Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

GLAS Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran

23 Oct 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 811

The Supreme Court upheld NCLAT’s approval of a settlement under its inherent powers before CoC formation, clarifying the interplay between Rule 11 and Section 12A of the IBC and affirming the limited locus of non-settling creditors.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Settlement approval Rule 11 NCLAT Rules

State of U.P. v. M/S Lalta Prasad Vaish and sons

23 Oct 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2024 INSC 812

The Supreme Court affirmed that 'intoxicating liquor' under Entry 8 of List II includes only potable alcohol, confirming the Union's exclusive control over industrial alcohol under Entry 52 of List I and the IDRA, limiting State powers to regulatory measures and fees.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant intoxicating liquor industrial alcohol potable alcohol legislative competence

Manish Kumar Rai v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 815
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the pay disparity between Artificers I-III and Chief Petty Officers in the Indian Navy, ruling that rank equivalence for seniority does not mandate identical grade pay absent command and promotional parity.

civil appeal_dismissed Artificer pay scale 6th Central Pay Commission grade pay parity Indian Navy ranks

VIDYASAGAR PRASAD v. UCO BANK

22 Oct 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2024 INSC 810
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, holding that statutory balance sheet entries and a One Time Settlement proposal constitute valid acknowledgment of debt extending the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act as applied to IBC proceedings.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Section 7 IBC Limitation Act Section 18 Acknowledgment of debt Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

HDFC BANK LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

22 Oct 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 807

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against HDFC Bank and its officials for alleged violation of Income Tax Act restraining orders, holding that the FIR did not disclose prima facie offences under the IPC and continuation of proceedings would cause undue hardship.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR mens rea Income Tax Act restraining order

Uma & Anr. v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police

22 Oct 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 809

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, medical proof of homicidal death, and failure to explain circumstances under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 106 Indian Evidence Act homicide medical evidence

V. D. RAVEESHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

22 Oct 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 1060

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for criminal breach of trust and cheating where the accused forged documents to sell a hypothecated vehicle without repaying the loan, clarifying the distinction and coexistence of offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal breach of trust cheating forgery loan repayment

Shyam Narayan Ram v. State of U.P. & Anr.

21 Oct 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 800

The Supreme Court held that admitted prosecution documents under Section 294 CrPC need not be formally proved and set aside the High Court's remand order, directing the appeals to be decided on merits based on trial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 294 CrPC admission of documents formal proof fair trial

Lenin Kumar Ray v. M/s. Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd.

21 Oct 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 802
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an employee drawing salary above the pre-2010 threshold and performing supervisory duties does not qualify as a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, thereby validating his termination without reinstatement or back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 workman definition supervisory employee termination of service

Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Abhishek Gupta

21 Oct 2024 · Surya Kant; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 796
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of land acquisition by Haryana Urban Development Authority, clarifying mandatory compliance under Section 5A, rejecting discrimination claims, and disallowing arbitrary release of land during pendency of acquisition.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 5A Article 14 Doctrine of merger

Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

21 Oct 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 798

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of Section 498-A IPC charges due to absence of specific evidence linking him to cruelty, emphasizing caution against over-implication in dowry harassment cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498-A IPC dowry harassment over-implication specific evidence

Central Warehousing Corporation & Anr v. M/S Sidhartha Tiles & Sanitary Pvt. Ltd

21 Oct 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 805
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Public Premises Act does not override the Arbitration Act and upheld the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator to resolve lease-related disputes under a valid arbitration clause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Public Premises Act Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 11 arbitration clause

Bijay Agarwal v. M/s Medilines

21 Oct 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 918
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an authorized signatory of a company is not the 'drawer' of a cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act and cannot be directed to deposit compensation under Section 148, setting aside the condition imposed by the appellate court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI Act Section 143A NI Act Section 148 NI Act

K.C.KAUSHIK AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

21 Oct 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 803

The Supreme Court held that retired teachers of government aided colleges are not entitled to interest on belated payment of revised pension absent statutory provision or written government instructions, dismissing their appeals against the High Court’s denial of interest.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant revised pension interest on delayed payment Haryana Civil Services Rules 2009 government aided colleges

S. P. PANDEY v. UNION OF INDIA

21 Oct 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2024 INSC 804

The Supreme Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's setting aside of a disproportionate disciplinary admonition against an Air Force personnel and awarded compensation for wrongful and vindictive treatment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Armed Forces Tribunal disciplinary proceedings admonition vindictiveness

Salil R. Uchil v. Vishu Kumar & Ors.

18 Oct 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 793

The Supreme Court held that an auction purchaser deprived of the use of deposited auction money due to setting aside of auction on equitable grounds is entitled to interest on the amount from deposit till refund, modifying the High Court's compensation order.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant auction sale compensation interest on deposited amount equitable relief

Society for Enlightenment and Voluntary Action & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Oct 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J B Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 790

The Supreme Court directed enhanced enforcement of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, emphasizing the appointment of dedicated officers and comprehensive measures to eradicate child marriage in India in line with constitutional and international obligations.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant child marriage Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 Child Marriage Prohibition Officer maintenance and custody

Union of India v. M/s Ganpati Dealcom Pvt Ltd

18 Oct 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj... · 2024 INSC 799

The Supreme Court allowed the review petition recalling its earlier judgment on the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, restoring the appeal for fresh consideration of constitutional validity issues in the absence of a proper lis.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 constitutional validity Article 20(1) of Constitution

Asim Akhtar v. State of West Bengal

18 Oct 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 794

The Supreme Court held that while Section 319 CrPC applications can be decided on examination-in-chief evidence, the Trial Court has discretion to wait for cross-examination, and acquittal due to prosecution witnesses' non-appearance for cross-examination was rightly upheld.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC examination-in-chief cross-examination Section 232 CrPC

Union of India v. Pranav Srinivasan

18 Oct 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 792
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a person born abroad to parents who ceased Indian citizenship by acquiring foreign nationality before birth is not entitled to resume Indian citizenship under Section 8(2) or Section 5(1)(b) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and Article 8 of the Constitution does not apply to such a person.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Indian citizenship Citizenship Act 1955 Section 8(2) Section 5(1)(b)