Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Sudhir Vilas Kalel v. Bapu Rajaram Kalel

07 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 90
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that failure to produce the Validity Certificate within the prescribed time results in automatic disqualification, and the Temporary Extension Act, 2023 does not protect candidates whose applications were rejected, thereby validating the No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Validity Certificate Caste Certificate Temporary Extension Act, 2023 Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act

Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Another

07 Feb 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 92
Cites 0 · Cited by 28

The Supreme Court upheld the denial of bail to an accused under stringent provisions of the UAP Act, holding that prima facie evidence of involvement in terrorist activities justifies continued custody during trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail under UAP Act Section 43D(5) UAP Act prima facie true terrorist activities

Kishore & Ors. v. State of Punjab

07 Feb 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 91

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants of murder and related charges due to absence of unlawful assembly, unreliable eyewitness identification, and doubtful recovery evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proving specific roles beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC test identification parade eyewitness identification

Saraswathi v. S.A. Palanisamy

07 Feb 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 153

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal by setting aside prior judgments and decrees based on a valid settlement agreement between the parties and directed decree drawing accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Settlement Agreement Civil Appeal Setting aside judgment No Objection Certificate

Union of India and Others v. Shishu Pal @ Shiv Pal

07 Feb 2024 · Hima Kohli; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 550

The Supreme Court upheld termination of a CRPF constable for deliberately concealing pending criminal cases in his verification form, emphasizing the higher integrity standards required in uniformed services.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant suppression of material facts verification roll departmental inquiry termination of service

Jagmohan and Another v. Badri Nath and Others

06 Feb 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 86
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld tenants' right of pre-emption over urban immovable property despite a State notification excluding pre-emption rights for sale of land within municipalities, and held the suit was within limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant right of pre-emption Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 urban immovable property State Government notification

Velthepu Srinivas and Others v. State of Andhra Pradesh

06 Feb 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha · 2024 INSC 87

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of three accused but modified the conviction of the fourth accused to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, sentencing him to 10 years imprisonment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC common intention murder

Ram Singh v. State of U.P.

05 Feb 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 128

The Supreme Court set aside the appellant's murder conviction due to inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony, non-recovery of weapon, absence of ballistic evidence, and acquittal of co-accused on the same evidence, granting the appellant benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt ballistic expert weapon recovery eyewitness credibility

Bhaggi @ Bhagirath @ Naran v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Feb 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 82
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court modified the life sentence under Section 376 AB IPC for rape of a minor to 30 years rigorous imprisonment with fine, confirming conviction but adjusting the punishment for appropriate deterrence and rehabilitation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 AB IPC rape of minor capital punishment commutation life imprisonment

Abduljabbar v. The State of Haryana & Ors.

05 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 99
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant’s sentence to the period already served due to a thirteen-year trial delay while upholding the conviction under Sections 323 and 325 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sentence modification prolonged trial delay Section 323 IPC Section 325 IPC

Rajasekar v. The State

05 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 96

The Supreme Court confirmed the appellant's conviction under the POCSO Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served, granting partial relief on the quantum of punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 3(a) Section 4 quantum of sentence

Mamidi Anil Kumar Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

05 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 101
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings reopened after a compromise in a matrimonial dispute due to vague allegations and abuse of process, emphasizing careful scrutiny under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC compromise quashing of criminal proceedings Section 498A IPC

Haalesh @ Haleshi Kurubara v. State of Karnataka

02 Feb 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of appellants as members of an unlawful assembly under Section 149 IPC based on reliable ocular evidence and dismissed their appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object

Vinod Kanjibhai Bhagora v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

02 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 100
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that prior Central Government service must be counted as qualifying service for pension under Rule 25(ix) of the Gujarat Pension Rules if the employee is absorbed by the State Government, allowing the appellant's appeal and directing recalculation of pension benefits.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pensionary benefits qualifying service absorption Central Government service

The Authorised Officer, Central Bank of India v. Shanmugavelu

02 Feb 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 80
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that forfeiture of earnest money under SARFAESI Rules must be limited to actual loss suffered and cannot result in unjust enrichment of the secured creditor.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act earnest money deposit forfeiture Section 73 Indian Contract Act

Sushil Kumar Pandey & Ors. v. The High Court of Jharkhand & Anr.

01 Feb 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 97
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that the Jharkhand High Court's post-examination imposition of a 50% aggregate qualifying mark for District Judge appointments was arbitrary and ultra vires, directing adherence to the original recruitment rules and merit list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Judicial service recruitment Selection criteria Midway change of rules Legitimate expectation

Dattatraya v. State of Maharashtra

01 Feb 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 167
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, recognizing the act as committed in a sudden fight without premeditation, and ordered his release after considering his incarceration period.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

Haryana Staff Selection Commission v. Subhash Chand

31 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 112
Cites 0 · Cited by 39

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing appointment of a candidate under the EBPGC reserved category due to administrative failure to modify recruitment processes following judicial restraint on SBC reservations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation SBC category EBPGC category recruitment advertisement

Government of Goa v. Maria Julieta D’Souza & Ors.

31 Jan 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 88
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the plaintiff had established title by preponderance of probabilities and dismissed the Government's appeal challenging the burden and standard of proof.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant declaration of title burden of proof standard of proof possession

Bharat Sher Singh Kalsia v. State of Bihar & Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 77

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against a bona fide purchaser under a valid Power of Attorney, holding the dispute to be civil and outside the territorial jurisdiction of the prosecuting court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney Sale Deed Territorial Jurisdiction Quashing of FIR