Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa v. Rajiv Nareshchandra Narula

24 Sep 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1147
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed disciplinary proceedings against an advocate for lack of prima facie satisfaction under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders before referral to disciplinary inquiry.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Advocates Act, 1961 Section 35 professional misconduct Bar Council

U.P. ASBESTOS LIMITED v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS

24 Sep 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1154

The Supreme Court upheld a Rajasthan VAT exemption on asbestos cement products containing fly ash, ruling it constitutionally valid differentiation under Article 304(a) and not discriminatory against inter-State trade.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 301 Constitution of India Article 304(a) Constitution of India Value Added Tax exemption Discrimination in taxation

HLV Limited v. PBSAMP Projects Pvt. Ltd.

24 Sep 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1148

The Supreme Court held that compound interest cannot be claimed beyond the simple interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal under a contractually agreed interest regime, restoring the executing court's order rejecting such claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 31(7) Arbitration and Conciliation Act Compound interest Simple interest

Rajnesh Sharma v. M/S. Business Park Town Planners Ltd.

24 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1149
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court increased the interest rate on delayed possession refund from 9% to 18% per annum, emphasizing fairness and parity with the builder's interest charged on delayed payments.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant consumer protection delay compensation interest rate builder-buyer agreement

RAMA BAI v. M/S AMIT MINERALS

24 Sep 2025 · J. K. Vinod Chandran; N. V. Anjaria
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an insurer is absolved from liability if the driver lacked a valid licence at the time of the accident but must initially pay compensation and recover it from the insured under the 'pay and recover' doctrine.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay and recover motor accident compensation insurance liability valid driving licence

Shobhit Kumar Mittal v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another

24 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1152

The Supreme Court quashed a vague FIR under Sections 323 and 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing the need for specific allegations to prevent misuse of criminal law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act matrimonial dispute

Anukul Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

24 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1153
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings instituted maliciously over a civil dispute, holding that such abuse of process warrants intervention under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR abuse of process malicious prosecution

Satheesh V.K. v. The Federal Bank Ltd.

23 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1140
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that a second special leave petition challenging the same order is not maintainable after unconditional withdrawal of the first without permission, and no appeal lies against an order refusing review, thereby dismissing the appellant's appeals.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant special leave petition withdrawal of SLP maintainability review petition

High Court of Madhya Pradesh v. Jyotsna Dohalia

23 Sep 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Atul S. Chandurkar · 2025 INSC 1137

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction by reopening a dismissed writ petition to direct recomputation of cut-off marks and a fresh examination in judicial service recruitment, and set aside the impugned order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant review jurisdiction recruitment judicial service eligibility criteria

Airports Authority of India v. Commissioner of Service Tax

23 Sep 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 1141

The Supreme Court upheld the levy of service tax on Airports Authority of India's services related to export cargo handling at airports under 'Airport Services' from 10.09.2004, rejecting the exclusion claimed under cargo handling service definition.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax cargo handling service airport services Finance Act 1994

Abhimanue v. State of Kerala

22 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1136
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed appeals against revocation of bail in a murder case, emphasizing the distinction between cancellation and revocation of bail and balancing liberty with trial integrity by imposing stringent bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation of bail revocation of bail heinous crime

Jyotshna Singh v. State of Jharkhand

22 Sep 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1138
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an officer is entitled to retrospective promotion and consequential benefits when departmental proceedings initiated after long delay are quashed, directing compliance with interest for delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant retrospective promotion departmental proceedings delay in initiation punishment set aside

Nagamma @ Nagarathna & Ors. v. The State of Karnataka

22 Sep 2025 · K. Viswanathan; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1135
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and inadmissibility of extra judicial confessions made inside the police station.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence extra judicial confession Section 25 Evidence Act Section 26 Evidence Act

M. Rajendran & Ors. v. M/S KPK Oils and Protiens India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

22 Sep 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1144

The Supreme Court examined the scope of the borrower's right of redemption under amended Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act and the validity of a Sale Certificate issued after auction of secured assets, emphasizing procedural compliance and statutory remedies.

civil other Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(8) right of redemption sale certificate

Surendra Khawse v. State of Madhya Pradesh

22 Sep 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 1143

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and chargesheet alleging rape on the ground that the criminal proceedings were instituted with mala fide intent and an ulterior motive, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS mala fide prosecution

ALL INDIA FOOTBALL FEDERATION v. RAHUL MEHRA

19 Sep 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; JOYMALYA BAGCHI · 2025 INSC 1131
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the inclusion of eminent players with voting rights in AIFF's General Body, refined governance and disqualification norms, and directed expeditious elections under a new Constitution aligned with national and international sports governance standards.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant All India Football Federation National Sports Development Code 2011 FIFA Statutes Eminent Players

Kaveri Plastics v. Mahdoom Bawa BahruDeen Noorul

19 Sep 2025 · B. R. Gavai; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1133

A demand notice under Section 138 of the NI Act must specify the exact cheque amount; any discrepancy, including typographical errors, invalidates the notice and the complaint.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act demand notice cheque dishonour typographical error

M/S QUIPPO ENERGY LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AHMEDABAD – II

19 Sep 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; K.V. VISWANATHAN · 2025 INSC 1130

The Supreme Court held that placing imported Gensets in containers with integral components amounts to manufacture under the Central Excise Act, 1944, attracting excise duty, while setting aside extended period demands and penalties due to bona fide conduct.

tax appeal_allowed Significant manufacture transformation test marketability test Central Excise Act 1944

Nitin Ahluwalia v. State of Punjab & Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1128
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC as malicious and an abuse of process, emphasizing the need to consider foreign court orders and the absence of requisite cruelty ingredients.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR cruelty retaliatory FIR

State of Uttarakhand v. Anil & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1170

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic acquittal judgment for lack of reasoning and remanded the criminal appeals for fresh hearing with proper evaluation of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant High Court appellate jurisdiction Section 374 CrPC judgment of acquittal independent evaluation of evidence