Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
VLCC Personal Care Limited v. M/S Uday Enterprises
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator as per the arbitration clause in the distribution agreement to adjudicate disputes between the parties, allowing the respondent to raise preliminary objections before the arbitrator.
Sujatan K. S. v. M/S Appolo Cranes Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that retrospective amendments validate jurisdiction and complaints must be adjudicated on merits despite delayed refiling.
Benetton India Private Limited v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that a duly authorized company representative can dispose of traffic challans without requiring the MD/CEO's physical presence, setting aside the trial court's unnecessary procedural directions.
Ravi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a gang rape and abetment to suicide case due to prolonged custody and lack of conclusive scientific evidence, subject to strict conditions.
M.M. Dhonchak v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging an interlocutory order rejecting preponement of hearing, holding that such orders are not appealable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.
Khushbu Rana v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned municipal orders afresh in accordance with law.
Radhey Shyam v. Salig Ram
The Delhi High Court held that the amount deposited for the disputed 1997 monthly baari at Shri Kalkaji Mandir shall be equally divided between the two disputing groups, affirming the principle of alternate exclusive performance of baaris and directing continuation of the settled practice.
M Samundra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a CRPF personnel temporarily medically unfit but who regained SHAPE-I medical category is entitled to retrospective seniority and promotion with batchmates, setting aside orders denying such relief.
Sageer Ahmad @ Sagir Ahamad & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 CrPC following an amicable settlement and compensation to the complainant.
Ram Prasad Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS while emphasizing the nature of offence and societal impact.
Kamal Jeet Suman & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Rakesh and Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC in a matrimonial dispute due to an amicable settlement between the parties and absence of objection from the complainant.
Arafat and Another v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Lajja Wati v. Mohammad Sharuck & Anr.
The court held that a claimant cannot simultaneously claim compensation under Sections 163A and 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act for the same accident and upheld the Tribunal's conversion of the claim, enhancing the awarded compensation accordingly.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Soni Sharma & Ors
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal, reducing the compensation for loss of future income due to lack of evidence of actual salary loss, while revising other heads of damages in a motor accident claim.
Tarun Mathur & Anr. v. Anil Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, ruling that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC should not be used to prematurely decide disputed facts or quash summons without material illegality.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. RANVIR & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award against the insurance company, affirming negligence of the offending vehicle and rejecting defenses based on untraced vehicle reports and alleged insurance policy violations.
Harsh Vardhan Bansal v. ACIT Circle 43(1) New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices for AY 2013-14 due to lack of requisite material showing escaped income of ₹50 lakh or more, emphasizing strict compliance with procedural and substantive requirements under the Income Tax Act.
Vinay Ranjan Tiwari & Anr. v. Spire Techpark Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a leasehold agreement and MoU containing an arbitration clause.
Prithvi Raj v. Spire Techpark Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a lease agreement and MoU between the parties.