Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Rajender Kumar Sharma v. Shree Bhairon Ji Mandir Samiti Regd

21 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10290

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing the plaintiff to file additional documents after impleadment of a new defendant, finding them relevant and the delay justified.

civil petition_dismissed Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC additional documents relevance of documents delay in filing documents

Vikram Chopra v. State & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10235-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed probate of a duly executed Will, holding that the testator was of sound mind and the alleged suspicious circumstances were unsubstantiated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will Probate Testamentary capacity Undue influence

Rohit Khatri v. Food Corporation of India & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:10271
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a petitioner appointed under OBC reservation based on an invalid State List certificate, affirming that only Central List OBC certificates are valid for Central Government posts and estoppel does not apply to illegal appointments.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant OBC reservation Central List of OBC State List of OBC illegal appointment

Amita Kumari v. Food Corporation of India

21 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan
Cites 1 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court held that only OBC communities listed in the Central List are eligible for reservation in Central Government posts, and appointments based on State List certificates are illegal and subject to lawful termination without estoppel.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant OBC reservation Central List of OBC State List of OBC illegal appointment

Rachna Mehndiratta v. Girdhari Lal

21 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha, J. · 2025:DHC:10274
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction preserving the status quo over disputed property during pendency of consolidated suits, affirming that fresh causes of action permit separate suits notwithstanding earlier pending litigation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interlocutory injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Section 10 CPC family settlement

Sunrise Sports (India) Private Limited v. White Owl Sports Private Limited

21 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10273
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the trial court in Delhi has territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit for recovery where part of the cause of action arose in Delhi under Section 20 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC cause of action business place

M/S OM FIRE SAFETY COMPANY PVT LTD v. UMAKANT

21 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10289

The Delhi High Court upheld the commercial court’s order taking the petitioner’s delayed Written Statement off record due to non-payment of costs, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines in commercial disputes.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Written Statement non-payment of costs Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Section 35B CPC

Piare Khan v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:10296
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that eviction of legal heirs under the Senior Citizen Act does not require proof of ill-treatment where they have no right or interest in the property, setting aside an appellate order that had quashed an eviction directed by the District Magistrate.

family petition_allowed Significant Senior Citizen Act 2007 eviction ill-treatment maintenance

Harsh Sehgal & Ors. v. Rajinder Pal Khanna & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10320

Delhi High Court granted conditional stay of arbitral award rejecting lease extension claims due to violation of natural justice and procedural irregularities, pending challenge under Section 34 Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award natural justice Section 18 Arbitration Act limitation

Anil Nagpal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

21 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10288

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 427 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 279 IPC Section 427 IPC Section 482 CrPC

M/S. Gautam Gambhir Foundation v. State of NCT of Delhi

21 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10319
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a charitable trust for free distribution of COVID-19 medicines, holding that non-commercial distribution under medical supervision is exempt from licensing under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 18(c) Section 19(3) Schedule K exemption

Jasir Bilal Wani @ Danish v. National Investigation Agency

21 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:10321

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking immediate legal consultation in custody, directing the Sessions Court to decide the application for legal mulaqat after verifying the pairokar’s identity, emphasizing exhaustion of remedies before approaching the High Court.

criminal petition_dismissed legal mulaqat right to counsel Article 22 Constitution exhaustion of remedies

Ram Rattan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

21 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10324
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of medical and forensic corroboration, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony material contradictions medical evidence

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Deepali Sharma & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of rash and negligent driving by the truck driver, rejected contributory negligence of the deceased, and enhanced compensation in line with Supreme Court precedents, modifying the award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence loss of consortium loss of love and affection

Sanjeev Krishan Sharma v. Punjab National Bank & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Kshetarpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10225-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking consolidation of recovery applications and stay of insolvency proceedings, holding that statutory remedies before DRT and NCLT must be exhausted and judicial interference under Articles 226 and 227 is unwarranted absent exceptional circumstances.

civil petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Articles 226 and 227 Debts Recovery Tribunal National Company Law Tribunal

Sunny Sangwan v. Saurabh Shandilya & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10230-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the closure of the defendant's right to file a belated Written Statement without condonation of delay, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and rejecting inconsistent factual claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Written Statement condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Delhi High Court Original Side Rules

Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Assotech Limited in Liquidation & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10228-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that courts cannot restrain prosecution following a statutory investigation under the Companies Act, 2013, and set aside an order that interdicted the SFIO from prosecuting the ex-management of a company in liquidation.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Serious Fraud Investigation Office investigation prosecution

Krishan Kumar & Anr. v. M/s Shakuntla Agency Pvt Ltd and Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2632
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award and dismissed the appeal, holding that judicial interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act is limited and parties cannot rely on documents not produced during arbitration to challenge the award post facto.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Arbitral award

Tarun Arora v. Commissioner of Customs

21 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10330-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that pre-printed waivers of Show Cause Notice are invalid and allowed the petitioner to challenge the confiscation order despite delay, emphasizing mandatory issuance of Show Cause Notice within statutory period under the Customs Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice pre-printed waiver absolute confiscation

Visage Beauty and Healthcare Private Limited v. Freecia Professional India Private Limited & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · CS(COMM) 633/2022

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks and copyright in product packaging and literary work, while holding that descriptive use of 'SHINE & GLOWING' does not constitute infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement copyright infringement interim injunction product packaging