Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Lucky Garg & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Joginder & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 354, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Manjeet Singh & Ors. v. The State, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Jitender Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to recall a witness for cross-examination on compliance with Section 42 of the NDPS Act, emphasizing mandatory procedural safeguards in search and seizure operations.
Gurpreet Sobti v. DDA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding that only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to entertain challenges to Monitoring Committee decisions, including demolition orders, thereby barring the High Court from entertaining the writ petition.
Shyam Garg and Anr. v. Union of India and Anrs.
Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued against bank loan defaulters in absence of criminal proceedings in India, affirming the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Ajai Kumar & Ors. v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging dismissal of an industrial dispute on non-espousal grounds, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified review under Section 114 CPC.
Captain Amit Tyagi v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the three-year suspension of a pilot’s license for testing positive in a pre-flight Breath Analyzer test, affirming the zero-tolerance alcohol policy under aviation regulations and rejecting claims of false positives due to cosmetic treatment.
Parviom Technologies Private Limited v. Karthik Devraj and Others
The Delhi High Court held that service of summons at a temporary address or inaccessible email is invalid, set aside closure of defendant's right to file written statement, and condoned delay in appeal.
Sunil Yadav v. Aruna Asaf Ali Government Hospital & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed GEM's review petition, affirming that the contract must be awarded to the undisputed H1 bidder and that GEM, as a facilitator portal, must implement court orders without bearing liability for bid creation errors.
M/S FERON LIFE SCIENCES PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER, DELHI GST AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without reasons and hearing is invalid and modified the cancellation to be effective from the date of the show cause notice.
M/S MAYA RAM KRISHAN LAL JAIN AND ANR. v. M/S SHRI BISHAN DASS TRADERS AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of over 130 days delay in filing a commercial appeal, holding that vague reasons like misplacement of case files do not constitute sufficient cause under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
9560995495 v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed coordinated diagnosis and uninterrupted treatment for children with rare diseases, allowing examination at AIIMS Delhi and mandating detailed reporting under the National Rare Diseases Policy 2021.
Leena Paulose v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful seizure and disposal of luxury vehicles under PMLA, affirming that sale of movable properties subject to natural decay is permissible with proceeds preserved in fixed deposits pending trial outcome.
L D SULANIA AND CO. v. DELHI TRANSCO LIMITED
The Delhi High Court extended the arbitrator's mandate by one year and declined to award costs against the petitioner for alleged delay, affirming the arbitrator's discretion over adjournments.
Gurmeet Singh Matharoo v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a bank loan defaulter director, holding that mere default without criminal proceedings cannot curtail the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Vikas Goel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a bank loan defaulter, holding that such circulars cannot be issued without criminal proceedings and must not arbitrarily restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Anil Goel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a wilful defaulter director, holding that mere loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Preet Kaur and Anr. v. Bureau of Immigration and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed Lookout Circulars issued by a bank against guarantors, holding that mere loan default does not justify restricting the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.
Balram Garg v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a Lookout Circular issued against a company director, holding that mere bank loan default without criminal proceedings cannot restrict the fundamental right to travel abroad under Article 21.