Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Ramdev Mukhiya @ Ramrekh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of murder charges under Section 302 IPC despite the FIR and charge sheet under Section 304 IPC, holding that the question of grave and sudden provocation is a trial issue and the court is not bound by the prosecution's charge sheet.
Mohamad Imran v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by a homebuyer seeking to restrain banks from charging EMIs under a Subvention Plan, holding that disputes under the SARFAESI Act and contractual agreements must be resolved through statutory forums, not writ jurisdiction.
Jitender Chopra v. Y.S. Manchanda
The court held that in suits involving deceased parties with disputed Wills, all legal heirs and claimants should be impleaded as legal representatives, with Will validity to be decided separately in probate proceedings.
Tannu Ruhela v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay violating fundamental rights, while emphasizing statutory compliance and trial adjudication of procedural lapses.
Sagar v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 354D, 506, and 509 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Vikash Kumar Jha v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 408 and 354A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, holding that continuation of proceedings would amount to abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Atul Goyal & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Jatin Kumar Chaurasia & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354B, 498A, 406, 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Kamla Vohra v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 52
The Delhi High Court held that uploading a GST show cause notice under 'Additional Notices' does not constitute valid service under Section 169 CGST Act, set aside the order, and remanded for fresh adjudication after proper service.
M/S Lakshman Pran Data Enterprises v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax, Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for lack of a proper personal hearing and reasons, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
M/S Rajdhani Trading Co. v. Principal Commissioner of Department of Trade and Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for failure to provide personal hearing, directing restoration subject to compliance with outstanding dues.
M S Antarctica Properties Company Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld DMRC's cancellation of a tender bid substantially below reserve price, ruling that such rejection was lawful, non-arbitrary, and within the tender conditions.
Gauri Bhalla v. Ashish Bhalla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking restoration of contempt proceedings against the respondent for alleged abandonment, holding that no mala fide violation occurred as the respondent complied with maintenance obligations and moved out due to the petitioner's complaint.
Raaz Ali v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that minor discrepancies in contraband weight and reliance solely on disclosure statements do not preclude bail, especially when co-accused have been granted bail on similar grounds.
Mithilesh Kumar Mishra and Anish Chandra Mishra v. M/S Radha Pallavi Exports
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to first decide the petitioner's application under Section 151 CPC challenging non-compliance with Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 before proceeding with the commercial suit.
Ankur Ghildiyal v. Sanjeev Puri
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking re-recording or expungement of cross-examination deposition despite procedural irregularity by the Local Commissioner, holding that mere alteration of record does not vitiate evidence signed by the defendant.
Anoop Kumar Gupta v. Raja Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to lead further evidence in an eviction proceeding, holding that undisputed sale deeds can be read in evidence and no additional witnesses are allowed at the final arguments stage without demonstrated relevance.
Prem Aggarwal & Anr. v. Ashwani Parashar
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to conclude the defendant's evidence by a fixed date, refusing further adjournments in an old civil suit, and disposed of the petition as not pressed.
Rajesh Chawla v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that payment of tehbazari license fee does not confer any right or interest in government land and upheld the cancellation of the petitioner’s coal depot license following the ban on coal business.
Jageshwar Dayal v. K K Kapoor
The High Court set aside the Trial Court's order returning the plaint for lack of jurisdiction and transferred the commercial suit to the designated Commercial Court under Section 24 CPC for trial from the current stage.