High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Arshad Karar Khan v. State of Maharashtra

20 Mar 2025 · Amit Borkar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Bail was denied to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to non-fulfillment of mandatory conditions under Section 37, with the Court upholding the validity of seizure and Chemical Analyzer’s report despite minor procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS commercial quantity bail

Aurum Avenue Co-op Housing Society Ltd. v. The State of Maharashtra

19 Mar 2025 · Amit Borkar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that cancellation of a cooperative society's registration under Section 21A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act requires clear proof of fraud and cannot be based on procedural irregularities or minority purchasers' objections.

civil petition_allowed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Section 21A deregistration fraud

The Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation v. Antony Waste Handling Cell Pvt. Ltd

18 Mar 2025 · SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

The Bombay High Court dismissed NMMC's challenge to an arbitral award upholding contract terms on jurisdiction, price escalation, mixed waste rates, and interest, affirming the award's validity under the Arbitration Act.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Wholesale Price Index Price escalation

Ramesh Hanamant Savalatot v. State of Maharashtra

18 Mar 2025 · Rajesh S. Patil

The Bombay High Court rejected anticipatory bail for an accused in a serious counterfeit currency case, holding that absence of custodial interrogation necessity alone does not justify bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail custodial interrogation counterfeit currency prima facie case

Pandurang Rajaram Inamdar v. Accelya Solution India Private Ltd.

18 Mar 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

A plaintiff's right to abandon part of a claim under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC is not unfettered at the appellate stage after a decree, especially if such abandonment prejudices the defendant or nullifies vested rights.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC abandonment of suit withdrawal of claim appellate stage

Navnit Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, (Appeals-III), Mumbai & Anr.

18 Mar 2025 · M. S. Sonak; Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that Input Tax Credit can be used for the 10% pre-deposit under Section 107(6) CGST Act, and set aside the dismissal of the petitioner's appeal for non-compliance without notice, directing the appeal to be decided on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Pre-deposit Section 107(6) CGST Act Natural Justice

Pinak Bharat & Co. v. Anil Ramrao Naik

17 Mar 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; M. S. Karnik, J.

The Bombay High Court held that in a Court-monitored public auction, the sale price confirmed by the Court is the true market value for stamp duty, and the Collector of Stamps cannot override this valuation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Court-monitored public auction Market value Stamp duty Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958

Nitesh Raghunath Lahange v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

17 Mar 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court dismissed bail in a serious gang rape case, holding that the right to speedy trial must be balanced against the gravity of the offence and risk of witness tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail gang rape Section 376(D) IPC speedy trial

Jade Fernandes & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & Ors.

15 Mar 2025 · M.S. Sonak; Kamal Khata
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court directed MHADA and BMC to issue occupancy approvals to tenants despite developer defaults, ordered reconciliation of municipal dues, and mandated inquiries into official lapses causing public loss.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Occupation Certificate No Objection Certificate Developer default Municipal Corporation

Pushpa v. High Court of Judicature of Bombay

13 Mar 2025 · Alok Aradhe, CJ; Bharati Dangre, J · 2017 SCC Online Bom 9686
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that resignation by a High Court Judge constitutes retirement under the 1954 Act, entitling the Judge to pension benefits.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 retirement resignation pension entitlement

Rajani Rajan Dixit v. State of Maharashtra

13 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that a part-time teacher in a Night Junior College is not entitled to pension benefits under the applicable laws and dismissed the petition seeking such benefits.

labor petition_dismissed Significant part-time teacher pension entitlement Night Junior College Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act

Vaishali Kashinath Thorat v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

13 Mar 2025 · Bharati Dangre; Ashwin D. Bhobe
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court upheld the MPSC's selection of candidates for Assistant Commissioner posts, ruling that Sub Engineer posts qualify as responsible posts and probationary training counts towards required experience, dismissing challenges to the recruitment process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Assistant Commissioner recruitment Maharashtra Public Service Commission Sub Engineer eligibility responsible post definition

Smt. Gauri Sadanand Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

13 Mar 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that TET qualification cannot be retrospectively imposed on compassionate appointments made before its introduction, directing approval of the petitioner’s appointment and payment of arrears with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant compassionate appointment TET qualification retrospective application approval of appointment

Annappa Maruti Zalke v. Ramu Balappa Bogarnal

13 Mar 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The High Court held that an unregistered Agreement for Sale can be admitted as evidence in a suit for specific performance and restored the trial court's injunction protecting the petitioner's possession against the respondent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement for Sale Temporary Injunction Unregistered Document Indian Registration Act 1908

Ramprabhu Gopinath Kapse v. Shevantabai Baburao Kapse

13 Mar 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The High Court upheld the correction of a decree under Section 152 CPC to rectify a clerical error in property description without altering substantive relief, dismissing the writ petition challenging the amendment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 152 CPC amendment of decree clerical mistake accidental slip

M/s. PVP Star Hotels Private Limited v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

13 Mar 2025 · A.S. Gadkari; Shyam C. Chandak

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition directing restoration of possession and extension of time to complete hotel construction subject to payment of additional lease premium and furnishing Bank Guarantee, holding that the Respondents acted arbitrarily and failed to fairly exercise discretion in terminating the lease.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant extension of time additional lease premium termination of lease principles of natural justice

Arjun Raju Khanapure v. Union of India

13 Mar 2025 · Alok Aradhe; Bharati Dangre

The Bombay High Court upheld the legality of mandatory FASTag usage and double toll fees for non-FASTag users, dismissing the PIL challenging the policy as neither arbitrary nor violative of fundamental rights.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant FASTag National Highways Fee Rules 2008 double toll fee digital payment

Ramadas KS v. Tata Institute of Social Sciences

12 Mar 2025 · A.S. Chandurkar; M.M. Sathaye

The Bombay High Court upheld a two-year suspension of a Ph.D. student for unauthorized use of the institute’s name in politically motivated protests, holding the disciplinary action lawful, proportionate, and compliant with natural justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant student suspension Code of Conduct honour code political protest

Kanchan Bajrang Powar; Nitin Bajrang Powar; Vipin Bajrang Powar; Shilpa Bajrang Pawar v. Aappa Dagdu Powar (deceased) through LRs; Bebi Appa Powar; Gajanan Appa Powar; Amar Appa Powar; Swati Lakhan Vadar; Valubai Dagdu Pawar; Raju Bhimrav Chikhalikar; Gan

12 Mar 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that secondary evidence of an insufficiently stamped partition deed is inadmissible, dismissing the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to permit such evidence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant secondary evidence partition deed insufficient stamp duty admissibility of evidence

Dev Kumar Agarwal v. Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

12 Mar 2025 · Sarang V. Kotwal; S. M. Modak

The Bombay High Court quashed a long-pending criminal prosecution for customs offences due to gross inordinate delay violating the accused's fundamental right to speedy trial under Article 21.

criminal petition_allowed Significant right to speedy trial Article 21 inordinate delay quashing of prosecution