Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Union of India & Ors. v. JWO G Sasmal (Retd)

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10312-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless rebutted, and limited its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Bharat Singh Tomar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10414

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute on the basis of a genuine settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers of High Court Section 528 BNSS

M/S ARJUN ENGINEERING CO. v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, NORTH DELHI

20 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10280-DB

The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing a GST appeal due to inadequate hearing notice and counsel illness, setting aside dismissal and directing hearing on merits subject to costs.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay principles of natural justice CGST Act 2017 appeal dismissal

Sahil Padma Shinde v. Union of India and Ors

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10305-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification for Indian Coast Guard recruitment, holding that concurrence between medical examinations suffices and distinct medical standards for paramilitary forces are valid.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness axial length paramilitary recruitment Detailed Medical Examination

Union of India & Ors. v. IC 65809 LT COL Sandeep Kumar

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10295-DB

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the respondent’s promotion excluding arbitrary Value Judgment marks and allowing age waiver, ensuring fair assessment under established policy and law.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Value Judgment marks Promotion Selection Board Age waiver

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Hav Sanjay Kumar Singh

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to legal errors only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Hari Ram Gujar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10291-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions for seniority refixation due to non-impleadment of necessary parties, reaffirming the settled Supreme Court mandate that all affected parties must be impleaded.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority refixation impleadment necessary parties service law

M/S. Jagat Singh Gurcharan Singh v. Saurabh Arora

20 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10339
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenant on bona fide requirement grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenant’s challenge and belated documents.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Alok Kumar Agarhari v. IIFT & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:10298

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a contractual employee, holding that termination in accordance with contract terms without proof of regularization was lawful.

employment petition_dismissed contractual employment termination of service regularization unauthorized absence

Aienaddin Gurgij v. Customs Through Air Customs Officer

20 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:10240
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a commercial quantity heroin case, holding that the statutory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met despite prolonged custody and trial delay.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 37 NDPS Act commercial quantity bail heroin

Imran Khan v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:10243
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused caught with commercial quantity heroin, holding that statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act applies and procedural irregularities do not vitiate prosecution at bail stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 commercial quantity bail

Nadeem Ahmad v. Commissioner of Customs

20 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10277-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court ordered release of a detained gold bar due to non-issuance of mandatory Show Cause Notice within statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act, relying on Supreme Court precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 110 Show Cause Notice Seized goods

Surender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1964
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to stay ICC disciplinary proceedings on sexual harassment allegations, except directing change of the Presenting Officer due to conflict of interest, holding that interlocutory relief is not warranted absent jurisdictional defects or non-misconduct.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Internal Complaints Committee sexual harassment disciplinary proceedings interlocutory relief

M/S WIRETEL SOLUTION PVT.LTD v. M/S ANNU INFRA CONSTRUCT INDIA PVT. LTD.

20 Nov 2025 · ANIL KSHETARPAL; HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR · 2025:DHC:10311-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of unilateral arbitrator appointment objection, directing the Single Judge to decide the Section 34 petition on merits without influence from interim observations.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 unilateral appointment arbitrator jurisdiction

Sanjay Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10323-DB

The Delhi High Court held that uncommunicated adverse ACRs cannot be considered in promotion decisions and directed a review DSC ignoring such ACRs, setting aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioner's claim.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report Departmental Screening Committee Non-Functional Upgradation Uncommunicated adverse remarks

SI Shivam, PS Seelam Pur v. Shreepal

20 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's probation order for a convict under Section 397 IPC, affirming that probation can be granted despite mandatory minimum sentences absent a non obstante clause.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 397 IPC mandatory minimum sentence probation order

Mr. Naresh & Anr. v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10416

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS matrimonial dispute

Amish Bajaj & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10415

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS inherent powers of High Court matrimonial dispute

Nishit Jain and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

20 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10418

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers of High Court Section 528 BNSS

Sanjay Khurana v. Income Tax Department Ministry of Finance

20 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10242-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging rejection of condonation of nine-month delay in filing revised Income Tax Return, holding that no sufficient cause or genuine hardship was shown under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax petition_dismissed Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act condonation of delay revised Income Tax Return genuine hardship