Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
Manu Raj Bhalla v. Spire Techpark Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a leasehold agreement and MoU containing an arbitration clause.
Mukesh Kumar Srivastav v. Spire Techpark Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a leasehold agreement and MoU between the parties.
Sh. Hansraj and Ors. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed ESIC to frame and notify a broad policy protecting contractual workers' rights, mandating preference for existing workers upon contractor changes and ensuring compliance with labour laws.
M/S PREETHI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES AND ANR. v. M/S APPOLO CRANES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act case, ruling that re-filing a complaint returned for territorial jurisdiction issues must be within 30 days, and the amended NI Act provisions validate jurisdiction where the payee maintains the account.
COGOPORT PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR ANUJ BAJAJ AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court allowed enforcement of information and inspection rights under a Shareholders Agreement and restrained asset dissipation pending arbitration award compliance, without prejudice to ongoing arbitral proceedings.
Manishi Saxena Bansal v. EXL Services.com (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit challenging termination of employment where the cause of action arose entirely at the defendant's Gurugram office despite the defendant's registered office being in Delhi.
Kamlesh Mehta v. Vinod Garg
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider the petitioner’s application under Section 152 CPC for correction of damages awarded, emphasizing that substantive grievances must be challenged by appeal, not by correction applications.
Mayank Dayal & Ors. v. Shakuntala Devi (Since Deceased) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a summary decree on benami ownership, holding that disputed ownership and benami issues require trial and cannot be decided at the rejection of plaint stage.
Ramjas Foundation v. Shubra Gupta and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 102nd AGM of Ramjas Foundation, restrained defendants from unauthorized meetings, and dismissed impleadment of new members as unnecessary parties.
KALAMKARI LIFESTYLE TECH PVT LTD v. MSME FACILIATION COUNCIL MUMBAI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the MSME Facilitation Council in Mumbai has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 18(4) of the MSMED Act over disputes involving a Mumbai-based supplier, dismissing the petition to transfer proceedings to Delhi.
MS. SUBHASH TRADERS v. UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging an NCDRC order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the petition must be filed in the High Court where the cause of action arose.
Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Arpit Tandon & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the NCDRC must record reasons when imposing costs as a pre-condition for notice issuance in consumer revision petitions, setting aside an arbitrary Rs. 25,000 cost imposed without explanation.
Vikhyat Oberoi, Nishita Gupta, Ravi Sharma and Sivam Prakash v. Sagrika D Bajaj
The Delhi High Court modified the Trial Court's conditional deposit requirement in a summary suit between mother and daughter, reducing it to 50% of the principal amount already deposited, and disposed of the petition under Article 227.
Pallavi v. Gaurav Dabas
The Delhi High Court modified the visitation date for a minor child during the pendency of a guardianship petition due to the child's illness, emphasizing the welfare of the child and procedural propriety.
Mr. Akshit Sachdeva v. Rashmi Juneja
The Delhi High Court held that stamp duty on an arbitral award related to property possession must be calculated on the registered sale consideration and mesne profits, not market value, and upheld the executing court's refusal to impound the award for alleged insufficient stamping.
Lalita Thr Lrs. v. Laxmi Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the auction of partition suit property ordered under a final decree, holding that execution cannot be stayed or challenged under Article 227 when an appeal is pending without stay.
Mr. Anand Awasthi v. Jai Durga Traders Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to consider the defendants' application to take on record a written statement accompanied by the prescribed affidavit before proceeding with evidence, staying the trial until disposal.
Sekeletti Doris v. Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused in a commercial quantity narcotics case under the NDPS Act, holding that statutory conditions under Section 37 were not met despite delay in trial and procedural objections.
MYFOJO FOOMIL PVT LTD v. PUSHAAN NAYYAR SOLE PROP YSOSOCIAL MEDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order against the defendant company, allowing filing of written statement subject to costs, to expedite the civil suit proceedings.
Pauline Nalwoga v. Customs
Bail was denied to the accused in a commercial quantity heroin seizure case as she failed to satisfy the mandatory conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act despite procedural objections and delay in trial.