Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Metpalli Lasum Bai v. Metapalli Muthaiah

21 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 879

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a registered Will and family settlement granting exclusive title to plaintiff Lasum Bai over disputed land, reversing the High Court's partial reduction of her share.

civil appeal_allowed Significant registered Will family settlement joint family property possession

TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD v. S. GANESAN

21 Jul 2025 · Dipankar Datta; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 889
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court allowed the Tamil Nadu Housing Board's appeal, closing the respondent's right to payment and directing him to vacate the plot due to prolonged default and failure to comply with payment obligations.

property appeal_allowed Significant public property allotment cancellation default in payment public auction

VICTIM ‘X’ v. STATE OF BIHAR

21 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 877
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court cancelled bail granted to a protection home superintendent accused of sexually exploiting female inmates, emphasizing mandatory victim hearing under the SC/ST Act and the gravity of allegations impacting fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail SC/ST Act Section 15A(3) sexual exploitation

Mala Choudhary v. State of Telangana

18 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 870

The Supreme Court quashed a frivolous FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, holding it to be an abuse of the criminal process in a civil dispute and imposed exemplary costs on the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR abuse of process Section 482 CrPC Article 136 Constitution

Suresh Chandra v. Parasram

18 Jul 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 873

The Supreme Court held that non-substitution of legal representatives of a deceased co-appellant in a joint and indivisible decree leads to abatement of the entire appeal, and Order XLI Rule 4 CPC does not override this requirement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant abatement of appeal non-substitution of legal representatives Order XXII CPC Order XLI Rule 4 CPC

BGM AND M-RPL-JMCT (JV) v. EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED

18 Jul 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 874

The Supreme Court held that a dispute resolution clause using permissive language does not constitute a binding arbitration agreement, and the court must be prima facie satisfied of such existence before appointing an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration Act prima facie examination consensus ad idem

Kaushal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

18 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 871
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court expunged High Court strictures against a Judicial Officer for granting bail without considering criminal antecedents, emphasizing restraint in judicial criticism and adherence to natural justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant judicial officer strictures bail application criminal antecedents principle of parity

M Sambasiva Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

17 Jul 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 868

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction in a corruption case due to unreliable trap evidence, contradictions, and failure to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, reinstating the Trial Court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 demand and acceptance of bribe trap proceedings adverse inference

Sunita & Ors. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

17 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 867
Cites 9 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a driver with an LMV license can drive a commercial vehicle under 7500 kg and that the Insurance Company must indemnify the claimant under the "Pay and Recover" principle despite policy breach, enhancing compensation awarded.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Light Motor Vehicle license Liability Only Policy Pay and Recover principle

Narayan Das v. State of Chhattisgarh

17 Jul 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 872

The Supreme Court clarified that under Section 32-B of the NDPS Act, courts have discretion to impose sentences above the minimum prescribed by considering relevant factors beyond those enumerated, and upheld the conviction while dismissing the petition.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 32-B minimum sentence higher punishment

Gurdial Singh v. Jagir Kaur and Anr.

17 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 866
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of a Will due to suspicious circumstances arising from the non-mention of the lawful wife and failure to explain her disinheritance, holding that the Will was not executed with free disposing mind.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Will Suspicious circumstances Free disposing mind Disinheritance

M/S SONALI POWER EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD. v. CHAIRMAN, MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

17 Jul 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; JOYMALYA BAGCHI · 2025 INSC 864
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act applies to arbitration but not conciliation under the MSMED Act, allowing recovery of time-barred debts through conciliation settlements but not arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 MSMED Act, 2006 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 18 MSMED Act

RAM CHARAN v. SUKHRAM

17 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 865

The Supreme Court held that tribal women or their heirs are entitled to equal inheritance rights in ancestral property under the principle of justice, equity and good conscience and Article 14, setting aside lower courts' denial of such rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Tribe inheritance tribal woman property rights justice equity good conscience Article 14 equality

Shiv Baran v. State of U.P. & Anr.

16 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 860

The Supreme Court held that under Section 319 CrPC, a person not originally accused can be summoned for trial based on cogent evidence adduced during examination-in-chief, even if not charge-sheeted, and set aside the High Court's quashing of such summons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summoning additional accused examination-in-chief evidence prima facie satisfaction

Tosh Kumar Sharma v. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

16 Jul 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 921

The Supreme Court held that a vacancy caused by non-approval of a recommended candidate in judicial service recruitment must be filled from the same merit list, allowing the appellant's appointment and setting aside the High Court's decision to carry forward the vacancy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 Rule 8(2) judicial appointments merit list

Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation

16 Jul 2025 · M. M. Sundresh; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 909

The Supreme Court held that notices under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 affecting personal liberty cannot be served through electronic communication and must be served by prescribed statutory modes to safeguard constitutional rights.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 35 BNSS 2023 electronic communication service of notice personal liberty

The State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr v. JSW Hydro Energy Limited & Ors.

16 Jul 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 857

The Supreme Court held that the CERC tariff regulations capping free power at 13% do not override a generating company’s contractual obligation to supply 18% free power to the State, and the High Court erred in modifying the contract via writ jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 CERC Regulations, 2019 free power supply Implementation Agreement

Nayakara Thippaiah v. State of Karnataka

16 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 862

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for the brutal murders of five family members but commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment after considering mitigating factors and reports on his mental health and conduct.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder death penalty rarest of rare Section 302 IPC

JAI PRAKASH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

16 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 861

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape and murder of a child but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment, emphasizing the need for objective application of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant rarest of rare doctrine death penalty sexual assault child victim

Mala Devi v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 855

The Supreme Court held that a temporary railway servant who dies in harness after one year of continuous service is entitled to family pension irrespective of regularization or completion of 10 years, allowing the widow's claim.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant family pension temporary railway servant Railway Pension Rules, 1993 continuous service