Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

BALJINDER KUMAR @ KALA v. STATE OF PUNJAB

16 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 856

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a multiple murder case due to material contradictions in key eyewitness testimonies and investigative deficiencies, setting aside the death sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant eyewitness testimony contradictions in evidence rarest of rare doctrine death penalty

Krishna Swaroopagarwal Thr. LR. v. Arvind Kumar

16 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 859
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that service of notice by registered post is deemed service under law, and set aside the High Court's order invalidating an ejectment decree on the ground of non-delivery of notice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant service of notice registered post deemed service Section 106 Transfer of Property Act

Birka Shiva v. State of Telangana

16 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 863
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping, wrongful confinement, and rape charges due to insufficient proof of the victim's age and absence of evidence of force or coercion.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant age proof school register Section 35 Indian Evidence Act kidnapping lawful guardianship

Jaykishor Chaturvedi v. Securities and Exchange Board of India

15 Jul 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 846
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld SEBI's authority to levy retrospective interest on unpaid penalties from the date of adjudication orders under Section 28A of the SEBI Act read with Income Tax Act provisions, dismissing the appellants' challenge to recovery proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant SEBI Act Section 28A Interest on penalty Adjudication order

Neethu B. @ Neethu Baby Mathew v. Rajesh Kumar

15 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 853

The Supreme Court allowed review of its earlier custody order based on new psychological evidence, restoring permanent custody to the mother while granting the father visitation rights to protect the child's best interests.

family appeal_allowed Significant child custody review jurisdiction best interest of child psychological assessment

G. Kalawathi Bai v. G. Shashikala

15 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 851

The Supreme Court held that a power-of-attorney holder executing a document does not become its executant for registration purposes and must comply with authentication requirements under the Registration Act, 1908, overruling the contrary view in Rajni Tandon.

property other Significant Power of Attorney Registration Act 1908 Section 32 Section 33

Vijay Kumar v. Central Bank of India

15 Jul 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 848
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Supreme Court held that reduction of pension on compulsory retirement requires prior consultation with the Board of Directors under Regulation 33 of the Central Bank of India Pension Regulations, and set aside the pension reduction order for lack of such consultation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pension rights compulsory retirement prior consultation Board of Directors

Kattavellai @ Devakar v. State of Tamil Nadu

15 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 845

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's conviction and death sentence in a double murder case due to unreliable circumstantial evidence, weak confession, and faulty investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory extra-judicial confession DNA evidence

M/S TORINO LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA

15 Jul 2025 · K.V. Viswanathan; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 849

The Supreme Court upheld the clubbing of two pharmaceutical companies as one establishment under the EPF Act based on cumulative factors of unity in management, finance, premises, and purpose, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 clubbing of establishments unity of ownership functional integrality

Pradeep Bhardwaj v. Priya

15 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 852
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage under its constitutional power, overturning lower courts' rejection despite unproven cruelty allegations.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage divorce cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Krishan Gopal v. Gurmeet Kaur & Ors.

15 Jul 2025 · Sanjay Kumar; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 850
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld specific performance of a land sale agreement, invalidated subsequent sale deeds executed pendente lite, and affirmed the court's power to grant possession suo motu under the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 52 Transfer of Property Act doctrine of lis pendens

PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Manoj Saha

15 Jul 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 847

The Supreme Court held that possession taken under SARFAESI Act is valid against unregistered tenancy claims lacking evidence, and High Courts should not interfere where alternate statutory remedies exist.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act tenancy rights unregistered lease possession

G. MOHANDAS v. STATE OF KERALA

15 Jul 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 854

The Supreme Court upheld criminal proceedings against a building owner and municipal officials for conspiracy to illegally construct a commercial building in a prohibited zone, rejecting the plea for quashing based on subsequent regularisation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conspiracy Prevention of Corruption Act municipal building rules illegal construction

L. Muruganantham v. State of Tamil Nadu & Others

15 Jul 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 844
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld enhanced compensation for illegal arrest and police harassment of a disabled prisoner while dismissing claims against prison authorities, emphasizing the need for systemic reforms to ensure rights and accommodations for prisoners with disabilities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 human rights violation prisoners with disabilities compensation

ARUN KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

14 Jul 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; JOYMALYA BAGCHI · 2025 INSC 826

The Supreme Court dismissed civil appeals challenging the NGT order due to suppression of parallel proceedings and held that challenges based on Petroleum Rules, 2002 are not maintainable before the NGT.

environmental appeal_dismissed Significant National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Petroleum Rules, 2002 No Objection Certificate Environmental litigation

M/S. STEMCYTE INDIA THERAPEUTICS PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, AHMEDABAD - III

14 Jul 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 841
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that stem cell banking services qualify as exempt healthcare services under Notification No. 25/2012-ST, set aside service tax demands and penalties for the disputed period, and ruled the extended limitation period inapplicable without fraud or suppression.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Healthcare Services Service Tax Exemption Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells Notification No. 25/2012-ST

Mandeep Singh v. State of Punjab

14 Jul 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 834

The Supreme Court held that the Punjab State's bypassing of the Public Service Commission and violation of binding UGC Regulations in recruiting Assistant Professors and Librarians was arbitrary and unlawful, quashing the recruitment process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 320(3)(a) Constitution Punjab Public Service Commission UGC Regulations 2010 Recruitment procedure

Suhagrani and Others v. Manager Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd

14 Jul 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 837

The Supreme Court reinstated the MACT award holding that credible eyewitness evidence of the pillion rider establishes insurer liability in a motor accident claim, and affirmed the compensation with modified apportionment among dependents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 compensation motor accident claim

Binod Pathak v. Shankar Choudhary

14 Jul 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 842

The Supreme Court held that failure of a party's pleader to inform the court of the party's death disentitles that party from claiming abatement of appeal under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC, emphasizing the salutary duty under Rule 10A CPC to ensure substantial justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXII Rule 10A CPC abatement substitution of legal heirs pleader's duty

M/S UNITED SPIRITS LTD v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

14 Jul 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 833

The Supreme Court upheld the levy of entry tax on manufacturers of IMFL, holding they caused the entry of goods into the local area and are liable to pay entry tax under the M.P. Entry Tax Act, 1976, despite the absence of a notification under Section 3B.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant entry tax Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act, 1976 Indian Made Foreign Liquor dealer liability