Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Abduljabbar v. The State of Haryana & Ors.

05 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 99
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court reduced the appellant’s sentence to the period already served due to a thirteen-year trial delay while upholding the conviction under Sections 323 and 325 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sentence modification prolonged trial delay Section 323 IPC Section 325 IPC

Rajasekar v. The State

05 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 96

The Supreme Court confirmed the appellant's conviction under the POCSO Act but reduced the sentence to the period already served, granting partial relief on the quantum of punishment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 3(a) Section 4 quantum of sentence

Mamidi Anil Kumar Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh

05 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 101
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings reopened after a compromise in a matrimonial dispute due to vague allegations and abuse of process, emphasizing careful scrutiny under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC compromise quashing of criminal proceedings Section 498A IPC

Haalesh @ Haleshi Kurubara v. State of Karnataka

02 Feb 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Pankaj Mithal

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of appellants as members of an unlawful assembly under Section 149 IPC based on reliable ocular evidence and dismissed their appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly common object

Vinod Kanjibhai Bhagora v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

02 Feb 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 100
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that prior Central Government service must be counted as qualifying service for pension under Rule 25(ix) of the Gujarat Pension Rules if the employee is absorbed by the State Government, allowing the appellant's appeal and directing recalculation of pension benefits.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pensionary benefits qualifying service absorption Central Government service

The Authorised Officer, Central Bank of India v. Shanmugavelu

02 Feb 2024 · Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud; J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 80
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court held that forfeiture of earnest money under SARFAESI Rules must be limited to actual loss suffered and cannot result in unjust enrichment of the secured creditor.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act earnest money deposit forfeiture Section 73 Indian Contract Act

Sushil Kumar Pandey & Ors. v. The High Court of Jharkhand & Anr.

01 Feb 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 97
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that the Jharkhand High Court's post-examination imposition of a 50% aggregate qualifying mark for District Judge appointments was arbitrary and ultra vires, directing adherence to the original recruitment rules and merit list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Judicial service recruitment Selection criteria Midway change of rules Legitimate expectation

Dattatraya v. State of Maharashtra

01 Feb 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 167
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court converted the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, recognizing the act as committed in a sudden fight without premeditation, and ordered his release after considering his incarceration period.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC

Haryana Staff Selection Commission v. Subhash Chand

31 Jan 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 112
Cites 0 · Cited by 39

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing appointment of a candidate under the EBPGC reserved category due to administrative failure to modify recruitment processes following judicial restraint on SBC reservations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation SBC category EBPGC category recruitment advertisement

Government of Goa v. Maria Julieta D’Souza & Ors.

31 Jan 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 88
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the plaintiff had established title by preponderance of probabilities and dismissed the Government's appeal challenging the burden and standard of proof.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant declaration of title burden of proof standard of proof possession

Bharat Sher Singh Kalsia v. State of Bihar & Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 77

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against a bona fide purchaser under a valid Power of Attorney, holding the dispute to be civil and outside the territorial jurisdiction of the prosecuting court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Power of Attorney Sale Deed Territorial Jurisdiction Quashing of FIR

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

31 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Prashant Kumar Mis... · 2024 INSC 78
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court institutionalised the Central Empowered Committee as a permanent statutory body under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, laying down principles for effective environmental governance and rule of law.

constitutional other Significant Central Empowered Committee Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 environmental governance environmental rule of law

Patil v. Vinod Dodhu Chaudhary

30 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 75

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings following complainants' withdrawal and compensation but imposed costs on police personnel for illegal detention and demolition to ensure accountability.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC Section 202 CrPC illegal detention coercion

Amit Kumar Das v. Shrimati Hutheesingh Tagore Charitable Trust

30 Jan 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 73
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot vacate a stay order in contempt proceedings and remanded the matter for proper contempt adjudication, clarifying the limits of contempt jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contempt jurisdiction Article 215 Constitution Contempt of Courts Act 1971 stay order

Vithal v. The State of Karnataka

30 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 79

The Supreme Court granted leave to examine whether joint liability under section 34 IPC requires uniform conviction and sentencing for all accused, highlighting the need to consider individual roles in a criminal act.

criminal other Significant Section 34 IPC Joint liability Differential sentencing Section 302 IPC

Baitulla Ismail Shaikh and Anr. v. Khatija Ismail Panhalkar and Ors.

30 Jan 2024 · Aniruddha Bose; Bela M. Trivedi · 2024 INSC 71

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's setting aside of eviction decrees for non-compliance with statutory requirements under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, emphasizing the necessity of court satisfaction on bona fide need and immediacy of demolition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 eviction bona fide requirement demolition notice

Safiya Bano Alias Shakira and Others v. The State of U.P.

30 Jan 2024 · B. R. Gavai; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 166

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against the husband's relatives due to lack of specific allegations under Section 498-A IPC and upheld the power of courts to prevent abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR dowry harassment

Veena Gupta v. Central Pollution Control Board

30 Jan 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 89

The Supreme Court set aside ex parte orders of the National Green Tribunal for lack of notice and hearing, emphasizing adherence to natural justice in environmental proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal ex parte order natural justice notice

Vinod Kumar v. Union of India

30 Jan 2024 · Vikram Nath; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 332

The Supreme Court held that employees appointed temporarily but serving continuously for over 25 years with substantive duties and proper selection are entitled to regularization, overruling the rigid application of Uma Devi principles.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization temporary employment continuous service Accounts Clerk

SACHIN GARG v. STATE OF U.P & ANR.

30 Jan 2024 · ANIRUDDHA BOSE; SANJAY KUMAR · 2024 INSC 72
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant, holding that a commercial dispute over payment does not constitute criminal breach of trust or criminal intimidation under IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal breach of trust Section 405 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 504 IPC