Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. John Doe and Others
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendants using deceptively similar marks to 'DREAM11', holding them liable for trademark infringement and passing off in an uncontested suit disposed under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
DR. AZEEM v. STATE
The Delhi High Court quashed charges against a diagnostic centre operator under Section 19 of the POCSO Act, holding that mere suspicion without grave knowledge of sexual assault is insufficient to frame charges.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – Central -1 v. Naveen Infradevelopers & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that no additions can be made on grounds not recorded in the reopening notice under Section 147 if no addition is made on the recorded grounds, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Randa Chehab v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a foreign national challenging her blacklisting for allegedly raising public funds in India on a business visa, holding that such conduct violates visa conditions and justifies blacklisting under the Foreigners Act.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Anil Bhalla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal and condonation application for delay, holding that no incriminating material was found to sustain additions under Section 68 and that the delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic was insufficient to justify condonation.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central -1 v. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of Section 14A disallowance where the assessee had no exempt income for AY 2016-17, holding that the Finance Act 2022 explanation is prospective and not applicable retrospectively.
Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Hong Yi F35 and Others
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and domain transfer in favor of Dream11 for trademark and copyright infringement by a mirror website, disposing of the uncontested suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.
Kingston Enterprises v. NBCC (India) Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the enforceability of a 'pay-when-paid' clause in a back-to-back subcontract, dismissing the writ petition for payment against NBCC and NSG due to the petitioner’s entitlement being contingent on NBCC receiving funds from NSG.
Miss G. v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking directions for stringent police action, holding that interference with investigation under Article 226 is warranted only in rare cases of abuse of power or procedural violation.
DHARAMRAJ CONTRACT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ENPEECOM
The High Court set aside the Trial Court's order directing a bank guarantee under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC due to lack of positive material justifying attachment before judgment.
Havells India Limited v. Electromech India Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded costs against habitual infringers for unauthorized use of a registered ceiling fan design despite their undertaking and non-contestation.
Anuradha Kapoor & Ors. v. M/S. Prime Time India Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to permit the petitioner to summon the ROC official to prove documents already on record, reserving the question of their admissibility for final arguments.
Anantha Biotechnologies v. B. Venkata Ramanamma
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that challenges to NCDRC orders must be filed in the High Court where the cause of action arose.
Atam Prakash Kaushik thr LRs v. Amit Kumar Khattar
The Delhi High Court held that in a Section 6 Specific Relief Act suit, legal representatives of a deceased defendant cannot belatedly amend pleadings or lead new evidence to raise fresh pleas inconsistent with the original defense, affirming the summary nature of such proceedings focused solely on possession and illegal dispossession.
Shakti Kumar Pawar v. Smt Shashi Gosain
The High Court allowed the defendant time to file an amended written statement strictly in conformity with the limited amendment allowed to the plaint, refusing inconsistent or new pleas.
Deepasri Multispecialities Hospital v. MS Anupama NH
The Delhi High Court directed the NCDRC to reconsider the petitioners' pre-2020 application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement on merits, clarifying that the limitation ruling in New India Assurance applies prospectively.
son of the v. ANAND PRAKASH GOYAL
The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy revision petition on the basis of a settlement whereby the tenant agreed to vacate the premises by June 2025 and pay monthly user charges, with the landlord waiving prior claims.
Commissioner of Police and Ors v. Manju Devi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed by the petitioners, applying the precedent set in Usha Devi v. Union of India.
Punjab National Bank v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that reinstatement with full back wages is not automatic for illegally terminated ad-hoc workers and denied regularization absent due appointment process, awarding monetary compensation instead.
Kiran & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the State Adoption Agency to prioritize a bona fide petitioner couple for adoption of a child adopted from an illegal centre, balancing legal mandates with the child's welfare and humanitarian grounds.