High Court of Bombay

5,131 judgments

Year:

Surya Education Society v. Girija Pandey

24 Nov 2025 · G. S. Kulkarni; Aarti Sathe

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal, holding that a temporary appointee without a formal appointment letter who abandoned service cannot claim permanent status, reinstatement, or back wages under the MEPS Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Act permanent vacancy temporary appointment abandonment of service

Arbaz Aslam Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra

21 Nov 2025 · Neela Gokhale
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court dismissed bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, holding that delayed compliance with Section 42 is permissible during patrolling and that the recovery of commercial quantity narcotics negates reasonable grounds for bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 bail conditions Section 42 compliance Section 50 notice

Aidem Ventures Pvt. Ltd. v. Darshan Pitale

21 Nov 2025 · Manish Pitale

The Bombay High Court held that gratuity cannot be forfeited under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act for acts of moral turpitude committed after cessation of employment and without prior notice.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4(6)(b)(ii) forfeiture of gratuity moral turpitude

Gurudatta Infrastructures v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ; Gautam A. Ankhand, J

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a tender bid for non-compliance with a technical requirement, holding that judicial interference in tender awards is limited to cases of mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender process technical bid rejection Geo-tagging report

C 4 Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Nashik Division

21 Nov 2025 · Shree Chandrashekhar, CJ; Gautam A. Ankhand, J

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a technical bid for non-submission of a mandatory Geo-tagging certificate, holding that judicial interference in tender matters is limited to cases of mala fide or arbitrariness.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant judicial review government tender technical bid rejection Geo-tagging certificate

Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra

21 Nov 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale

The Bombay High Court dismissed bail for a drunken driver accused of causing death by rash driving, emphasizing the seriousness of the offence and risk of evidence tampering.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail rash and negligent driving intoxication Section 105 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

The State of Maharashtra v. Maruti Bhikaji Borkar & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Dr. Neela Gokhale · 2024 INSC 899
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside the acquittal of two public servants for demand and acceptance of bribe, holding that the prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the alibi plea was not established.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 bribery demand and acceptance of bribe appeal against acquittal

Sulakshana Raju Dhar v. Anna Dadu Bansode & Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court held that an election petition disclosing sufficient material facts and proper verification cannot be rejected at the threshold and warrants a trial.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant election petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 material facts Order VII Rule 11 CPC

Mehul Jagdish Trivedi v. Manisha Mehul Trivedi

20 Nov 2025 · Jitendra Jain

The Bombay High Court held that a maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is not a 'debt' under the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and dismissed the petition seeking insolvency declaration to avoid maintenance liability.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance order insolvency petition

Uday Dalal; Ajay Biyani; Rina Pritish Nandy v. Divisional Joint Registrar

19 Nov 2025 · N. J. Jamadar
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Bombay High Court held that admission of members to a cooperative society must be decided by the society itself under statutory provisions, quashing an order that bypassed this process and directing the society to decide on membership applications lawfully.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 membership admission deemed membership tenant vs member

Naseer Babasaheb Jahagirdar v. John Wilson Education Society

18 Nov 2025 · Sharmila U. Deshmukh

The Bombay High Court set aside the termination of a college professor due to invalid appointment of the Inquiry Officer by an unauthorized body, emphasizing that only the Governing Body recognized by the University can appoint such officer under the Maharashtra Universities Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Inquiry Officer appointment Governing Body definition University of Mumbai Statutes Maharashtra Universities Act 1994

Shri Bhairavnath Trymbak Kadlag v. The Employees Provident Fund Organization

18 Nov 2025 · N. J. Jamadar

The Bombay High Court held that a lessee of an establishment leased by a secured creditor is jointly liable for provident fund dues under Section 17-B of the EPF Act but recovery orders under Section 8-F must follow due procedure including notice and opportunity to be heard.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act Section 17-B liability Section 8-F procedure secured creditor

Buildcon Sethia Construction v. Dipti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd

17 Nov 2025 · Gauri Godse

The Bombay High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected for non-compliance with Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act if it discloses urgent interim relief contemplated from the plaintiff's standpoint.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Order VII Rule 11 CPC urgent interim relief pre-institution mediation

The Bandra Holy Family Hospital Society v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · A. S. Gadkari; Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Court held that a son’s neglect and abandonment of his ailing mother violates statutory duties under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, directing protective measures for the senior citizen’s welfare and property preservation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Abandonment of senior citizen Right to health Article 21 Constitution of India

M/s. Everhome Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Aditya Developers and Ors.

17 Nov 2025 · MILIND N. JADHAV

The court held that failure to comply with conditions precedent by the Long Stop Date in a Term Sheet results in automatic termination, rendering the Term Sheet unenforceable and limiting the aggrieved party to refund of deposits.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Term Sheet Long Stop Date Validity Clause Joint Development Agreement

Sugamma v. Kshtriya Dnyati Sabha

17 Nov 2025 · Madhav J. Jamdar

The Bombay High Court upheld a decree passed under Order XVII Rule 2 CPC despite non-appearance of defendants, held the Bombay Amendment restricting service to male family members invalid, and dismissed the writ petition challenging service and decree under Article 227 jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XVII Rule 2 CPC ex parte decree service of summons Bombay Amendment Order 5 Rule 15

Onkar Niloba Gaikwad v. State Government Education Department

17 Nov 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court directed the Maharashtra State Board to issue the petitioner’s improved 2016 HSC examination marks memo and certificate, holding that procedural errors by the college and the Board’s failure to provide result options should not prejudice the student’s academic rights.

education petition_allowed Significant Class Improvement Scheme Higher Secondary Certificate examination form error marks memo issuance

Sayyad Shabbir Ahmed Ibrahim v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

14 Nov 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that retrospective cancellation of promotion and recovery of excess salary without prior notice and hearing violates natural justice and set aside the recovery order, directing the Corporation to follow due process.

administrative petition_allowed Significant writ of mandamus promotion cancellation natural justice recovery of excess salary

Shilpa S. Chandankar v. N.T.C. Ltd.

14 Nov 2025 · Ravindra V. Ghuge; Ashwin D. Bhobe

The Bombay High Court held that fixing retirement age at 60 years for female employees while allowing males to continue till 63 years is discriminatory, entitling female employees reclassified as clerks to equal extension of service and benefits up to 63 years.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Standing Order 11A gender discrimination retirement age extension of service

Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. v. M/s. SRC Company Infra Private Ltd.

14 Nov 2025 · R.I. Chagla
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Bombay High Court set aside an arbitral award imposing royalty payment liability contrary to clear contract terms, holding that an arbitral tribunal cannot rewrite contracts or rely on internal uncommunicated documents to alter parties' obligations.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Royalty Payment Contract Interpretation Section 34 Arbitration Act