Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
M/S Mohan Brothers v. Mr. Mithilesh Pandey
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award of compensation for illegal termination, holding that the petitioner failed to prove voluntary abandonment or valid full and final settlement, and reaffirmed the limited scope of judicial review under Article 226.
EX-CT/WC Pardeshi Jitendra Singh v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the dismissal of a CRPF personnel for unauthorized absence, holding that the departmental inquiry and punishment were lawful and not subject to judicial interference.
Sh. Subhash Chand v. Smt. Maya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the husband's obligation to maintain his wife and children under Section 125 Cr.P.C., modifying the maintenance amount based on minimum wages due to lack of concrete income proof.
Rahul v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner who was found prima facie to have instigated and facilitated an armed attack causing grievous injury, necessitating custodial interrogation.
Ved Prakash Thakur v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to stay auction proceedings and recognized the extended payment period under the DDA brochure, directing deposit of the balance amount with interest pending final adjudication.
Religare Finvest Limited v. Lakshmi Vilas Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the State Bank of India's application for impleadment as a necessary party defendant in a suit challenging unauthorized liquidation of hypothecated fixed deposits, emphasizing the court's discretion under Order I Rule 10 CPC to ensure effective adjudication.
Bir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition alleging violation of parking restrictions by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh representation for administrative disposal, emphasizing procedural fairness and exhaustion of remedies.
M/S AIMS RETAIL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Unlocking or activating mobile phones after manufacture constitutes 'taken into use' under customs law, disqualifying exporters from claiming duty drawback under Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Union of India v. M/S APCOTEX INDUSTRIES LIMITED
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions challenging CESTAT orders on Anti-Dumping Duty Office Memorandums as infructuous after domestic industries withdrew claims, leaving the jurisdictional issue open.
Shivam Pandey v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges, holding that mere breach of promise to marry without mala fide intention does not vitiate consent under Section 375 IPC.
Fazrudeen and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-initiation within the prescribed period, directing restoration of possession and rectification of records, emphasizing compliance with final Supreme Court orders despite pending curative petitions.
FIITJEE Ltd. v. Madhulika Singh
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 227 in arbitral orders is limited to exceptional cases of perversity and dismissed the petition challenging the Arbitrator's refusal to exclude certain witnesses.
Jyotish Kumar Misra and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider writ petitions as representations for grant of notional pay scale benefits within twelve weeks, without expressing opinion on merits.
Vikram Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging Air Force service policy, holding that such service matters fall exclusively within the Armed Forces Tribunal's jurisdiction.
Anwar Kamal v. Subhan Ahmed
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, holding that the landlord proved bona fide need and better title, and the tenant failed to raise triable issues for leave to defend.
Sachin Nagpal v. Gopal Krishan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging the dismissal of leave to defend in an eviction case, affirming the landlord's bona fide need and limited scope of revisional jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Amarchand v. Rakesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement, rejecting the tenant's claim of alternate accommodation and limiting the scope of revisionary jurisdiction.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions even if not specifically pleaded.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC in Section 138 NI Act appeals is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions even if not specifically pleaded.
Shri Anil Arvind Bhai Vaiwala v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 20% deposit condition for suspension of sentence under Section 138 NI Act is not absolute and appellate courts must consider exceptions based on the appellant’s circumstances, setting aside orders that failed to do so.