High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Sou Deepa Chandrashekar Shetty and Rajshree Prasad Shetty v. Milind Jaykumar Kole

08 Apr 2025 · N.J. Jamadar

The High Court held that a suit for specific performance without a fixed performance date cannot be summarily rejected on limitation grounds without trial when refusal of performance is not clearly pleaded, and permitted pre-trial amendment of the plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance limitation Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC amendment of plaint

Shabana Rashid Pinjari v. Maharashtra Public Service Commission

08 Apr 2025 · M.S. Karnik; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court allowed a visually impaired candidate to correct her appointing authority preference post-submission, emphasizing reasonable accommodation under the RPwD Act and rejecting rigid procedural bars.

administrative petition_allowed Significant reasonable accommodation Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 visual impairment appointing authority preference

Kisanlal Bairudas Jain v. Union of India and Ors.

08 Apr 2025 · M.S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court allowed writ petitions directing NHAI to pay statutory solatium and interest benefits as per Supreme Court precedent, holding that alternate remedies under the Arbitration Act were ineffective for such relief.

administrative petition_allowed Significant solatium interest land acquisition arbitral award

Commission on Ecumenical Mission & Relations of the Presbyterian Church (USA) v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

07 Apr 2025 · Amit Borkar

The Bombay High Court upheld the rejection of a Public Trust's belated application for extension of time to execute a sale deed under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, emphasizing strict adherence to time limits and the necessity of transparent procedures to protect Trust interests.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 Section 36 Charity Commissioner extension of time

Anna Maruti Shinde v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Apr 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Neela Gokhale
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court held that police must mandatorily register an FIR and conduct a fair investigation into the custodial death of Akshay Shinde, directing constitution of a Special Investigating Team to ensure compliance with constitutional and procedural safeguards.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant FIR registration cognizable offence custodial death fake encounter

Dattu @ Datta Bhika Tongare v. The State of Maharashtra

07 Apr 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Dr. Neela Gokhale

The High Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to failure of the prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing that failure to explain under Section 106 Evidence Act cannot substitute for such proof.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act last seen evidence

Paritosh Manmohan Khanvilkar v. Union of India

05 Apr 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Advait M. Sethna

The Bombay High Court invoked the doctrine of parens patriae under Article 226 to appoint the daughter as legal guardian of her mother suffering from severe dementia, enabling her to manage the mother's person and property.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant parens patriae legal guardian dementia cognitive impairment

Raj Transport and Trading Company v. Barge Madhwa and another

04 Apr 2025 · Abhay Ahuja

The Bombay High Court allowed a decree on admission for maritime claims against a vessel's sale proceeds, holding that admiralty jurisdiction and insolvency proceedings operate independently and the plaintiff's maritime lien claim is enforceable despite liquidation of the vessel's owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Admiralty jurisdiction maritime lien Order XII Rule 6 CPC decree on admission

Vilas Laxman Chawan v. State of Maharashtra

04 Apr 2025 · Revati Mohite Dere; Dr. Neela Gokhale
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for abduction and rape of a minor, holding that the victim's reliable testimony and corroborative medical and DNA evidence suffice for conviction without corroboration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sexual offence minor victim victim testimony DNA evidence

Ikhlaq Bashir Shaikh v. Radhika Rastogi

04 Apr 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court quashed a detention order under the PITNDPS Act due to unreasonable and unexplained delay that broke the live link between grounds of detention and the purpose of detention.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Detention Order Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Delay in detention Subjective satisfaction

M/s. Mehta & Co. v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

04 Apr 2025 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court held that the Municipal Corporation's demolition of a plaintiff's structure without due process was illegal and granted interim relief directing temporary alternate accommodation pending permanent rehabilitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant demolition mandatory injunction redevelopment scheme municipal corporation

Mehta Jaising Construction v. Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax

03 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J

The Bombay High Court upheld the finding that a private trust constituted an Association of Persons, dismissing the appeal against disallowance of interest payments under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Association of Persons Income Tax Act 1961 Section 40(b) Section 260A

Mehta Jaising Combine v. Addl. Commissioner of Income-Tax

03 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J

The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of a private trust as an Association of Persons, dismissing the appeal against disallowance of interest payments under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Association of Persons Income Tax Act 1961 Section 40(b) Private Specific Trust

Mehta Jaising Combine v. The Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax

03 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.

The Bombay High Court upheld the finding that a private trust pooling funds for business purposes constitutes an Association of Persons, justifying disallowance of interest payments under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Association of Persons Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 40(b) Private Specific Trust

Mehta Jaising Construction v. The Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax

03 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J

The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of a private trust as an Association of Persons, dismissing the appeal against disallowance of interest payments under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Association of Persons Private Specific Trust Income Tax Act 1961 Section 40(b)

Mehta Jaising Combine v. Income Tax Officer Ward-27(8) Mumbai

03 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J

The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of a private trust as an Association of Persons and dismissed the appeal against disallowance of interest payments under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Association of Persons Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 40(b) Section 260A

Vimalnath Shelters Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra

03 Apr 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court invalidated redevelopment notices issued without statutory declaration of the building as dangerous and proper procedure, protecting owners’ rights against arbitrary actions under Section 79-A of the MHADA Act.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 79-A MHADA Act dangerous building competent authority Section 354 BMC Act

Mehta Jaising Construction v. Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax

03 Apr 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J

The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of a Private Specific Trust as an Association of Persons and affirmed the disallowance of interest payments to beneficiaries under Section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Association of Persons Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 40(b) Section 260A

Dr. Balaji Ashok Bhise v. The State of Maharashtra

03 Apr 2025 · A. S. Chandurkar; M. M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging PG medical admission, holding that the petitioner was ineligible for MD Medicine due to prior diploma and lower merit, and that admission rules and merit-based criteria must be strictly followed.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant PG Medical Admission NEET-PG EWS Certificate In-service Quota

Neetu Makhija v. Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation & Ors.

03 Apr 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Kamal Khata

The Bombay High Court directed immediate demolition of unauthorized construction by the municipal corporation, holding that illegal constructions without prior permission cannot be regularized and emphasizing statutory duties of authorities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant illegal construction demolition municipal corporation regularization