Supreme Court of India
8,182 judgments
Ayodhya Faizabad Development Authority and Anr. v. Ram Newaj and others
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken or compensation is tendered, even if compensation is deposited in the Treasury and not the Court.
S.P. Velumani v. Arappor Iyakkam
The Supreme Court held that the accused is entitled to the preliminary enquiry report prior to framing of charges when the FIR arises from judicial proceedings and the State reverses its earlier closure, ensuring the right to a fair trial.
Deepak Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a murder accused, emphasizing the necessity of judicial discretion and reasoned orders in bail matters involving serious offences.
Deepak Yadav v. State of U.P. & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail order for a murder accused, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial discretion and consideration of all relevant factors before granting bail.
Shri M.L. Patil v. The State of Goa
The Supreme Court held that pension arrears must be paid from the correct retirement age despite delay, while denying back wages for wrongful premature retirement.
Shri M.L. Patil v. The State of Goa
The Supreme Court held that employees wrongfully retired before the prescribed retirement age are entitled to pension arrears from the correct retirement age, though delay may justify denial of back wages.
Faizabad Vikas Pratishthan v. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey; Muradabad Vikas Pratishthan v. Babu; Muradabad Vikas Pratishthan v. Horam Singh; Muradabad Vikas Pratishthan v. Malka Begum
The Supreme Court held that where no award under Section 11 of the 1894 Land Acquisition Act was made before 01.01.2014, the 2013 Land Acquisition Act applies mandatorily for compensation, and interim court orders restraining acquisition do not bar this application.
Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority v. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey
The Supreme Court held that landowners who obtained interim court stays preventing award declaration under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot claim compensation under the 2013 Act, as such delays exclude them from its benefits.
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited v. Emta Coal Limited
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision restraining recovery based on a disputed CAG report and dismissed the appellant's appeal in a contractual coal procurement dispute.
State Bank of India & Anr. v. K.S. Vishwanath
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence and interfering with the dismissal of a bank officer proven guilty of fraud in departmental enquiry, restoring the dismissal order.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Raj Kumar
The Supreme Court overruled the broad principle in Y.V. Rangaiah that vacancies arising before amendment must be filled under old rules, holding that recruitment and promotion are governed by the rules in force at the time of consideration, consistent with constitutional provisions on public service.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Raj Kumar
The Supreme Court overruled the principle that vacancies arising before amendment of service rules must be filled under old rules, holding that recruitment and promotion are governed by the rules in force at the time of consideration, consistent with the constitutional status of public service.
Agra Vikas Prati Karan v. Anek Singh & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act cannot be invalidated solely for non-payment of compensation if possession was taken and clarified the application of limitation under Section 24(2), overruling earlier precedent relied upon by the High Court.
Agra Development Authority v. Anek Singh and others
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken or compensation tendered, overruling earlier contrary precedent.
Agra Vikas Prati Karan v. Anek Singh & Ors.
The Supreme Court clarified that acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act do not lapse merely due to non-payment of compensation for some land portions, setting aside the High Court's invalidation of acquisition on this ground.
Agra Development Authority v. Anek Singh and others
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken or compensation tendered, overruling earlier precedent relied upon by the High Court.
Union of India & Ors. v. Anil Prasad
The Supreme Court held that on re-employment in government service, retired Armed Forces personnel are entitled to pay fixation with advance increments on the civil post scale capped by last drawn pay, but not pay protection at last drawn pay under Para 8 of the CCS Order, 1986.
Union of India & Ors. v. Anil Prasad
The Supreme Court held that on reappointment in government service, pay fixation for retired Armed Forces personnel must be computed as per Para 8 of the CCS Order, 1986, and does not guarantee pay fixation at par with last drawn pay in the Armed Forces.
Sabitri Samantaray v. State of Odisha
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for culpable homicide under Section 304(II) IPC, affirming that once prosecution establishes a prima facie case, the burden shifts to accused under Section 106 Evidence Act to explain the incident.
M/s Knit Pro International v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that offence under Section 63 of the Copyright Act is cognizable and non-bailable, setting aside the High Court's order quashing the FIR and criminal proceedings.