Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Harsh Sehgal & Ors. v. Rajinder Pal Khanna & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10320

Delhi High Court granted conditional stay of arbitral award rejecting lease extension claims due to violation of natural justice and procedural irregularities, pending challenge under Section 34 Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award natural justice Section 18 Arbitration Act limitation

Anil Nagpal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

21 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10288

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 427 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve the ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 279 IPC Section 427 IPC Section 482 CrPC

M/S. Gautam Gambhir Foundation v. State of NCT of Delhi

21 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10319
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a charitable trust for free distribution of COVID-19 medicines, holding that non-commercial distribution under medical supervision is exempt from licensing under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Section 18(c) Section 19(3) Schedule K exemption

Jasir Bilal Wani @ Danish v. National Investigation Agency

21 Nov 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:10321

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking immediate legal consultation in custody, directing the Sessions Court to decide the application for legal mulaqat after verifying the pairokar’s identity, emphasizing exhaustion of remedies before approaching the High Court.

criminal petition_dismissed legal mulaqat right to counsel Article 22 Constitution exhaustion of remedies

Ram Rattan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

21 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10324
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of medical and forensic corroboration, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony material contradictions medical evidence

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Deepali Sharma & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of rash and negligent driving by the truck driver, rejected contributory negligence of the deceased, and enhanced compensation in line with Supreme Court precedents, modifying the award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence loss of consortium loss of love and affection

Sanjeev Krishan Sharma v. Punjab National Bank & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Kshetarpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10225-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking consolidation of recovery applications and stay of insolvency proceedings, holding that statutory remedies before DRT and NCLT must be exhausted and judicial interference under Articles 226 and 227 is unwarranted absent exceptional circumstances.

civil petition_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Articles 226 and 227 Debts Recovery Tribunal National Company Law Tribunal

Sunny Sangwan v. Saurabh Shandilya & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10230-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the closure of the defendant's right to file a belated Written Statement without condonation of delay, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and rejecting inconsistent factual claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Written Statement condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Delhi High Court Original Side Rules

Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Assotech Limited in Liquidation & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10228-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that courts cannot restrain prosecution following a statutory investigation under the Companies Act, 2013, and set aside an order that interdicted the SFIO from prosecuting the ex-management of a company in liquidation.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Serious Fraud Investigation Office investigation prosecution

Krishan Kumar & Anr. v. M/s Shakuntla Agency Pvt Ltd and Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2632
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award and dismissed the appeal, holding that judicial interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act is limited and parties cannot rely on documents not produced during arbitration to challenge the award post facto.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Arbitral award

Tarun Arora v. Commissioner of Customs

21 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10330-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that pre-printed waivers of Show Cause Notice are invalid and allowed the petitioner to challenge the confiscation order despite delay, emphasizing mandatory issuance of Show Cause Notice within statutory period under the Customs Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice pre-printed waiver absolute confiscation

Visage Beauty and Healthcare Private Limited v. Freecia Professional India Private Limited & Anr.

21 Nov 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · CS(COMM) 633/2022

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks and copyright in product packaging and literary work, while holding that descriptive use of 'SHINE & GLOWING' does not constitute infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement copyright infringement interim injunction product packaging

Bharat Bhushan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10303-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to decide on issuing a vending certificate to a visually disabled petitioner following survey participation, maintaining interim protections for his vending activity.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act, 2014 Certificate of Vending Town Vending Committee disability rights

M/S GLOBUS AGROFOODS PVT. LTD v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10332-DB

Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders for lack of fair hearing and remanded for fresh adjudication, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A of CGST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Personal Hearing

Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement v. Amlendu Pandey

21 Nov 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:10302-DB

The High Court held that search and seizure under Section 17 of PMLA do not require a complaint specifically against the person searched and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after setting aside the Appellate Tribunal's order de-freezing the respondent's property.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act Section 17 PMLA search and seizure attachment confirmation

Inder Dev Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2-Delhi

21 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10268-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that both the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and Faceless Assessing Officer have concurrent jurisdiction to issue reassessment notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing petitions challenging JAO's jurisdiction.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Faceless Assessing Officer Section 151A Income Tax Act

Prema Kumari v. Union of India and Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11031-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant’s lien cannot be terminated without employer’s timely action and opportunity, quashing the CISF’s refusal to revert a petitioner who was not confirmed in another department due to maternity leave.

administrative petition_allowed Significant lien reversion technical resignation Central Industrial Security Force

Vinayak International Housewares Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court held Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules unconstitutional and, following its omission effective 8th October 2024, quashed all pending proceedings under it, allowing exporters to claim IGST refunds without restrictions imposed by the rule.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Rule 96(10) CGST Rules IGST refund constitutional validity omission of rule

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Anant Ram

20 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10488

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's acquittal of the accused in a rash and negligent driving case due to material contradictions in the sole eyewitness testimony and emphasized the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal eyewitness testimony contradictions in evidence rash and negligent driving

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex MC Era II Navin Kumar

20 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that diseases arising during service are attributable to military service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction