Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Sahil Chugh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued against bank loan defaulters in absence of criminal proceedings, affirming that fundamental right to travel abroad cannot be curtailed arbitrarily.
Pramod Suri v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a former Additional Director of a company, holding that mere bank loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Kuldeep Singh Solanki v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a company director, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings does not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Kavuru Bhasker Rao v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a loan guarantor, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings cannot curtail the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Usha Sindhu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a non-executive Director in absence of criminal proceedings, affirming that fundamental right to travel abroad cannot be curtailed merely due to company loan defaults.
Mohit Arora v. Bank of Baroda & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued by public sector banks against a petitioner, holding that mere bank loan defaults do not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Shukla Rani v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a loan guarantor, holding that mere bank loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Ajay Mrig v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a bank loan guarantor, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Jogy Scaria v. Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd from the suit, holding it was not a necessary party as no relief was sought against it and it had no cause of action.
Smt Satula Devi v. Mr Rajeev Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a Section 152 CPC application to correct a clerical error in its earlier judgment with the parties' consent, clarifying the plaintiff's case regarding alienation of family relations rather than property.
Harshvardhan Gautam & Anr. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 420 and 406 IPC arising from a loan dispute due to an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
C.P. Arya Public Jr. High School v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court declined to reopen CBSE’s online portal for late submission of compartment exam applications due to school’s negligence but directed equitable accommodation of similarly placed students as per a parallel Rajasthan High Court order.
Bibhav Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of Chief Minister’s PS accused of assaulting a sitting MP, citing serious allegations, risk of evidence tampering, and witness influence.
Bloom International School v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court declined to allow late submission of student details for CBSE compartment exams due to missed deadlines and logistical constraints but directed equitable treatment in line with a similar Rajasthan High Court order.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. A.T. Kearney Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of transfer pricing additions on intra group services and receivables, affirming that tax authorities cannot disallow business expenditures or restructure transactions without credible evidence of non-arm's length pricing.
Pavan Singh Rawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed downgraded APARs of a 100% disabled BSF employee, directing grant of MACP benefits, holding that performance appraisal cannot be adversely affected solely due to disability.
Manphool Singh & Anr. v. Ram Chander & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow respondents to lead defence evidence after closure due to negligence, emphasizing justice in partition suits and imposing conditions to ensure diligence.
Mukesh Marwaha & Anr. v. Rajiv Bhakri & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that under Order XV-A CPC, courts can direct rent deposit during suit pendency even if landlord-tenant relationship is disputed, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Ankit Tayal and Others v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Akshay Tomar and Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323/325/506/34 IPC against student petitioners following an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.