High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Shahbaz Mumtaz Khan v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

02 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe; M. S. Karnik

The Bombay High Court struck down an IOCL tender clause preferring younger candidates in tie-breaks as arbitrary and violative of Article 14, allowing the petitioner’s constitutional challenge despite prior participation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Article 14 discrimination age-based classification tender conditions

Smt. Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women’s University Law School v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

02 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the Bar Council of India's power under the Advocates Act, 1961 to inspect law colleges affiliated to universities and validated the Rules of Legal Education-2008 and related inspection notices.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Bar Council of India Advocates Act 1961 legal education inspection power

Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund v. Neelkanth Realty Private Ltd. & Ors.

02 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld modification of an interim arbitral award to allow examination of limitation issue on evidence, holding that deciding limitation solely on demurrer without evidence violates fundamental policy of Indian law.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Limitation

Shree P. A. Parekh; Shree M. Chattarji v. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board

02 Apr 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav

The Bombay High Court quashed convictions under the Water Pollution Act due to procedural lapses in sample collection, vague sanction orders, and lack of specific allegations against company officers.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 Section 21 sample collection procedure sanction for prosecution environmental law

Makarand Vijay Pujari v. The State of Maharashtra

02 Apr 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner was ineligible for appointment due to lack of requisite graduation degree at the time of application and for making a false statement in the application form.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant eligibility qualification graduation degree false statement application form

Ramugade Sahaniwas No.2 Sahkari Gruharachna Dekhbhal Sanstha Maryadit v. Anand K. Aalshi & Ors.

02 Apr 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the lawful change of classification of a cooperative society to a maintenance society, quashed the cryptic order setting aside the change, and invalidated elections allowing defaulters to vote, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory procedural requirements.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 change of classification maintenance society tenant ownership housing society

Sagar Bhagirath Karate v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

02 Apr 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld IOCL’s rejection of dealership applications for failure to submit mandatory registered lease deeds, holding that such non-compliance justified rejection and did not violate natural justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Retail Outlet dealership Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. registered lease deed eligibility criteria

Abhijeet Appasaheb Bacche-Patil & Ors. v. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that a Bar Association is not a State under Article 12 and dismissed a writ petition challenging election eligibility rules, directing petitioners to seek civil remedies.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India Bar Association State Instrumentality

Ambit Urbanspace v. Poddar Apartment Co-operative Housing Society Limited & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Section 9 petition seeking eviction of statutory tenants not party to the arbitration agreement, holding that tenancy protections under the Rent Act cannot be circumvented through arbitration interim relief.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Maharashtra Rent Control Act statutory tenants interim protective measures

Krupa Zubin & Anr. v. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the registration of a co-operative housing society under MOFA, holding that contractual clauses compelling membership in a dissolved promoter company are void and do not bar purchasers from forming a new society.

property petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Section 4(1A)(v) Section 10 MOFA co-operative housing society

Manekben Rama Tandel v. The Collector Daman

01 Apr 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; M.M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging land acquisition for public infrastructure, holding that due process under the Land Acquisition Act was followed and Section 10 protection did not apply.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 10 protection legitimate expectation

Vivekanand Sudhir Pise v. State of Maharashtra

28 Mar 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to two accused after over 13 years of pre-trial incarceration, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 despite the gravity of the offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail speedy trial Article 21 long incarceration

M/s. Hare Krishna Enterprises v. The City Industrial and Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited

28 Mar 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld CIDCO's discretion to reject the highest bid on commercial grounds, dismissing the petitioner's claim to vested rights in plot allotment and emphasizing public interest over private claims.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant highest bidder public auction promissory estoppel commercial discretion

Sanjeev Dnyandeo Bhor and others v. State of Maharashtra and others

28 Mar 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; Rajesh S. Patil
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court quashed the Tribunal's seniority order for being barred by limitation without condonation of delay and granted opportunity to seek condonation before reconsideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority limitation condonation of delay Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Hitesh Tukaram Ade v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited

28 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a candidate not included in the wait list cannot claim appointment after its expiry, affirming the finality of published recruitment lists and rejecting the petitioner's claim.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant wait list select list appointment recruitment rules

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Mrs. Dolly Satish Gandhi

28 Mar 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; Milind N. Jadhav; Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court Full Bench held that amounts received under Mediclaim policies are not deductible from statutory compensation awarded for medical expenses under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Mediclaim Policy Medical Insurance Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Ulhas Dandekar v. Sushil Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

27 Mar 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The High Court upheld an arbitral award holding a client liable for stock market trades despite absence of prior written authorization, emphasizing that such authorization is a procedural safeguard and liability depends on overall evidence of participation.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration stock broker prior authorization SEBI Circular

Rashmi Vijay Rijhwani v. Nisha Purshotam Mirani

27 Mar 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that a summary suit for recovery of debt requires a written contract and granted unconditional leave to defend where a triable issue exists, setting aside the condition of deposit imposed by the trial court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary suit Order 37 CPC written contract acknowledgment of debt

Dr. Shobha Bhargava v. The State of Maharashtra

27 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that unilateral cancellation of condonation of breaks in service without hearing violates natural justice and restored continuous service benefits and old pension scheme entitlement to the petitioner.

service petition_allowed Significant condonation of breaks in service natural justice audi alteram partem old pension scheme

Ashok Kakasaheb Chaugule v. State of Maharashtra

27 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that 50% of the petitioner's part-time teaching service can be added to his full-time service for pension calculation, entitling him to the Old Pension Scheme benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant part-time service full-time service pension eligibility Old Pension Scheme