Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Bimal Gupta v. Vaneeta

09 Dec 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:11378
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, limiting its inquiry to a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Appointment of Arbitrator Prima facie examination

Union of India & Ors. v. Sgt Manish Kumar Singh

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11357-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition, upholding the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type II as attributable to military service.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type II Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Pradeep Kumar Jain v. Registrar of Companies

09 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11181
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The High Court held that a director’s resignation under the Companies Act, 2013, is effective upon dispatch to the company, and acquittal by a competent court on the same facts precludes subsequent conviction for holding excess directorships.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 165(3) Section 165(4) Section 165(6)

Al Rifai Haj Umrah Service v. Union of India

09 Dec 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:11230

The Delhi High Court upheld the continuation of the Haj-2025 quota allocation policy for Haj-2026, dismissing challenges by excluded HGOs but directing facilitation for an eligible petitioner to join a CHGO and receive quota.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Haj Policy 2025 Haj Policy 2026 Combined Haj Group Organisers Haj Group Organisers

M/S BERKLEY LIFESTYLE BRANDS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S RAJ BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

09 Dec 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:11513
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator despite concerns of frivolity and abuse of process, holding that such issues are for the arbitral tribunal to decide, while emphasizing the tribunal's power to impose costs for mala fide claims.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator res judicata limitation

M/S NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI SOUTH

09 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11115-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST liability on lease proceeds collected by NBCC as an agent of the Ministry does not arise under Section 86 CGST Act, 2017, and set aside the GST demand against NBCC.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST liability agency law Section 86 CGST Act joint and several liability

Parmar Naran Bhai Rupa Bhai & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11128-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed an order directing recovery of alleged excess payments from Group C and D employees beyond the five-year limit, absent an undertaking or employee complicity.

administrative petition_allowed Significant recovery of excess payments Group C and Group D employees audit objection State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih

Deepak v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi); Arjun v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

09 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan

The Delhi High Court granted bail to applicants accused of possessing intermediate quantity of narcotics, holding that the bar under Section 37 NDPS Act does not apply and bail must be considered on merits once investigation is complete.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act intermediate quantity Section 37 NDPS Act

Minor S through her mother M v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr

09 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:11104
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court allowed termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks for a minor rape survivor, affirming reproductive rights under Article 21 and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 as amended.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Article 21 reproductive rights rape survivor

Vinod Saxena & Anr. v. Anjana

09 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11127

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against tenants, affirming that the landlady's bona fide requirement and choice of premises under the Delhi Rent Control Act cannot be questioned absent clear error.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Veerpal Singh v. D.G., C.I.S.F. & Ors.

09 Dec 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:11151-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of an over two-decade delay in seeking restoration of a dismissed writ petition challenging his removal from CISF service for unauthorized absence and negligence.

administrative petition_dismissed condonation of delay restoration of writ petition unauthorized absence removal from service

Suman Kumar Tarai v. The State of NCT of Delhi

09 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11096

The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's pre-arrest bail plea in a serious cyber fraud case, holding that bail would impede investigation and the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail cyber fraud anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC

Bhim Singh Kothari & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 8573

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition extending the retirement age of Indian Coast Guard Commandants from 57 to 60 years, following its earlier ruling in Cheeli J Ratnam v. Union of India.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Indian Coast Guard retirement age service conditions writ petition

Daya Shankar Karamvir v. Union of India

09 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11130-DB

Writ petitions challenging seniority lists must implead all necessary parties; failure to do so results in dismissal or withdrawal with liberty to refile.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant writ petition seniority list necessary parties impleadment

ASSTT. COMDT (MIN) DIVAKARA RAO KATAKAM v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

09 Dec 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:11137-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as the petitioner’s grievance became infructuous after the respondents accepted his representation against the show cause notice.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition show cause notice representation accepted Signal No. R/3177

Ankur Jain v. Swati Jain

09 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11067

The Delhi High Court modified a family court’s maintenance award, reducing it from ₹25,000 to ₹17,000 per month based on reliable income evidence and clarified the distinction between interim, final, and enhanced maintenance under Sections 125 and 127 Cr.P.C.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. Section 127 Cr.P.C. Income Tax Return

Akhtarul Seikh v. State NCT of Delhi

09 Dec 2025 · Dr. Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11069

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements, CDR evidence, and absconding conduct justified denial of bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal bail_denied NDPS Act commercial quantity bail disclosure statement

Prabhat Kumar v. The State of Govt. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11068

Bail was denied to the accused who concealed his prior marriage and induced the complainant into a relationship and marriage on false assurances, vitiating her consent and justifying pre-trial detention.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail consent vitiated by deception concealment of prior marriage Section 376 IPC

Joginder v. State (NCT of Delhi)

09 Dec 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:11070
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for rape based on the reliable testimony of the prosecutrix and forensic evidence but modified the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC sole testimony of prosecutrix corroboration

Mulakh Raj Dua v. The State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

09 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:11028-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful 10% deduction on refund of unused stamp duty under Section 54 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and denied interest on the refunded amount, distinguishing the Supreme Court's Rajeev Nohwar judgment as inapplicable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant refund of stamp duty Section 54 Indian Stamp Act 10% deduction interest on refund