Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

State of Haryana v. Jai Singh and Others

16 Sep 2025 · B.R. Gavai; Prashant Kumar Mishra; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1122
Cites 0 · Cited by 21

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Haryana's amendment defining 'shamilat deh', holding that lands reserved for common purposes vest in Gram Panchayats while unutilized bachat lands remain with proprietors, clarifying acquisition and compensation principles under Article 31-A.

property appeal_allowed Significant shamilat deh Punjab Village Common Lands Act Haryana Act No. 9 of 1992 Consolidation Act of 1948

BHAWNA JAIN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

16 Sep 2025 · Rajesh Bindal; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 1217

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a guarantor where a second complaint was filed concealing the earlier withdrawn complaint, holding such continuation an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR abuse of process guarantor liability withdrawal of complaint

The State of Arunachal Pradesh v. Mihin Laling

16 Sep 2025 · Surya Kant; Joymalya Bagchi · 2025 INSC 1186

The Supreme Court held that compensation for acquisition of 'Jhum' lands under the 1947 Regulations must include solatium and interest as per the 2013 Act, while protecting finality of concluded acquisitions.

property appeal_allowed Significant Jhum land acquisition Balipara/Tirap/Sadiya Frontier Tract Jhum Land Regulation, 1947 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 reasonable compensation

Jameela & Ors. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

15 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1121
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court set aside conviction under section 195-A IPC for being retrospective but upheld conviction under section 506-B IPC for criminal intimidation causing suicide, directing reconsideration of service termination and terminal benefits.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 195-A IPC Section 506-B IPC Article 20(1) Constitution of India criminal intimidation

X v. State of Kerala & Another

15 Sep 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1243

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to facilitate amicable settlement by directing restitution of money and gold in a rape and cheating case while upholding the principle that serious offences require investigation and custodial interrogation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 506 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Neelkanth Realty Private Limited & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 1255
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary limitation issue decided on demurrer in arbitration does not foreclose re-examination on evidence and that an arbitral award deciding limitation without evidence violates fundamental policy of Indian law, justifying judicial interference.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant demurrer limitation arbitration Section 34 Arbitration Act

Assistant General Manager State Bank of India & Anr. v. Tanya Energy Enterprises

15 Sep 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 1119
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with mandatory upfront payment under the OTS 2020 Scheme disentitles a borrower from having the application processed, setting aside the High Court's direction to consider such application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant One Time Settlement Scheme SARFAESI Act secured creditor upfront payment

The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025

15 Sep 2025 · B.R. GAVAI; AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH · 2025 INSC 1116
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, rejecting challenges that the amendments violated fundamental rights or legislative competence.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 Waqf by User Constitutional validity Articles 14, 15, 25, 26

ba3cb2fc0f71cba9dc21fe765b6fa931cf5c2f2b0be883f98e74ba62ad3578d5

15 Sep 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1117
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a re-trial is an exceptional remedy not justified merely by procedural lapses in recording video evidence or non-examination of the Chemical Examiner, and restored the appeals for fresh consideration by the High Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant re-trial video evidence Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Chemical Examiner

Paramjeet Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

15 Sep 2025 · B.V. Nagarathna; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1118
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 420 IPC for lack of fraudulent intention and abuse of process, emphasizing that breach of contract alone does not constitute cheating.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC cheating fraudulent intention Section 482 CrPC

Mamman Khan v. State of Haryana

12 Sep 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1113

The Supreme Court held that segregation of trial solely on the basis of the accused's status as a sitting MLA without legal justification violates statutory provisions and constitutional rights, mandating a joint trial with co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant segregation of trial joint trial separate trial Section 223 Cr.P.C.

ANNA WAMAN BHALERAO v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1114

The Supreme Court dismissed anticipatory bail appeals of revenue officials accused of certifying mutation entries based on forged documents, emphasizing the necessity of balancing personal liberty with investigation and directing expeditious disposal of bail applications.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC personal liberty delay in FIR

Confederation of Real Estate Developers Association of India v. Union of India & Others

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1112
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that General Conditions under the EIA 2006 Notification do not apply to building and construction projects, affirming State-level appraisal and setting aside the NGT order mandating central appraisal.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant Environmental Impact Assessment Notification 2006 General Conditions Building and Construction Projects Township and Area Development Projects

Vaneeta Patnaik v. Nirmal Kanti Chakrabarti & Ors.

12 Sep 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 1106

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a sexual harassment complaint as barred by the statutory limitation period, holding that subsequent administrative actions were not continuing sexual harassment under the POSH Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant sexual harassment POSH Act 2013 limitation period Local Complaint Committee

Mansi Brar Fernandes v. Shubha Sharma and Anr.

12 Sep 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 1110

The Supreme Court affirmed that speculative investors are not entitled to initiate insolvency proceedings under the IBC, clarified the applicability of the 2019 Ordinance, and emphasized protection of genuine homebuyers under the right to shelter.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 7 IBC financial creditor homebuyer

GEETA @ REETA MISHRA v. AJAY KUMAR MISHRA

12 Sep 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1102
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court affirmed the divorce decree on cruelty grounds and directed the husband to pay Rs.10 lakhs towards the daughter’s marriage expenses, emphasizing a father's continuing duty despite marital acrimony.

family appeal_dismissed Significant divorce cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

ITC LIMITED v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; R. MAHADEVAN · 2025 INSC 1111
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that search and seizure under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 must comply with Cr.P.C. safeguards including prior recording of reasons and presence of independent witnesses, and quashed the seizure conducted without such compliance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Legal Metrology Act, 2009 search and seizure Section 15 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

M.S. PATTER v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; R. MAHADEVAN · 2025 INSC 1115
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutional duty of the State to ensure humane conditions and rehabilitation in beggars’ homes under Article 21, directing accountability and systemic reforms following a cholera outbreak and deaths at a Delhi institution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 21 Beggars’ Homes Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 Public Interest Litigation

Prakash Asphaltings and Toll Highways (India) Limited v. Mandeepa Enterprises

12 Sep 2025 · Manoj Misra; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 1108

The Supreme Court held that post-bid rectification of financial bids altering the BOQ is impermissible and set aside the High Court's order allowing such correction, emphasizing sanctity of tender process and natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant tender process financial bid rectification Bill of Quantity (BOQ) judicial review

Unknown v. M/S RAHUL INDUSTRIES AND ORS

12 Sep 2025 · J.B. PARDIWALA; R. MAHADEVAN · 2025 INSC 1103
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the appellant lacked authority to impose a 20% price hike on coal for non-core linked consumers without following prescribed procedures, rendering the Interim Coal Policy arbitrary and violative of Article 14, and ordered refund of excess amounts collected.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Interim Coal Policy price fixation Article 14 Article 39(b)