Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Sushila & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 505

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against husband's relatives under dowry and cruelty laws due to lack of specific allegations and the dissolution of marriage by divorce.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of complaint Section 482 CrPC

State of Rajasthan v. Combined Traders

16 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 496

The Supreme Court held that the State Government lacks power to cancel declaration forms under the CST Act, rendering sub-rule (20) of Rule 17 of Rajasthan Rules ultra vires and invalid.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 rule-making power declaration forms Form C

Rikhab Birani & Anr v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr

16 Apr 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 512
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants in a property sale dispute, holding that breach of contract without fraudulent intent does not constitute a criminal offence under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant breach of contract cheating criminal breach of trust Section 420 IPC

R.B.A.N.M.S. Educational Institution v. B. Gunashekar & Another

16 Apr 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 490

The Supreme Court held that a plaint based solely on an unregistered agreement to sell, lacking privity with the defendant and without a registered sale deed, does not disclose a cause of action and must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC agreement to sell cause of action Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Suresh C. Singal & Ors. v. The State of Gujarat & Ors.

16 Apr 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 495
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings initiated by CBI in a commercial loan dispute settled between the parties, holding that continuation of prosecution would be oppressive and an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC civil dispute commercial transaction

Irwan Kour v. Punjab Public Service Commission

16 Apr 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 494

The Supreme Court held that Indian Military Nursing Service personnel qualify as ex-servicemen under Punjab state rules and are entitled to reservation benefits in state civil service recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant ex-servicemen reservation Indian Military Nursing Service Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Servicemen Rules, 1982 Military Nursing Service Ordinance, 1943

S.C. Garg v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

16 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 493

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a managing director for offences under IPC Section 420, holding that res judicata bars prosecution on issues decided in earlier NI Act proceedings and that prosecution without arraigning the company is not maintainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability arraignment of company

Satish Chander Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh

16 Apr 2025 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 491
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's repeal of the 1999 pension scheme with a cut-off date, dismissed the writ petition challenging the binding Rajesh Chander Sood judgment, and reaffirmed that pension rights under such schemes are subject to administrative review and financial viability.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant pension scheme repeal cut-off date vested right Article 14 equality

Pinki v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 482
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to accused in an interstate child trafficking racket, emphasizing stringent judicial scrutiny in such serious offences to protect victims and ensure effective prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child trafficking bail cancellation interstate kidnapping Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC

Rajendhiran v. Muthaiammal @ Muthayee & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 508

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment allowing a suit based on unproven oral partition and will, reinstating the dismissal of the suit by lower courts for lack of evidence and non-joinder of necessary parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant oral partition will proof Section 68 Indian Evidence Act Section 63 Indian Succession Act

Varshatai v. The State of Maharashtra

15 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 486

The Supreme Court upheld the lawful use of Urdu alongside Marathi on a Municipal Council signboard, affirming constitutional recognition of multiple official languages and dismissing the appellant's challenge under Maharashtra's official language laws.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Official language Urdu language Marathi language Maharashtra Local Authorities (Official Languages) Act, 2022

JANSHRUTI (PEOPLE’S VOICE) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

15 Apr 2025 · Surya Kant; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 536

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 498A IPC, dismissed the petition seeking gender-neutral reforms, and emphasized judicial restraint in legislative matters despite concerns of misuse.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC constitutional validity Article 32 Constitution gender-neutral legislation

Suresh Kumar Agarwal v. M/s. Haldia Steels Limited & Anr.

15 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 636

The Supreme Court held that a belated complaint alleging breach of contract without cognizable offence cannot sustain criminal proceedings and set aside the High Court’s order directing further investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant breach of contract cognizable offence closure report further investigation

Nikhila Divyang Mehta & Anr. v. Hitesh P. Sanghvi & Ors.

15 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 485

The Supreme Court held that a suit for declaration of a Will and Codicil filed beyond the three-year limitation period is barred by limitation and the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without requiring evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Limitation Act 1963 Article 58 Limitation Act declaration suit

Prayas Tyagi v. Secretary General, Supreme Court of India and Ors

09 Apr 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:2510

The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of candidature of a candidate with pending criminal proceedings during recruitment, holding that subsequent acquittal does not automatically entitle appointment and employer discretion must be respected.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of candidature criminal antecedents public employment disclosure of criminal case

Prabhjot Kaur v. State of Punjab

09 Apr 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 479

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of reservation for women in a government post as per the advertisement issued before roster amendments, holding that recruitment rules cannot be changed midway through the process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation for women horizontal reservation vertical reservation roster system

R. Nagaraj v. Rajmani

09 Apr 2025 · R. Mahadevan; J. B. Pardiwala · 2025 INSC 478

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in remanding a second appeal for fresh trial on limitation without deciding the substantial question of law, restoring the dismissal of a suit barred by limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 100 CPC Limitation Act 1963 Second appeal Substantial question of law

NEHA ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX

09 Apr 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 476

The Supreme Court held that input tax credit cannot be claimed on sales turnover exempt under section 7(c) of the Uttar Pradesh VAT Act, 2008, as prohibited by section 13(7), dismissing the dealer’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant input tax credit Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008 section 7(c) section 13(7)

EPC Constructions India Limited Through Its Liquidator - Abhijit Guhathakurta v. M/s Matix Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited

09 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1259

The Supreme Court held that holders of cumulative redeemable preference shares are shareholders and not financial creditors under the IBC, and thus cannot initiate insolvency proceedings under Section 7.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares financial debt financial creditor Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Neha Chandrakant Shroff & Anr v. State of Maharashtra & Ors

08 Apr 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 484

The Supreme Court allowed the writ petition directing the State to return possession of two flats occupied since 1940 without written requisition, emphasizing the discretionary exercise of writ jurisdiction to prevent injustice despite alternative remedies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ jurisdiction possession requisition