Apr 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 441
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for lands acquired in Dharuhera by applying principles of de-escalation to prior awards in adjoining villages, emphasizing potentiality and proper valuation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation market value de-escalation

M/S R. K. TRANSPORT COMPANY v. M/S BHARAT ALUMINUM COMPANY LTD.

03 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 438

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for filing a Section 34 application excludes the date of receipt of the arbitral award and extends to the next working day if the last day falls on a court holiday, dismissing the appeal and upholding the High Court’s order allowing the application as timely.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 application Limitation Act, 1963 Section 12 Limitation Act

Manish v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

02 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 430
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC, holding that mere breach of contract without dishonest intention at inception does not constitute cheating.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Cheating Dishonest intention Commercial dispute

THE MANAGEMENT OF WORTH TRUST v. THE SECRETARY, WORTH TRUST WORKERS UNION

02 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 432

The Supreme Court held that a charitable trust engaged in commercial manufacturing activities is liable to pay statutory bonus to its factory workers under the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, rejecting exemption claims under Section 32.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 32 exemption Factories Act, 1948 charitable trust

Vinay Aggarwal v. State of Haryana

02 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 433

The Supreme Court held that transfer of investigation to CBI under Section 482 CrPC is an extraordinary power to be exercised sparingly and set aside the High Court order directing CBI probe in a case of alleged impersonation and extortion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant CBI investigation Section 482 CrPC impersonation abuse of process

Maukam Singh & Others v. State of Madhya Pradesh

02 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 435

The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction of appellants who, armed with deadly weapons, attacked the deceased and his family with premeditation, rejecting the defense of accidental injury.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder premeditation ocular evidence