Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Avtar Singh v. Bimla Devi

29 Sep 2021 · K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with concurrent findings of fact in a property possession dispute under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, restoring the lower courts' dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant concurrent findings of fact second appeal Section 41 Punjab Courts Act Section 100 CPC

Avtar Singh v. Bimla Devi

29 Sep 2021 · K. M. Joseph; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with concurrent findings of fact in a property dispute under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, restoring the trial courts' dismissal of the plaintiffs' suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 41 Punjab Courts Act second appeal concurrent findings of fact registered sale deed

Munusamy v. The Land Acquisition Officer

29 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna · 2021 INSC 572

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquisition should be based on comparable sale deeds with suitable deductions, partly allowing the appeal and enhancing compensation to Rs.1191 per cent of market value.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act compensation market value sale deed

Munusamy v. The Land Acquisition Officer

29 Sep 2021 · M. R. Shah; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquisition must consider bona fide sale deeds of small parcels with suitable deductions, partly allowing the appeal and enhancing the compensation awarded.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act compensation market value sale deed

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Somdutt Sharma

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2021 INSC 576
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Irrigation Department is not an industrial establishment under the ID Act, thus Chapter VB does not apply, validating the respondent's termination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Factories Act, 1948 industrial establishment manufacturing process

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Somdutt Sharma

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Irrigation Department is not an Industrial Establishment under the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus Chapter VB provisions do not apply, validating the termination of the respondent's employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Establishment Factories Act definition Manufacturing process Chapter VB Industrial Disputes Act

Union of India v. Trilok S. Bhandari

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2021 INSC 571

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order granting notional promotion and pension benefits to officers excluded from valid review selection committee recommendations, but protected pension rights of an officer who retired as a de facto IFS member under an interim order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Forest Service promotion clubbing of vacancies IFS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1966

Union of India v. Trilok S. Bhandari & Ors.

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order directing adjustment of officers promoted by clubbing vacancies against notional vacancies, holding unchallenged review committee recommendations final, but protected pensionary benefits of officers who retired as de facto IFS members under interim orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Forest Service Promotion by clubbing vacancies Review selection committee Notional vacancies

Suraz India Trust v. Union of India

29 Sep 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh

The Supreme Court held the petitioner guilty of contempt for persistently scandalising the judiciary through frivolous PILs and disparaging remarks, upheld exemplary costs and barred further filings, emphasizing the constitutional power to punish contempt and protect judicial dignity.

constitutional conviction_upheld Significant contempt of court scandalising the court public interest litigation exemplary costs

Suraz India Trust v. Union of India

29 Sep 2021 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; M. M. Sundresh
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that frivolous PILs and motivated attempts to scandalize the judiciary constitute contempt, upheld exemplary costs, and directed recovery while rejecting conditional apologies.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant contempt of court public interest litigation exemplary costs Article 129 Constitution

Rajasthan v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

29 Sep 2021 · L. Nageswara Rao; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that a Single Judge cannot issue blanket orders restricting bail applications or arrests during the COVID-19 lockdown, as such orders infringe on the Chief Justice's administrative powers and constitutional rights of accused persons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail applications administrative power Chief Justice COVID-19 pandemic

State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shaheena Masarat

29 Sep 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; SANJIV KHANNA · 2021 INSC 573

The Supreme Court held that the upper age limit for appointment under the Re-T scheme is mandatory, set aside the appointment of an overage candidate, upheld the appointment of the eligible candidate, and clarified that eligibility criteria for public posts must be strictly followed to ensure constitutional fairness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme upper age limit public appointment eligibility Articles 14 and 16

State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Shaheena Masarat

29 Sep 2021 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; SANJIV KHANNA

The Supreme Court held that the upper age limit for appointment under the Re-T scheme is mandatory, invalidated the appointment of an overage candidate, and upheld the appointment of the eligible candidate while setting aside the continuation of both in the same post.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme upper age limit mandatory eligibility criteria public employment

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v. R.C. SRIVASTAVA

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka · 2021 INSC 574

The Supreme Court held that an Industrial Tribunal cannot reappraise evidence or substitute findings of a fair domestic enquiry and allowed the employer's appeal upholding dismissal for misconduct.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 11-A standard of proof

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v. R.C. SRIVASTAVA

29 Sep 2021 · Ajay Rastogi; Abhay S. Oka
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court held that Industrial Tribunals cannot reappreciate evidence or apply criminal standards in domestic enquiries and upheld the dismissal of a workman for gross misconduct, setting aside the reinstatement order.

labor appeal_allowed Significant domestic enquiry industrial disputes act Section 11-A preponderance of probabilities

Vishwabandhu v. Sri Krishna

29 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that summons returned with refusal by registered post constitute valid service, and a party with knowledge of proceedings cannot set aside an ex parte decree after auction and sale certificate issuance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC service of summons registered post

ADANI GAS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

28 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld that deemed authorization under Section 16 of the PNGRB Act applies only to entities authorized by the Central Government before the appointed day, validating Regulation 18 and dismissing Adani’s challenge to the exclusion of disputed areas from its authorization.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant PNGRB Act Section 16 deemed authorization Regulation 18 CGD Regulations natural gas distribution

ADANI GAS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

28 Sep 2021 · Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Hrishikesh Roy

The Supreme Court upheld that deemed authorization under Section 16 of the PNGRB Act applies only to entities authorized by the Central Government before the appointed day, validating Regulation 18 and dismissing Adani's challenge to the exclusion of disputed areas from its authorization.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 Section 16 deemed authorization Regulation 18 CGD Regulations City or Local Natural Gas Distribution Network

EMPLOYEES’ STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. KAKINADA MUNICIPALITY

28 Sep 2021 · K. M. Joseph; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that factories run by local authorities are covered under the Employees’ State Insurance Act unless exempted by the appropriate Government, and the Insurance Court lacks jurisdiction to grant such exemption.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 1(4) Section 75(1)(g) Section 90 exemption

Khatema Fibres Ltd v. New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr

28 Sep 2021 · Hemant Gupta; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's settlement based on the surveyor's volumetric loss assessment, dismissing the appellant's consumer complaint for higher compensation and deficiency in service.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Insurance claim Surveyor's report Volumetric analysis Deficiency in service