Supreme Court of India

16,356 judgments

Year:

Subed Ali and Others v. State of Assam

30 Sep 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions under Sections 302/34 IPC, affirming that common intention extends liability to all participants present and facilitating the crime, even without direct assault.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention benefit of doubt

Neetu Yadav v. Sachin Yadav

30 Sep 2020 · V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court allowed the transfer of a divorce petition from New Delhi to Indore, emphasizing convenience and lack of evidence of judicial bias.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition divorce petition family court judicial bias

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Amit Shrivas

29 Sep 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Aniruddha Bose; Krishna Murari · 2020 INSC 565

The Supreme Court held that a work-charged employee classified as permanent under pension rules is not entitled to compassionate appointment under the 2008 policy excluding such employees, but enhanced the compassionate grant payable to the family.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment work-charged employee permanent employee regular employee

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Amit Shrivas

29 Sep 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Aniruddha Bose; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that a work-charged employee classified as permanent under Pension Rules is not entitled to compassionate appointment under the 2008 policy excluding such employees, but enhanced the compassionate grant payable to the family.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment work-charged employee permanent employee regular employee

Maheshwar Tigga v. State of Jharkhand

28 Sep 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges, holding that consent given in a mature love affair with a promise to marry is not vitiated by misconception of fact and emphasizing the necessity of thorough Section 313 Cr.P.C. examination for a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent rape promise to marry Section 376 IPC

Maheshwar Tigga v. State of Jharkhand

28 Sep 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges, holding that consent given on a promise to marry in a long-standing relationship is not consent under misconception of fact and emphasizing the necessity of thorough Section 313 Cr.P.C. examination for a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent promise to marry Section 376 IPC Section 313 CrPC

Anwar Ali and another v. The State of Himachal Pradesh

25 Sep 2020 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy · 2020 INSC 563
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction reversing the trial court's acquittal in a circumstantial evidence murder case, holding that the High Court erred in interfering without cogent reasons and that the trial court's findings were not perverse.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal circumstantial evidence Section 378 CrPC reappreciation of evidence

Anwar Ali and another v. The State of Himachal Pradesh

25 Sep 2020 · M.R. Shah; Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction reversing the trial court's acquittal in a circumstantial evidence murder case, holding that the High Court erred in interfering without cogent reasons and that the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appeal against acquittal circumstantial evidence Section 378 Cr.P.C. reappreciation of evidence

Beli Ram v. Rajinder Kumar

23 Sep 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Aniruddha Bose; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that permitting a driver to drive with an expired licence constitutes breach of insurance policy conditions, absolving the insurer of liability and imposing responsibility on the insured employer.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant expired driving licence insurance liability Workmen’s Compensation Act Motor Vehicles Act

Beli Ram v. Rajinder Kumar

23 Sep 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Aniruddha Bose; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court held that an expired and unrenewed driving licence absolves the insurer of liability due to breach of policy conditions, but the employer remains liable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to compensate the injured driver.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant expired driving licence insurance liability Workmen’s Compensation Act Motor Vehicles Act

Union of India v. G S Chatha Rice Mills

23 Sep 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2020 INSC 561

The Supreme Court held that the enhanced customs duty notification issued post-Pulwama attack does not apply retrospectively to bills of entry filed earlier that day, affirming that the rate of duty is fixed on the date of presentation of the bill of entry under Section 15 of the Customs Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs duty Section 15 Customs Act Section 8A Customs Tariff Act bill of entry

Union of India v. G S Chatha Rice Mills

23 Sep 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that the enhanced customs duty notification issued post-presentation of bills of entry cannot be applied retrospectively, affirming that the rate of duty is determined by the date of bill of entry presentation under Section 15 of the Customs Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Customs Act, 1962 Section 15 Section 8A notification

National Alliance for People’s Movements v. The State of Maharashtra

22 Sep 2020 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the reasonableness of the High Powered Committee's classification for interim bail during COVID-19, dismissing the petition challenging exclusion of certain prisoner categories.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant interim bail COVID-19 pandemic prisoner release reasonable classification

State of Kerala v. M/S RDS Project Limited

22 Sep 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee · 2020 INSC 559

The Supreme Court held that the State Government's decision to demolish and reconstruct the Palarivattom Flyover based on expert committee reports was not arbitrary, setting aside the High Court's order mandating a load test.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Palarivattom Flyover load test expert committee judicial review

State of Kerala v. M/S RDS Project Limited

22 Sep 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that judicial interference in technical decisions based on expert committee reports is limited and set aside the High Court's direction for a load test before demolishing the Palarivattom Flyover.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant judicial review expert committee technical opinion public infrastructure

Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla & Anr. v. National Law School of India University, Bengaluru & Ors.

21 Sep 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah · 2020 INSC 557
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that NLSIU's unilateral conduct of a separate admission test without Academic Council's concurrence and contrary to Consortium Bye-Laws is invalid, directing admission through CLAT only.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant National Law School of India Act, 1986 Executive Council Academic Council Common Law Admission Test (CLAT)

Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla & Anr. v. National Law School of India University, Bengaluru & Ors.

21 Sep 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy; M.R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that NLSIU's Executive Council validly conducted a separate admission test in 2020 without Academic Council concurrence due to COVID-19 delays, rejecting locus objections and upholding the University's administrative autonomy.

constitutional other Significant National Law School of India Act, 1986 Executive Council powers Academic Council concurrence Common Law Admission Test (CLAT)

B. Santoshamma v. D. Sarala

18 Sep 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld partial specific performance of a sale agreement for 200 square yards of land, excluding 100 square yards sold by registered deed to a third party, emphasizing the necessity of readiness and willingness and the binding effect of registered deeds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance partial specific performance Section 12 Specific Relief Act registered sale deed

B. Santoshamma v. D. Sarala

18 Sep 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld partial specific performance of a sale agreement for immovable property, affirming that a registered sale deed to a third party prevails and that specific performance can be granted in part under Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement for sale registered sale deed Section 12 Specific Relief Act

SAGUFA AHMED & ORS. v. UPPER ASSAM PLYWOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

18 Sep 2020 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian · 2020 INSC 555
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that the limitation for filing an appeal under the Companies Act starts from receipt of the certified copy, and COVID-19 related extension of limitation does not apply to condonation of delay beyond statutory limits.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 421(3) limitation period condonation of delay