High Court of Bombay

4,240 judgments

Year:

Abhijeet Appasaheb Bacche-Patil & Ors. v. The Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court held that a Bar Association is not a State under Article 12 and dismissed a writ petition challenging election eligibility rules, directing petitioners to seek civil remedies.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 12 Constitution of India Article 226 Constitution of India Bar Association State Instrumentality

Ambit Urbanspace v. Poddar Apartment Co-operative Housing Society Limited & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Section 9 petition seeking eviction of statutory tenants not party to the arbitration agreement, holding that tenancy protections under the Rent Act cannot be circumvented through arbitration interim relief.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Maharashtra Rent Control Act statutory tenants interim protective measures

Krupa Zubin & Anr. v. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the registration of a co-operative housing society under MOFA, holding that contractual clauses compelling membership in a dissolved promoter company are void and do not bar purchasers from forming a new society.

property petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Section 4(1A)(v) Section 10 MOFA co-operative housing society

Manekben Rama Tandel v. The Collector Daman

01 Apr 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; M.M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging land acquisition for public infrastructure, holding that due process under the Land Acquisition Act was followed and Section 10 protection did not apply.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Section 10 protection legitimate expectation

Vivekanand Sudhir Pise v. State of Maharashtra

28 Mar 2025 · Milind N. Jadhav
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court granted bail to two accused after over 13 years of pre-trial incarceration, emphasizing the right to speedy trial under Article 21 despite the gravity of the offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail speedy trial Article 21 long incarceration

M/s. Hare Krishna Enterprises v. The City Industrial and Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited

28 Mar 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld CIDCO's discretion to reject the highest bid on commercial grounds, dismissing the petitioner's claim to vested rights in plot allotment and emphasizing public interest over private claims.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant highest bidder public auction promissory estoppel commercial discretion

Sanjeev Dnyandeo Bhor and others v. State of Maharashtra and others

28 Mar 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; Rajesh S. Patil
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court quashed the Tribunal's seniority order for being barred by limitation without condonation of delay and granted opportunity to seek condonation before reconsideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority limitation condonation of delay Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Hitesh Tukaram Ade v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited

28 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a candidate not included in the wait list cannot claim appointment after its expiry, affirming the finality of published recruitment lists and rejecting the petitioner's claim.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant wait list select list appointment recruitment rules

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Mrs. Dolly Satish Gandhi

28 Mar 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; Milind N. Jadhav; Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court Full Bench held that amounts received under Mediclaim policies are not deductible from statutory compensation awarded for medical expenses under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Mediclaim Policy Medical Insurance Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Ulhas Dandekar v. Sushil Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

27 Mar 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN

The High Court upheld an arbitral award holding a client liable for stock market trades despite absence of prior written authorization, emphasizing that such authorization is a procedural safeguard and liability depends on overall evidence of participation.

commercial appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration stock broker prior authorization SEBI Circular

Rashmi Vijay Rijhwani v. Nisha Purshotam Mirani

27 Mar 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that a summary suit for recovery of debt requires a written contract and granted unconditional leave to defend where a triable issue exists, setting aside the condition of deposit imposed by the trial court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary suit Order 37 CPC written contract acknowledgment of debt

Dr. Shobha Bhargava v. The State of Maharashtra

27 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that unilateral cancellation of condonation of breaks in service without hearing violates natural justice and restored continuous service benefits and old pension scheme entitlement to the petitioner.

service petition_allowed Significant condonation of breaks in service natural justice audi alteram partem old pension scheme

Ashok Kakasaheb Chaugule v. State of Maharashtra

27 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that 50% of the petitioner's part-time teaching service can be added to his full-time service for pension calculation, entitling him to the Old Pension Scheme benefits.

administrative petition_allowed Significant part-time service full-time service pension eligibility Old Pension Scheme

Satyawan Ananta Padwale v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

27 Mar 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court held that special provisions for Scheduled Areas under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act override general disqualification rules, quashing the disqualification of a Scheduled Tribe Sarpanch for failure to convene Gram Sabha meetings.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Areas Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Chapter III-A Section 7 disqualification

Abdulkadir Lokhandwala & Anr. v. Central Adoption Resource Agency & Ors.

27 Mar 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Dr. Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court held that the Juvenile Justice Act and Adoption Regulations do not apply to adoption of a foreign citizen child not in need of care or protection, and CARA rightly refused approval without compliance with foreign adoption laws.

family petition_dismissed Significant Juvenile Justice Act 2015 Adoption Regulations in-country adoption inter-country adoption

Morries Energies Limited v. Sumit Agarwal

26 Mar 2025 · S. M. Modak

The High Court granted leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused director Anubhav Agarwal for dishonour of cheques under the Negotiable Instruments Act, while refusing leave against accused Sumit Agarwal due to insufficient evidence of vicarious liability.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Section 142

Lok Housing & Construction Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

26 Mar 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the deemed conveyance order under MOFA, ruling that a promoter’s statutory obligation to convey title to a cooperative housing society is time-bound and cannot be deferred by contractual conditions or incomplete construction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act deemed conveyance promoter obligation cooperative housing society

Sachin Dhondiram Chavan v. Trupti Sachin Chavan

26 Mar 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The High Court upheld the Family Court's rejection of the husband's application to withdraw consent for divorce by mutual consent after the wife acted to her detriment on the consent terms, emphasizing estoppel and preventing malafide withdrawal.

family appeal_dismissed Significant divorce by mutual consent Section 13-B Hindu Marriage Act withdrawal of consent estoppel

Central Depositories Services (India) Limited v. Ketan Lalit Shah

25 Mar 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Neela Gokhale
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that an Arbitral Tribunal can permit withdrawal of claims with liberty to file fresh claims and refused to interfere under Article 226 absent perversity or bad faith.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Tribunal Withdrawal of claim Liberty to file fresh claim Section 19(3) Arbitration Act

Munawwar Sultana Mirza Naeem Baig & Ors. v. Mumbai Building Repair & Reconstruction Board & Ors.

25 Mar 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition by tenants seeking redevelopment notice under Section 79-A of the MHADA Act as premature since the statutory timelines for owners to redevelop had not expired.

administrative petition_dismissed Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 Section 79-A writ petition prematurity