Supreme Court of India
8,182 judgments
Citizens for Green Doon v. Union of India and Others
The Supreme Court held that permission for tree felling by the State authority under the Forest Conservation Act is appealable before the NGT, set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the environmental challenge, and granted interim stay on tree felling pending appeal.
Mohd. Mustafa v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the UPSC's selection of the Punjab DGP, affirming the validity of the Draft Guidelines and rejecting bias allegations, limiting judicial review in administrative selections.
The State of Haryana v. Shalimar Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of government notifications declaring controlled and urban areas, rejecting the challenge by a developer who failed to avail statutory remedies and whose claims of vested rights were premature.
The State of Haryana v. Shalimar Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld government notifications restricting development under the Controlled Areas and Urban Development Acts, emphasizing statutory compliance and rejecting challenges based on alleged premature colony development or lack of bonafides.
Shikha Jain v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition, holding that no error apparent on the record justified interference with the earlier order granting relief based on a settlement.
Shikha Jain v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition challenging relief granted based on a settlement, holding no apparent error justified interference.
Kiran Devi v. Ravindra Kumar Yadav
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record in the earlier order, while condoning the delay in filing the petition.
Kiran Devi v. Ravindra Kumar Yadav
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record while condoning the delay in its filing.
Raju Yadav v. Sarju Dusadh
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, holding that no error apparent on record justified interference despite condoning the delay.
Raju Yadav v. Sarju Dusadh
The Supreme Court condoned delay but dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record, affirming the concurrent findings of the lower courts.
Vimla Devi v. Chhabiram
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition and Special Leave Petition, affirming the High Court's restoration of the Trial Court's judgment for lack of any error apparent on record.
Vimla Devi v. Chhabiram
The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition for lack of any error apparent on record while condoning the delay in its filing, thereby affirming the High Court's decision restoring the Trial Court's order.
The Chairman, State Bank of India and Another v. M.J. James
The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a bank employee for misconduct, ruling that denial of representation by a union outside the defined bank employees' union did not violate natural justice, and delay in challenging dismissal barred relief.
Kurvan Ansari urfe Kurvan Ali and Others v. Shyam Kishor Murmu and Others
The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for the death of a non-earning child in a motor accident by increasing the notional income to reflect current economic conditions, directing the insurance company to pay Rs. 4,70,000 with interest.
Navneet Kaur v. Prabhjeet Singh Channa
The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of a Transfer Petition after parties settled their dispute amicably and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Navneet Kaur v. Prabhjeet Singh Channa
The Supreme Court allowed withdrawal of a Transfer Petition following an amicable settlement between the parties and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd v. M/s Ramesh Kumar and Company
The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by reappraising evidence and setting aside a reasoned arbitral award, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Punjab State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd v. M/s Ramesh Kumar and Company
The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside a reasoned arbitral award and decreeing the claim, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Welspun Specialty Solutions Limited v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld an arbitral award holding that time was not the essence of the contract, liquidated damages were waived, and damages must be based on actual loss, limiting court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Welspun Specialty Solutions Limited v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral award holding that time was not the essence of the contract and liquidated damages could not be imposed after waiver, limiting court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act to cases of patent illegality or violation of public policy.