Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sgt Mritunjay and Sgt Manish Kumar Singh v. Ex MWO Mohammad Yusuf Khan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless conclusively disproved by the employer.
Mritunjay and Manish Kumar Singh v. Ramesh Chandra Yadav
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex IIFL Jasbir Singh Panesar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.
Oswal Chemicals and Fertilizer v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the fixation of fertilizer retention price and debt-equity ratio by the expert committee, limiting judicial review and dismissing the appellant's challenge to the pricing methodology and subsidy calculations.
Gautam Naug v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner’s grievance was resolved by intervening circumstances, without adjudicating on the merits.
Naresh Bansal and Ors. v. Adjudicating Authority and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging provisional attachment orders under the PMLA, holding that the Directorate had valid reason to believe and that statutory remedies must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.
Rohit v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a dowry death case after holding that the prosecution had not prima facie established cruelty in connection with dowry demand and that prolonged pre-trial detention was unjustified post investigation.
Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutionality of differential retirement ages for Indian Coast Guard officers, distinguishing it from CAPFs and applying Article 33 to validate the classification under Rule 20 of the Coast Guard Rules.
Pramod Tanwar v. State Election Commission and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging rejection of a municipal election nomination, holding that such disputes are exclusively triable by election petition under Article 243ZG and relevant statutes, barring interim judicial interference.
Pradeep Kumar Yadav v. Dainichi Consultant Inc.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving validity and arbitrability issues to the arbitral tribunal.
Rajesh Pundhir @ Umesh Pundhir v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a petitioner accused of sexual assault under the POCSO Act, emphasizing victim protection and risk of witness tampering over liberty claims despite procedural delays and evidentiary discrepancies.
Irfan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a minor victim's rapist, affirming that credible child witness testimony alone can sustain conviction without corroboration despite minor inconsistencies and delayed reporting.
Sushant Narang v. M/S Genome Diagnostics Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the lease dispute.
Sushant Narang v. M/S Professional Biotech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the lease dispute.
Sushant Narang v. Sequence Referral Laboratories Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after prima facie finding an arbitration agreement in a lease dispute, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny at this stage.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Annu
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination, emphasizing that medical boards must consider whether a candidate's condition affects duty performance before declaring unfitness.
Manish Gupta v. M/S Oriental Quarries and Mines Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a lease agreement.
M/S BLUSPRING ENTERPRISES LTD v. LOTUS BOULEVARD APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Service Agreement.
Sarla Taneja v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that DDA must issue a fresh demand-cum-allotment letter after judicial restraint is lifted to grant time for payment, quashing cancellation and forfeiture of earnest money as arbitrary.
Tanmay Mishra; Yash Maheshwari; Krishna; Bethsy v. Dainichi Consultant Inc
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.