Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

M/S QUIPPO ENERGY LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AHMEDABAD – II

19 Sep 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; K.V. VISWANATHAN · 2025 INSC 1130

The Supreme Court held that placing imported Gensets in containers with integral components amounts to manufacture under the Central Excise Act, 1944, attracting excise duty, while setting aside extended period demands and penalties due to bona fide conduct.

tax appeal_allowed Significant manufacture transformation test marketability test Central Excise Act 1944

Nitin Ahluwalia v. State of Punjab & Anr.

18 Sep 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1128
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed an FIR under Section 498-A IPC as malicious and an abuse of process, emphasizing the need to consider foreign court orders and the absence of requisite cruelty ingredients.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR cruelty retaliatory FIR

State of Uttarakhand v. Anil & Ors.

18 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1170

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's cryptic acquittal judgment for lack of reasoning and remanded the criminal appeals for fresh hearing with proper evaluation of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant High Court appellate jurisdiction Section 374 CrPC judgment of acquittal independent evaluation of evidence

Thammineni Bhaskar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

17 Sep 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 1124
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder and kidnapping charges due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of circumstantial evidence and hostile witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory hostile witnesses kidnapping

VADDI RATNAM v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

17 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1180

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant under the NDPS Act applying the principle of parity following the acquittal of the co-accused due to failure to prove conscious possession of contraband beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act conscious possession principle of parity commercial quantity

Rajesh Kumar v. State of Jharkhand

16 Sep 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 1146
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed reinstatement of a teacher appointed under a reservation quota despite eligibility doubts, quashing termination and salary recovery orders, while denying back wages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Government-aided minority school reservation quota Trained Graduate Teacher appointment

Dastagirsab v. Sharanappa

16 Sep 2025 · Sandeep Mehta; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1120

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a sale of joint family property by the Karta for legal necessity, holding the purchaser bona fide and dismissing the challenge by a coparcener.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Undivided Family Karta legal necessity alienation of joint family property

State of Haryana v. Jai Singh and Others

16 Sep 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1122
Cites 0 · Cited by 22

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Haryana's amendment defining 'shamilat deh', holding that lands reserved for common purposes vest in Gram Panchayats while unutilized bachat lands remain with proprietors, clarifying acquisition and compensation principles under Article 31-A.

property appeal_allowed Significant shamilat deh Punjab Village Common Lands Act Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992 Consolidation Act of 1948

BHAWNA JAIN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

16 Sep 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1217

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a guarantor where a second complaint was filed concealing the earlier withdrawn complaint, holding such continuation an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR abuse of process guarantor liability withdrawal of complaint

The State of Arunachal Pradesh v. Mihin Laling

16 Sep 2025 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1186

The Supreme Court held that compensation for acquisition of 'Jhum' lands under the 1947 Regulations must include solatium and interest as per the 2013 Act, while protecting finality of concluded acquisitions.

property appeal_allowed Significant Jhum land acquisition Balipara/Tirap/Sadiya Frontier Tract Jhum Land Regulation, 1947 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 reasonable compensation

Jameela & Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

15 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1121
Cites 0 · Cited by 10

The Supreme Court set aside conviction under section 195-A IPC for being retrospective but upheld conviction under section 506-B IPC for criminal intimidation causing suicide, directing reconsideration of service termination and terminal benefits.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 195-A IPC Section 506-B IPC Article 20(1) Constitution of India criminal intimidation

X v. State of Kerala & Another

15 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1243

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to facilitate amicable settlement by directing restitution of money and gold in a rape and cheating case while upholding the principle that serious offences require investigation and custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Neelkanth Realty Private Limited & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1255
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary limitation issue decided on demurrer in arbitration does not foreclose re-examination on evidence and that an arbitral award deciding limitation without evidence violates fundamental policy of Indian law, justifying judicial interference.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant demurrer limitation arbitration Section 34 Arbitration Act

Assistant General Manager State Bank of India & Anr. v. Tanya Energy Enterprises

15 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1119
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory upfront payment under the OTS 2020 Scheme disentitles a borrower from having the application processed, setting aside the High Court's direction to consider such application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant One Time Settlement Scheme SARFAESI Act secured creditor upfront payment

The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025

15 Sep 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH · 2025 INSC 1116
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, rejecting challenges that the amendments violated fundamental rights or legislative competence.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 Waqf by User Constitutional validity Articles 14, 15, 25, 26

ba3cb2fc0f71cba9dc21fe765b6fa931cf5c2f2b0be883f98e74ba62ad3578d5

15 Sep 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1117
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a re-trial is an exceptional remedy not justified merely by procedural lapses in recording video evidence or non-examination of the Chemical Examiner, and restored the appeals for fresh consideration by the High Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant re-trial video evidence Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Chemical Examiner

Paramjeet Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

15 Sep 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1118
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC for lack of fraudulent intention and abuse of process, emphasizing that breach of contract alone does not constitute cheating.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC cheating fraudulent intention Section 482 CrPC

Mamman Khan v. State of Haryana

12 Sep 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1113

The Supreme Court held that segregation of trial solely on the basis of the accused's status as a sitting MLA without legal justification violates statutory provisions and constitutional rights, mandating a joint trial with co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant segregation of trial joint trial separate trial Section 223 Cr.P.C.

ANNA WAMAN BHALERAO v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1114

The Supreme Court dismissed anticipatory bail appeals of revenue officials accused of certifying mutation entries based on forged documents, emphasizing the necessity of balancing personal liberty with investigation and directing expeditious disposal of bail applications.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC personal liberty delay in FIR

Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India v. Union of India & Others

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1112
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that General Conditions under the EIA 2006 Notification do not apply to building and construction projects, affirming State-level appraisal and setting aside the NGT order mandating central appraisal.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006 General Conditions Building and Construction Projects Township and Area Development Projects