Supreme Court of India

15,089 judgments

Year:

Thankamma George v. Lilly Thomas and Another

09 Jul 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 494

The Supreme Court held that the principal's execution of a sale deed impliedly revoked the agent's power of attorney, rendering a subsequent unauthorized sale deed void, and allowed the appeal restoring the Trial Court's decree for partition and possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney Implied Revocation Agency Sale Deed

Ratnu Yadav v. The State of Chhattisgarh

09 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 487

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to lack of reliable corroboration of extra-judicial confession and insufficient evidence proving homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant extra-judicial confession Section 302 IPC hostile witness corroboration

Vinod Jaswantray Vyas v. State of Gujarat

09 Jul 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 490

The Supreme Court acquitted police officers accused of custodial death, holding that medical evidence contradicted eyewitness testimony and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant custodial death eyewitness credibility medical evidence vs ocular testimony delay in complaint

Ram @ Ramdas Sheshrao Neharkar v. Sheshrao Baburao Neharkar

09 Jul 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 498
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in a partition suit, holding that the appellant failed to prove marriage and parentage, justifying the High Court's reversal of concurrent findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit burden of proof matrimonial relations parentage

State of Punjab v. Randhir Singh

09 Jul 2024 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 489
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable dying declarations and insufficient prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC appeal against acquittal burn injuries

Elfit Arabia & Anr v. Concept Hotel BARONS Limited & Ors

09 Jul 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 536
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator holding the claim was ex facie barred by limitation and criminal proceedings under Section 138 NI Act do not extend limitation for arbitration.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration limitation Section 11(6) Arbitration Act Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Naseem Kahnam and Others v. Zaheda Begum by LR. and Others

09 Jul 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 492

The Supreme Court upheld a family settlement agreement partitioning property among Mohammedan heirs, including a niece, emphasizing enforceability despite non-registration and favoring family harmony.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement partition suit Mohammedan law succession validity of agreement

SHASHIDHAR v. ASHWINI UMA MATHAD

08 Jul 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 485
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court modified the partition decree by excluding certain self-acquired properties from ancestral coparcenary partition, confirming shares of parties in other properties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit ancestral property self-acquired property coparcenary

Shiv Pratap Singh Rana v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 481

The Supreme Court quashed rape and criminal intimidation proceedings against the appellant, holding the relationship was consensual and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient material to proceed to trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent rape Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

X v. Y

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 476

The Supreme Court upheld divorce on the ground of desertion due to non-compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and conditioned its operation on payment of Rs. 30 lakhs as lump sum alimony.

family appeal_allowed Significant restitution of conjugal rights desertion divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Thatireddigari Maheswara Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 495

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable eyewitness testimony of the deceased's relatives corroborated by material evidence, dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Eyewitness testimony Interested witnesses Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC

Vishwanatha v. State of Karnataka

08 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 482

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to doubts over his identification in the absence of a Test Identification Parade and inconsistencies between eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Test Identification Parade Identification evidence Strangulation Homicide

R. RADHAKRISHNA PRASAD v. SWAMINATHAN & ANR.

08 Jul 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 463
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reduction of refundable advance consideration to Rs. 3,00,000/- due to lack of proof for additional payments in a suit for specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement of sale advance payment proof of payment

Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Private Limited v. Samir Narain Bhojwani

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 478
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appellate courts under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act may remand matters only in exceptional cases, set aside the High Court's remand order, and directed fresh hearing on merits to uphold arbitration's objectives of efficiency and minimal court interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Section 37 appeal remand power

Sardar Ravi Inder Singh v. State of Jharkhand

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 472

The Supreme Court quashed a criminal complaint as an abuse of process where the plaintiff had settled and withdrawn the suit for specific performance, renouncing all claims over the property.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abuse of process quashing of complaint settlement withdrawal of suit

Mahesh Chand Bareth v. State of Rajasthan

08 Jul 2024 · Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 466

The Supreme Court upheld age relaxation and bonus marks granted to candidates with experience in government educational projects in recruitment to the post of Prabodhak, finding no violation of Article 14 or the Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant age relaxation bonus marks educational projects Article 14

The State of West Bengal v. Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Ltd.

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 477

The Supreme Court held that a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act filed after the limitation period expired before court closure is barred, and Section 4 of the Limitation Act does not apply to extend the limitation in such cases.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Limitation Act, 1963 Section 4 Limitation Act

Har Narayan Tewari v. Cantonment Board, Ramgarh

08 Jul 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 467

The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff-appellant's suit for title and possession over disputed land was not barred by res judicata and restored the trial court's decree in his favor.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata Section 11 CPC title suit possession

The Excise Commissioner Karnataka & Anr. v. Mysore Sales International Ltd. & Ors.

08 Jul 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 484
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that excise contractors who obtain retail vending rights by auction are not "buyers" under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, and Mysore Sales is not liable to collect TDS, also mandating notice and hearing before passing orders under Section 206C(6).

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 206C Income Tax Act Tax Deducted at Source Buyer definition Excise contractors

The State of Punjab v. Partap Singh Verka

08 Jul 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 483
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that prior sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act is mandatory before summoning a public servant under Section 319 CrPC, and without such sanction, the summons are invalid.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 19 sanction Section 319 CrPC prior sanction mandatory