Delhi High Court

46,774 judgments

Year:

Madhu Koda v. State thru CBI

18 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8066

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking stay of conviction to enable election contest, reaffirming the principle that conviction stays are granted only in exceptional cases and upholding statutory disqualification under the Representation of People Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant stay of conviction Section 389 CrPC Section 482 CrPC Representation of People Act, 1951

Rachit Jain v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

18 Oct 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:8038

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 323 IPC, holding that matrimonial dispute settlements do not automatically warrant quashing when the victim opposes and allegations of cruelty persist.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute

Obi Ogochukwa Stephen v. State of NCT of Delhi

18 Oct 2024 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2024:DHC:8035

Delhi High Court held that waiver of surety bonds in bail for foreign nationals overstaying visas is not automatic and cash deposit cannot substitute surety, but reduced bond amounts were allowed.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail conditions surety bond cash deposit in lieu of surety foreign nationals

Siddhaant Mohta & Ors. v. Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd. & Ors.

18 Oct 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:8053
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the issuance of Green Cards to overage dependents was illegal under the Club's Articles of Association, upheld the Administrator's lawful termination of such rights, and rejected the Plaintiffs' claims of enforceable membership or contractual rights.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Articles of Association Green Card membership Delhi Gymkhana Club Company Law

M/S Sultan Chand and Sons Pvt. Ltd v. Kartik Sharma

18 Oct 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:8090-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a defendant's right to withdraw an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is valid, and a plaintiff cannot compel arbitration when denying the arbitration clause's applicability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act withdrawal of Section 8 application arbitration clause applicability right to arbitration

Deen Bandhu Sharma v. Union of India

18 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8065-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for increments in light of a Supreme Court decision within eight weeks, ensuring a reasoned and timely administrative order.

administrative petition_allowed Article 226 writ petition increments Supreme Court decision

Ramji Lal v. Union of India

18 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8093-DB

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner's HRA arrears claim within eight weeks while upholding an earlier administrative order on pay fixation, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition mandamus basic pay fixation pension re-fixation

Nupinder Singh v. Director General CISF

18 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8068-DB

The Delhi High Court held that imposing a disciplinary penalty solely on prior punishments after acquittal on substantive charges violates double jeopardy under Article 20(2) and set aside the penalty imposed on the CISF constable.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India CISF Rules 2001

Amarjeet Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

18 Oct 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:4801-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action while keeping the petitioner's rights to further challenge reserved.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition representation administrative decision timely disposal

Union of India & Ors. v. Sh. Brij Bihari Singh

16 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8058-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service under the Entitlement Rules and Dharamvir Singh precedent.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 presumption of sound health onus of proof

Kumar Sanjay Jha v. Union of India and Ors.

16 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8055-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Confirming Authority under the BSF Act is not required to consider a Pre-Confirmation Petition before remitting a matter for revision, aligning with analogous Army Act provisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Pre-Confirmation Petition Border Security Force Act, 1968 Rule 167 BSF Rules Confirming Authority

National Law University, Delhi v. Dhyey Bakshi

16 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8043-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Single Judge's order that kept the writ petition pending while relegating the respondent to the appellate remedy under sexual harassment regulations, holding no concurrent jurisdiction was created.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition appeal jurisdiction interim relief

Suman Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

16 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7999

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Sandeep Singh & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

16 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8001

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC dowry prohibition amicable settlement

Salim & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8014

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties and directed the petitioners to plant saplings instead of imposing costs.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Shreyas Tiwari & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8013

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498A, 406, 354D, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Rakesh Gupta v. The State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr.

16 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8546

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 506, 509, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the basis of an amicable settlement and the scope of Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Ram Babu v. New India Assurance Company Limited & Anr

16 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8382
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking seniority and promotion benefits after over 30 years delay, reaffirming that stale claims affecting settled seniority and promotions are barred by delay and laches.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant seniority promotion delay and laches writ petition

MS INAM AND CO. v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS

16 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8121

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a broad notice of claims suffices to invoke arbitration despite lack of detailed quantification.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Appointment of sole arbitrator Notice under Section 21

Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited v. Nikhil Jain

16 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8118

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing an arbitration clause, despite the respondent's non-participation.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) sole arbitrator appointment arbitration clause