Dheeraj Yadav v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 11 Jul 2024 · 2024:DHC:5123
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 4366/2024
2024:DHC:5123
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4366/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 11.07.2024
CRL.M.C. 4366/2024
DHEERAJ YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Mr. Kulbhushan Mehta, Mr. Aditya Mehta and
Mr. Ankush Kapoor, Advocates
WITH
Petitioner-in-person.
VERSUS
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
& ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for State
WITH
SI Nitesh Mahiya, PS: Samaypur Badli and SI Satpat, Traffic.
Mr. Ankit Gupta and Mr. Vikas Gupta and Mr. Bhavit Sharma, Advocates for
R-2
WITH
Respondent No. 2 in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0851/2021, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at PS: Samaypur Badli and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 22.11.2015. A female child was born out of the wedlock, who is in custody of respondent No. 2. Due to temperamental differences, petitioner and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 10.11.2021. CRL.M.C. 4366/2024

3. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.08.2023. The marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 07.12.2023.

4. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

5. Petitioner and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Nitesh Mahiya, PS: Samaypur Badli. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0851/2021, under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, registered at PS: Samaypur Badli and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. JULY 11, 2024