Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

M/S SURAJ IMPEX (INDIA) PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

22 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 755

The Supreme Court held that CBEC Circular No. 35/2010-Cus. clarifying entitlement to AIR customs duty drawback is clarificatory and retrospective, entitling exporters to benefits from 2008 despite the Circular's stated effective date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant All Industry Rate (AIR) Duty Drawback Customs Circular No. 35/2010-Cus. retrospective effect clarificatory circular

State represented by Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Visakhapatnam v. Eluri Srinivasa Chakravarthi and Others

22 May 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 758
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside discharge orders relying on extraneous documents at charge framing stage, directing fresh exercise of jurisdiction under section 239 CrPC based solely on prosecution material.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 239 CrPC charge framing discharge of accused Minimum Support Price

State of Kerala & Another v. Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd. & Others

22 May 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 757

The Supreme Court held that States cannot levy entertainment tax on DTH broadcasting services as the activity falls exclusively under the Union's legislative competence to tax broadcasting services.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Direct-to-Home (DTH) services Entertainment tax Service tax Seventh Schedule

CHADURANGA KANTHARAJ URS v. S.V. RANGANATH

22 May 2025 · M.M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 762

The Supreme Court held that wilful disobedience of its orders regarding issuance of development rights certificates constitutes contempt and directed strict compliance without entertaining fresh conditions or delays.

administrative contempt_petition_disposed Significant contempt of court wilful disobedience Development Rights Certificates Transferable Development Rights

Padman Bibhar v. State of Odisha

21 May 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 751

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant, holding that conviction solely on 'last seen together' evidence without a complete and conclusive chain of circumstances is unsustainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen together circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC

Selukar and Ors. v. Mahendra Bhaskar Limaye and Ors.

21 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; M. M. Sundresh · 2025 INSC 752

The Supreme Court struck down arbitrary eligibility and appointment provisions in the Consumer Protection Rules, mandating judicial dominance, objective selection procedures, and minimum five-year tenure for consumer fora members to uphold constitutional principles and ensure effective consumer justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Consumer fora appointments Eligibility criteria Article 14 equality

Dileep Kumar Pandey v. Union of India

21 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 749

The Supreme Court held that the Air Force School, Bamrauli, discharging a public function under pervasive control of the Indian Air Force, is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, though not a 'state' under Article 12 for service matters.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India State definition Writ jurisdiction

Gyan Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.

21 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 753

The Supreme Court directed effective enforcement of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002, mandating regular inspections, removal of encroachments, and establishment of grievance redressal mechanisms to ensure highway safety.

administrative other Significant Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 unauthorized occupation highway encroachments Highway Administration

Lt. Col NK Ghai (Retd.) v. Union of India and Another

21 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 750

The Supreme Court directed reconsideration of the appellant's promotion grading by the Chief of Army Staff, emphasizing fairness in military promotion decisions under Defence Services Regulations.

military_service_law appeal_partly_allowed Significant Territorial Army Regulations, 1948 Defence Services Regulations, 1987 promotion Selection Board

Nagam Janardhan Reddy v. State of Telangana & Others

21 May 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 798

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the revision of project estimates as a matter unsuitable for writ jurisdiction and upheld the High Court's refusal to order a CBI investigation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Public Interest Litigation Writ Petition Article 226 Constructive Res Judicata

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India and Others

21 May 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 748

The Supreme Court quashed the Madhya Pradesh Government Order assigning IAS officers as appraisal authorities for IFS officers, reaffirming that Performance Appraisal Reports must be written by immediate superior officers within the Forest Department as per established legal principles and prior Court directions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Forest Service Performance Appraisal Report Reporting Authority Reviewing Authority

All India Judges Association v. Union of India

20 May 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 735

The Supreme Court restored the 25% LDCE quota for promotion to Higher Judicial Service, reduced eligibility experience requirements, introduced a quota for junior division promotions, mandated suitability tests, and reinstated minimum practice requirements for judicial service entry.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Higher Judicial Service District Judge promotion Judicial service eligibility

S. JANAKI IYER v. UNION OF INDIA

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 742
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a government employee for misconduct under a fake transfer order, affirming that procedural lapses without prejudice do not vitiate departmental inquiries.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant natural justice departmental inquiry preliminary inquiry report Rule 15(2) CCS (CCA) Rules 1965

A.M. Kulshrestha v. Union Bank of India

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 744
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that disciplinary proceedings involving vigilance angle require prior CVC consultation before issuing a charge sheet, quashing the Bank's proceedings initiated without such advice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Regulation 19 Union Bank of India Officers Employees’ (Discipline & Appeal) Regulations, 1976 Central Vigilance Commission first-stage advice

Rajni v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 737

The Supreme Court upheld the determination of respondent No. 2 as a juvenile based on credible school certificates and affirmed the grant of bail, emphasizing documentary evidence over medical tests for age determination under the Juvenile Justice Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant juvenile justice age determination juvenile in conflict with law juvenile bail

K. H. Kamaladini v. State

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 745

The Supreme Court upheld charges for forgery and criminal breach of trust but set aside charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, clarifying the limited scope of judicial scrutiny at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant charge framing discharge plea forgery criminal breach of trust

Shital Fibers Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 743

The Supreme Court held that Section 80-IA(9) restricts aggregate deductions under Chapter VI-A heading 'C' to profits and gains already claimed but does not require reducing gross total income for computing other deductions like Section 80-HHC.

tax other Significant Section 80-IA Section 80-HHC Chapter VI-A Income Tax Act, 1961

Rampat Azad v. Union of India

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 740

The Supreme Court upheld the CAT and High Court orders denying the appellant promotion as Handicrafts Promotion Officer, affirming his regularisation and promotion rights solely within the cadre of Carpet Training Officer.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Regularisation Promotion Junior Field Officer Carpet Training Officer

Ramjee Prasad Jaiswal and Ors v. State of Bihar

20 May 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 738
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the convictions of appellants due to failure to comply with Section 313 CrPC and established juvenility of one appellant, emphasizing the mandatory nature of procedural fairness and juvenility claims in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC juvenility juvenile justice audi alteram partem

Shaifali Gupta v. Vidya Devi Gupta & Ors.

20 May 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 739

The Supreme Court held that a plaint in a partition suit involving alleged joint Hindu family properties cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on benami grounds without evidence, dismissing the Special Leave Petitions challenging the rejection of such applications.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 benami property joint Hindu family property