Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Karan Suri & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating FIR under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement and refund of money, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Gladwin Vincent Solomon and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Dheeraj Yadav v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Harjinder @ Ballu & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and proceedings under Sections 323/341/354/506/509/34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Silky Soni v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Surender Kumar v. Urmila
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking leave to appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that the respondent successfully rebutted the presumption of liability by showing the improbability of the petitioner's case.
Ajay and Others v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case involving matrimonial offences including rape under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and retraction of allegations by the prosecutrix.
Suman Sachdeva & Ors. v. Jagjit Kaur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to frame additional issues in a suit concerning legal heirship, holding that the issues framed sufficiently covered the controversy and that ancillary disputes are separate causes of action.
M/S. CHANDRA GUPTA AND ASSOCIATES v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (APPEALS-II) & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that the Appellate Authority must consider explanations for delay and has discretionary power to condone delay in GST appeals, setting aside the rejection of a delayed appeal and remanding for fresh consideration.
M/S M.S. RAINBOW PRODUCTS v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of GST registration cancelled for non-filing of returns, subject to the petitioner filing all pending returns and paying dues within a stipulated time.
Neeraj Kumar M/S ABM Pneumatics and Hydraulic Seals v. Proper Officer SGST Ward -19 Zone -2
The Delhi High Court held that a GST show cause notice uploaded under an inaccessible category on the portal does not constitute valid service, setting aside the order and remanding for fresh adjudication.
Bablu Rana v. Proper Officer SGST Ward -24 Zone -1 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that uploading a GST show cause notice under 'Additional Notices' does not constitute valid service under Section 169 of the CGST Act and set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after proper service.
M/S ESSENCE COMMUNICATION PVT LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS SERVICE TAX, AUDIT-II, DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for failure to provide the petitioner with the Show Cause Notice, emphasizing the necessity of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Vishal MVR Consortium v. Airports Authority of India
The court restrained invocation of security deposit bank guarantees where invocation letters failed to allege breach of contract or loss, holding such invocation contrary to the guarantee terms and prima facie invalid.
Kamal Kumar v. Energy Efficiency Services Limited
The Delhi High Court referred the dispute between the parties to arbitration under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak as arbitrator under DIAC.
Rita Wadhwa v. Sanjeev Sarin thr Lrs and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the impugned order did not revise auction terms and that observations about forfeiture did not alter the original conditions.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S Ram Niwas Goel
Delhi High Court directs Municipal Corporation of Delhi to implement a protocol for scrutinizing pleadings to prevent repetitive legal defences already settled by superior courts, imposing costs and disposing of the appeal accordingly.
Kavinder Singh Vohra v. Lok Sabha Secretariat and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of an ex-serviceman's candidature for Lok Sabha Secretariat recruitment on the ground that his prior regular government re-employment extinguished his ex-serviceman status under DoPT O.M. dated 02.05.1985.
Shabbir v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for culpable homicide and voluntarily causing hurt but modified the sentence to the period already served, emphasizing reformation and rehabilitation.
Rajendra Kishori Pharmacy College v. Pharmacy Council of India
The Delhi High Court held that approval granted under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for D. Pharma courses is permanent and cannot be subjected to annual renewal or regulatory charges, quashing the Pharmacy Council of India's impugned conditions.