Delhi High Court

29,282 judgments

Year:

Vinod Saxena & Anr. v. Anjana

09 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11127

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against tenants, affirming that the landlady's bona fide requirement and choice of premises under the Delhi Rent Control Act cannot be questioned absent clear error.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Veerpal Singh v. D.G., C.I.S.F. & Ors.

09 Dec 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11151-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of an over two-decade delay in seeking restoration of a dismissed writ petition challenging his removal from CISF service for unauthorized absence and negligence.

administrative petition_dismissed condonation of delay restoration of writ petition unauthorized absence removal from service

Suman Kumar Tarai v. The State of NCT of Delhi

09 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11096

The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's pre-arrest bail plea in a serious cyber fraud case, holding that bail would impede investigation and the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail cyber fraud anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC

Bhim Singh Kothari & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 8573

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition extending the retirement age of Indian Coast Guard Commandants from 57 to 60 years, following its earlier ruling in Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Indian Coast Guard retirement age service conditions writ petition

Daya Shankar Karamvir v. Union of India

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11130-DB

Writ petitions challenging seniority lists must implead all necessary parties; failure to do so results in dismissal or withdrawal with liberty to refile.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ petition seniority list necessary parties impleadment

ASSTT. COMDT (MIN) DIVAKARA RAO KATAKAM v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

09 Dec 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:11137-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as the petitioner’s grievance became infructuous after the respondents accepted his representation against the show cause notice.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition show cause notice representation accepted Signal No. R/3177

Ankur Jain v. Swati Jain

09 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11067

The Delhi High Court modified a family court’s maintenance award, reducing it from ₹25,000 to ₹17,000 per month based on reliable income evidence and clarified the distinction between interim, final, and enhanced maintenance under Sections 125 and 127 Cr.P.C.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. Section 127 Cr.P.C. Income Tax Return

Akhtarul Seikh v. State NCT of Delhi

09 Dec 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11069

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements, CDR evidence, and absconding conduct justified denial of bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal bail_denied NDPS Act commercial quantity bail disclosure statement

Prabhat Kumar v. The State of Govt. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11068

Bail was denied to the accused who concealed his prior marriage and induced the complainant into a relationship and marriage on false assurances, vitiating her consent and justifying pre-trial detention.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail consent vitiated by deception concealment of prior marriage Section 376 IPC

Joginder v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Dec 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11070
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape based on the reliable testimony of the prosecutrix and forensic evidence but modified the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC sole testimony of prosecutrix corroboration

Mulakh Raj Dua v. The State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

09 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:11028-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful 10% deduction on refund of unused stamp duty under Section 54 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and denied interest on the refunded amount, distinguishing the Supreme Court's Rajeev Nohwar judgment as inapplicable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant refund of stamp duty Section 54 Indian Stamp Act 10% deduction interest on refund

Mahender Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

09 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11074

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the dismissal of a criminal complaint alleging forgery in land records, holding that no prima facie evidence existed to summon the accused.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. forgery cheating criminal complaint

Ananyaa Space Design and Consultants v. M/S Ranjit Interior

09 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11084

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' appeal under Article 227 to place additional relevant documents on record despite delay, subject to costs and limited opportunity to confront the witness.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC additional documents delay in filing documents relevance of documents

Sh. Davesh Singh v. Sh. Hawaldar Singh and Ors

09 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:11089

The Delhi High Court upheld closure of cross-examination due to procedural delays but granted one final opportunity subject to costs to ensure fairness and expeditious trial.

civil other cross-examination official records closure of cross-examination review application

Union of India & Ors. v. Shri Durga Dutt Saini

09 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:11045-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a senior government servant appointed later than a junior is not entitled to pay stepping up if the junior's higher pay arises from legitimate increments and length of service benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant stepping up of pay seniority pay fixation Fundamental Rule 22-C

Deepak Kumar v. Directorate of Civil Defence, Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.; Faruk Khan v. Directorate of Civil Defence, Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11059-DB

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of Civil Defence Volunteers under Section 6(2) of the Civil Defence Act, 1968 is subject to natural justice if stigmatic in nature, and Section 14(1) does not bar judicial review of such orders, setting aside the dismissal orders for lack of hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Civil Defence Act, 1968 Section 6(2) dismissal stigmatic dismissal natural justice

The State v. Bharat

09 Dec 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:11073

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proving offences beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed stalking sexual assault wrongful restraint criminal intimidation

Shankar Mehto v. Rajo Bhagat & Ors.

08 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:11325

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing functional disability, allowing physiotherapy expenses, and awarding for gratuitous services, emphasizing just and reasonable compensation based on the claimant's vocation and evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability loss of earning capacity minimum wages

Ateeb Raza & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:11048

The Delhi High Court restrained demolition of petitioners' property pending challenge to orders, emphasizing due process and granting liberty to seek regularization.

administrative petition_allowed demolition orders due process of law opportunity of hearing Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Kavita Sharma & Ors. v. Kanta Sharma & Anr.

08 Dec 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:11859

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' application for judgment on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in a partition suit, holding that disputed factual issues require trial and admissions were not unequivocal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions partition suit registered Will